
The Professional Darts Corporation (PDC) World Champion now earns £1 million, which is double the previous record prize in 2025. The tour itself pays out more than £25 million across 2026.
ADVERTISEMENT
Why has the prize money exploded in recent years? There are several reasons. The money comes from three traceable sources, but there's also a fourth source that is much harder to track.
What does the PDC pay in 2026 and who collects it?
Each tournament pays a fixed sum for every round a player reaches, and the PDC ranks players by what they have won over the past two years. That ranking decides who qualifies for the televised events.
| Event | 2025 | 2026 |
| World Championship (total / winner) | £2.5m / £500,000 | £5m / £1m |
| Premier League (total / winner) | £1m / £275,000 | £1.25m / £350,000 |
| World Matchplay (total / winner) | £800,000 / £200,000 | £1m / £225,000 |
| UK Open, World Grand Prix, European Championship, Players Championship Finals (each) | £600,000 | £750,000 |
| European Tour event (each) | £175,000 | £230,000 |
| Players Championship event (each) | not confirmed | £150,000 |
| Whole tour | about £18m | over £25m |
The World Championship doubled its total fund to £5 million, including prizes for the winner, runner-up, semi-finalists and quarter-finalists. The field grew from 96 to 128 players, and every player knocked out in the first round now earns £15,000. That means 64 players share £960,000 before the second round begins.
The largest totals went to events that rarely appear on TV. A tour card is a two-year membership that lets a player enter the PDC's ranking events. Tour card holders play 34 Players Championships, one-day tournaments now worth £150,000 each, or £5.1 million a season.
Source 1: TV and streaming
ADVERTISEMENT
A rights fee is what a broadcaster pays a sport for permission to show its events, usually exclusively, so rival channels can't air them.
Sky Sports' new deal is reported at roughly £25 million a year, a little more than double the old annual fee. That one payment is close to the size of the tour's entire 2026 prize pot. The first event under the new contract was the December 2025 World Championship, the same tournament that paid the first £1 million prize.
Two things pushed Sky's price up:
- The first is audience growth. Sky's World Championship viewing more than doubled compared with the tournament four years earlier, the last before Luke Littler's debut.
- The second is competition from Netflix and Amazon Prime. These platforms were reported to be bidding for the rights, so Sky had to outbid global streaming companies.
Outside Britain, the PDC sells rights country by country and directly to fans. In the US, NBC Sports and its streaming service Peacock show events. In April 2026, the PDC relaunched PDCTV, its own subscription service, with Cleeng, a platform that handles subscription sales, local taxes and currencies in each country.
Source 2: Sponsors
ADVERTISEMENT
A title sponsor pays to put its brand in a tournament's official name, as in the "Paddy Power World Darts Championship."
In darts, those brands are mostly bookmakers. The reason is simple: every match produces a steady supply of things to bet on.
Paddy Power sponsors the World Championship, BetMGM the Premier League, Betfred the World Matchplay, Ladbrokes the UK Open, bet365 the US Darts Masters and Winamax the European Tour.
Yes, there are exceptions. For example, the World Masters is sponsored by the darts equipment maker Winmau.
Sponsors also pay for the moments viewers remember. BetMGM gives any Premier League player who hits a nine-dart finish a set of 18-carat gold darts worth £30,000. A nine-dart finish is the fewest darts a player can use to get from 501 to zero, the darts equivalent of a perfect game.
ADVERTISEMENT
Longer contracts give the PDC income it can plan around. Paddy Power took over the World Championship after the car retailer Cazoo pulled out in July 2023, and it has since extended its deal through 2031. BetMGM renewed its Premier League deal for several more years in May 2026, days after the season ended with Luke Littler's win at the O2.
Source 3: Venues and hosts
From December 2026, the World Championship moves from Alexandra Palace's West Hall to its Great Hall. Each of the 36 sessions will hold more than 5,000 fans, up from about 3,200 in the old hall, and the total rises to 180,000 tickets, more than 40% above previous years.
