"For me it’s a when, not if": Ted Evetts aiming for a ProTour return as he embraces life off tour
MODUS
For years, Ted Evetts was one of darts’ most promising young players. A former World Youth Champion and winner of 14 Development Tour titles, “Super Ted” carved out a reputation as one of the most prolific talents on the PDC circuit. His career has already been marked by highs and flashpoints – not least his famous 2019 World Championship meeting with Fallon Sherrock.
ADVERTISEMENT
Now, two years on from losing his PDC tour card, Evetts finds himself at a new stage of his career. Determined to win his way back to the top but also enjoying the chance to embrace the parts of life he missed during eight relentless years on tour, he is striking a balance that he believes can ultimately help him when the time comes to return.
“I’ve been playing quite well recently,” Evetts reflects to MODUS series Tungsten Talk. “I felt unlucky at parts of Q School and Challenge Tour. When it felt comfortable, it was naughty – after 12s, 13s, 14s, 15s – where I expect myself to be. It doesn’t always happen, I understand that, but they’re creeping back into my game. It just needs to happen a bit more often.”
Read also
Life Beyond the Oche
Unlike his years on tour, Evetts’ weekly routine now has room for more than just darts. “I play Monday night with the lads, so I get to see them a bit,” he explains. “Other than that, I’m not really going to local comps. It’s probably doing me a disservice by not doing that, but at the same time, I had eight years on the tour where it was missing nieces, nephews, first birthdays.
“I don’t want to say I’ve taken a step back, because I haven’t. I’m still going to the Challenge Tour and going for what I want. Don’t get me wrong, I’d love to be back on the tour where I feel like I belong. But at the same time, I’m trying to make the most of playing a bit of Sunday League football, going back to golf – just to enjoy life a bit more again.”
It is a new perspective, and one that comes after the rigours of professional life began to weigh on him. “I got to a point on the Pro Tour where I was very much like, I don’t really want to go. I wanted to be there once I was there, but the thought of going back up to Wigan, back to Barnsley, it felt like a chore more than enjoying it. When I started, I was loving life being there. Once I am there, I absolutely adore it. But I think it’s just about trying to enjoy a bit outside of it now.”
ADVERTISEMENT
One of the biggest positives for him has been time with family. “I’ve got a fairly big family and now when I go to see them, it’s carnage – two two-year-olds and a five-year-old – but I absolutely love it. I can go for a walk with them, have that chill out on the weekends where I never ever had that before. It’s something I really appreciate.”
Sacrifices and Pressures
Evetts is clear that the sacrifices darts players make are often underestimated. “Yes, people take it for granted,” he says. “Imagine what it’s like if you’re Luke Littler at the minute. You’re 18 years of age. There’s a risk that over the next 15 years he can’t live as a normal 21- or 25-year-old. Fans just think this is something you have to accept because of the riches available in the sport. But they’re not guaranteed riches, I might add. These are difficult situations you’ve got to manage.”
Now into his second year off the tour, Evetts has noticed a change in perspective. “I want to be there – it’s not that I don’t. But I’m enjoying it. When I am turning up now, it’s like, ‘Ooh, get to go again,’ and I think that’s helping my game. It’s not slog, slog, slog all the time. I can just enjoy it and see what happens. I’m still practising a bit on the side, not pro tour practise, but still ticking over.”
That mindset served him well when he stepped in as a late reserve recently. “I only got the phone call at half nine in the morning. I was already at work. They asked if I could play, and I said, ‘Yeah, go on then, why not?’ It was two and a bit hours from where I am to Wigan. I got about 40 minutes’ practise before Keith rang me asking how far away I was. I said half an hour. He said, ‘That’s all right then, you’re first on – Johnny Clayton on stream.’ I thought, ‘Lovely.’”
ADVERTISEMENT

Ted Evetts aims for return to his best
Crossroads or Confidence?
For some, the second year without a card represents a crossroads, but Evetts remains confident. “To me, I don’t think anything really changes. For me it’s a when, not if. Some of the stuff I’ve shown over the years has been brilliant, absolutely class. My key word has always been consistency, as it has been for a lot of players.
“As soon as that consistency starts coming back, whether that’s in two, three, four months’ time, I’ll start playing more again and slowly build it up rather than jump into the deep end. Last year, outside of here and Challenge Tour, there wasn’t much else. By December I was doing five, six, seven hours on Sundays trying to drive myself insane with it, looking for that click. But sometimes when you look for it, it doesn’t happen. So I’m at that crossroads of, do you relax and enjoy it and let it click, or do you drive yourself insane again trying to find it?”
It is a situation he sees as positive rather than negative. “A lot of people will see stepping back as a negative. I actually see it as a huge positive – getting a slice of life. On the Pro Tour you get conditioned for best of 11 all the time. By taking a step back, you’re playing best of seven here, different formats elsewhere, and you become a stronger player.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Spotlight and Resilience
Evetts has never been daunted by the spotlight. “I never really felt pressure,” he insists. “I always knew I was a tidy player. Dimi [Dimitri Van den Bergh] probably had more of it because he was higher ranked. I was always happy to go under the radar. People could forget about me until I popped up in a semi-final – I didn’t mind that.
“I probably feel more pressure now, because after eight years on tour, winning the World Youth, dev tours, people still expect that now. But really, you’re the next tier down. Still very good, still capable, but not hardened and ready every single weekend.
“When I turned up as a reserve last year, I had a little quarter-final run, beat three top-10 players, and thought, ‘Hello.’ But that was because I was relaxed. There wasn’t the pressure – you’re just filling in.”
The most high-profile moment of his career remains that World Championship loss to Fallon Sherrock, but Evetts is quick to stress that it wasn’t the match itself that changed things. “A lot of people say that game ruined me – it didn’t. What ruined me was the gap afterwards through to March when COVID hit. I was still playing well after Fallon – 100 averages against Wade and Suljović – but then the world stopped. I looked at myself and thought, ‘You’ve let the tour take control of your weight management.’ I dropped four stone before the next Pro Tours just to keep myself occupied. That’s what ruined me. It wasn’t progressive – it was just trying to fill time.”
ADVERTISEMENT
A New Lease of Life
Now, Evetts feels refreshed. “It’s about finding that happy medium. Even the top players don’t want to talk about darts 24/7. Chris Dobey wants to talk about football, Michael van Gerwen about travelling – me, I want to talk about food. You need those things to keep you fresh.”
Cooking has long been a passion. “Something Italian is probably my favourite thing to cook – a butternut squash risotto. For dessert, raspberry Prosecco chocolates. I haven’t made them for a little while, but next time I’m here, I’ll bring some down.”
For Evetts, then, darts remains unfinished business – but it no longer defines his every waking moment. By embracing balance and finding joy in life beyond the oche, he believes he is in a stronger position to return when the time is right. “For me it’s a when, not if,” he says, with a smile that suggests both confidence and contentment.
Read also
ADVERTISEMENT

Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026