The PDC and Alexandra Palace have also agreed to keep the tournament there until at least 2031, so the extra capacity is locked in for years.
Fans pay according to where they sit. Tiered seats, in raised rows facing the stage, start at £55. Table seats, where groups sit at tables on the hall floor, start at £75. The 501 Club, a hospitality package, starts at £399.
ADVERTISEMENT
Tickets go through a ballot, a random draw among everyone who applies, and the ballot also sells streaming subscriptions. Fans with a PDCTV Annual membership, a subscription to the PDC's own streaming service, got an early ballot window before the general ballot opened. A fan who wants tickets has a reason to subscribe to PDCTV, so ticket demand also brings in subscription revenue.
Source 4: Crypto
Crypto money sits outside darts' official deals because of how Britain licenses betting. A licensed bookmaker holds a Gambling Commission licence and must license each customer's age, identity, and where their money comes from. UK law doesn't ban crypto in licensed betting, but those money checks have made crypto too difficult for most licensed bookmakers to accept.
That's why crypto betting on darts happens on sites based outside the UK. Offshore sportsbooks let darts fans bet with USDT on the same matches British bookmakers cover.
Some of these sites accept stablecoins, cryptocurrencies designed to stay worth one US dollar. Tether's USDT and Circle's USDC are the two largest.
ADVERTISEMENT
Crypto-first betting brands already sponsor British sport. Stake became Everton's front-of-shirt sponsor for the 2022/23 Premier League season, and BC. Game has sponsored Leicester City's shirt. No crypto brand holds a PDC title yet.
Britain's gambling regulator has begun exploring a legal route for crypto payments. In February 2026, the Gambling Commission asked its Industry Forum, a working group it uses to consult the gambling industry, to set out a "sensible" way for licensed operators to accept crypto.
Stablecoins look like the likely starting point. In May 2026, John Pierce, the Commission's director of enforcement, suggested they could be the first way crypto enters licensed betting. A coin fixed at one dollar is easier for a bookmaker to check than Bitcoin, whose price can swing widely in a day.
What to expect in 2027
Most of the PDC's income is secured for years, with contracts running to at least 2030. The pressure points arrive in 2027. In April, the UK tax on online betting rises from 15% to 25%, and it lands on the bookmakers whose names sit on almost every major title. The industry has warned it will make licensed firms less competitive against offshore sites.
ADVERTISEMENT
If British regulators open a route for crypto payments, the next World Championship title deal after 2031 could attract a kind of bidder darts has never had: a licensed bookmaker that takes crypto. If they don't, prize money can only keep rising if audiences hold up and the stars keep turning up.

Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026
- Not even slightly interestedrick6730-10-2026
- And yet the PDC has decided to aggravate this problem by doubling the Players Championship Finals field from 2027. I can't imagine there will be fewer withdrawals next year with even less reason to turn up. I can only hope that a whole slew of Challenge Tour top-up players receive enough prize money in the absence of much of the elite, that some of the more complacent among them struggle to scrape into even a heavily diluted field! More semi-pro players will get to test their mettle, but the standard of competition will be much inferior. It could hardly be said that the Players Championship series will provide an opportunity for darts' second string to test their Tour Card credentials anymore, but at least it will underscore the achievements of those Challenge Tour players of current and previous years, who were able to prove themselves as more than capable of competing with, and beating, the elite of the sport on a consistent basis, and reaping the due rewards.Deduce635828-10-2026
- No point in being there? Champions want to win.Deduce635828-10-2026
- Littler lost to crabtree in the youth/junior/whatever you call it. He had no point in being there. He's unfortunately now got to the stage,he feels all he has to do is get on the stage to win. Well,I hope he realises part of his fear factor has gone. Happened to Taylor,then van gerwen,and it's causing him to realise pretty sharp,he isn't unstoppable. It's good for the sport,not 1 single player in my 60 years has ever,or will ever be, unbeatable.rick6725-10-2026
- I think it's great to see Mark Webster looking good,good ladrick6725-10-2026





