“I just think it's going to be almost impossible” – Simon and son Mason Whitlock can't agree over darts most prominent subjects
MODUSSimon Whitlock and his son Mason Whitlock don’t see eye to eye on everything in the darts world. In a striking conversation, father and son were put opposite each other with various statements about the sport. While they agreed on some points, clear differences emerged too. From the current ranking system to the sport’s future and Australia’s much-debated defeat at the 2012 World Cup of Darts, the Whitlocks refused to be boxed into one camp.
ADVERTISEMENT
Speaking on the MODUS Super Series, One of the first statements addressed how the darts world ranking is compiled. The claim that the ranking system should not be based on prize money met little support from Simon Whitlock — who will be in action soon at the World Series of Darts Finals.
“I think what they've done in the past 20 years has been correct,” the Australian replied. Mason initially disagreed, but then said he actually believes the ranking system should be based on earnings. In the end, father and son aligned on the current method.
The system in which players are ranked by prize money earned at ranking tournaments has been a key pillar of professional darts for years. The Whitlocks believe that makes sense. Those who stack up big sums over a longer period deserve to sit high on the ladder.
“I don’t think anyone will ever do that again”
The conversation also turned to the future at the very top. That inevitably brought up the exceptional dominance of players like Phil Taylor and Michael van Gerwen. Simon Whitlock sees how hard it is nowadays to rule the sport for years on end.
Read also
“I just think it's going to be almost impossible with the quality of players to win, especially 16 world titles. I just don't think anyone will ever do that again,” said Whitlock.
ADVERTISEMENT
Mason was a touch more optimistic. He pointed out that age can be a decisive factor when an extraordinary tally is in play. “I think Littler will do it, precisely because of his age,” he said. At the same time, he stressed talent alone won’t be enough. “No, he's definitely got the ability. After so many years, he's got to play,” Simon added.
The discussion underlines how extraordinary the achievements of the sport’s greatest names are. In an era where darts is broader and stronger, the Whitlocks say it’s harder than ever to stay unbeaten at the top for years. The field is deeper, there are more strong players, and young talents are constantly emerging.

Mason Whitlock wants to follow in his father’s footsteps
Australian darts has more potential, says Whitlock
When the focus shifted to Australia, father and son were again critical but positive about their homeland’s possibilities. According to Mason, Australian darts is sometimes underrated, mainly because the country has fewer big tournaments and leagues than, for example, Germany and other European nations. “II think it's a bit underrated, just because we haven't got a lot of players coming through like a lot of other countries, like Germany and a lot of the European countries,” said Mason.
ADVERTISEMENT
He believes that’s largely down to infrastructure. In Europe, young players can compete far more often and develop against strong opposition. Australians, by contrast, must travel long distances more frequently to take part in competitions. “Probably because we don't have as many competitions, and you don't get as many people travelling to the competitions,” Mason explained.
Simon mainly looked at the gap between the absolute elite and the rest of the Australian field. “I just think the top Australians compared to, I'd say, there's about 20 great Australian players right now. Compare them to the mid-ranked and lower-ranked Australians, I think the gap is so high,” said Simon. “So I just think, yeah, without those top 20, I think it'd be really hard to judge them.”
The Whitlocks thus point to a key problem and, at the same time, a major opportunity. Australia has enough talent, but needs more events and pathways to develop the depth of its player base.
Read also
Who hits a nine-darter first?
ADVERTISEMENT
Naturally, a lighter question had to feature too. The Whitlocks were asked whether Mason would throw a nine-darter in the MODUS Super Series before his father Simon. Mason could laugh at that. “I'm just going to say I feel like I'm trying a bit better. I might get one before him, but you never know, he might go and sneak one.”
Simon could agree with that. “I'm agreeing. I just think, yeah, you could pull one any time. It's just one leg.”
Mason then made clear he was mainly trying to test his dad psychologically. “I'm just getting in his head, really..” For now, the tally was still at zero, Mason said. “I haven't got any yet,” he admitted with a laugh.
The rivalry between father and son is clearly there. While Simon has built an outstanding résumé and was for years one of the most recognisable Australian darters in the world, Mason refuses to be filed away as merely the son of a former finalist. He wants to make his own name on stage.
ADVERTISEMENT
“The Luke Littler effect”
Simon and Mason were strikingly aligned on one topic: the huge impact Luke Littler has had on darts. According to the Whitlocks, the rise of the young Englishman has not only delivered exceptional viewing figures, but also inspired a new generation of players. “What Luke Littler has done in the past few years and how he's boosted the sport, and all these new kids coming in, it's ridiculous how good,” said Mason.
Simon fully agreed. The surge in interest among young fans stands out to him. “The viewership as well, it's massive,” he noted. Mason summed it up neatly: “Just the Luke Littler effect.”
The Whitlocks believe darts is currently in a particularly strong period. “You've got all the young kids coming into darts, and darts is extremely strong right now. Everybody's watching it, talking about it. It's just a great spectacle at the moment,” said Mason.
Their words reflect a trend that has become increasingly clear in recent years. Littler has not only developed at breakneck speed on the oche, he has also become a face that attracts new fans to the sport.
ADVERTISEMENT
Simon Whitlock played two World Championship finals
The painful memory of the 2012 World Cup
The most striking statement in the conversation concerned the 2012 World Cup of Darts. It was suggested that Paul Nicholson was to blame for Australia’s elimination. The Whitlocks reacted instantly. “Oh my God,” came the response.
Even so, Mason did not want to hold Nicholson fully responsible for the defeat. He pointed out that the pressure must have been immense, especially as Nicholson had the first three match darts. “I didn't put strongly disagree because of the pressure he must have been under, especially having the first three match darts.” Mason explained.
Then came an important caveat. His father Simon also had chances to close it out. “But, of course, Dad also missed three match darts,” Mason noted. Simon could hardly claim Nicholson was the sole culprit. “I can’t help but disagree,” he said.
ADVERTISEMENT
Read also
His reasoning was simple. “I'm just agreeing because he had first shot and he missed. I didn't expect to get another shot, and I probably shouldn't have got another shot.”
The painful memory of that match still lingers for the Whitlock family. At the same time, the story shows Simon’s sporting honesty. Despite the disappointment, he was unwilling to place all the responsibility on his former compatriot. “Sorry, Paul,” Simon concluded with a wink.
The conversation between Simon and Mason Whitlock offered an engaging look at Australia’s darts family. Father and son often disagree, but they share the same passion for the sport. They see the challenges facing Australian darts, yet they are equally excited about the sport’s rapid global growth.
Above all, the Whitlocks have no doubt about Luke Littler’s influence. The young Englishman, they say, has brought a new generation into darts and helped make the sport more popular than ever. For Mason Whitlock, that development also means more and more opportunities for young players to prove themselves at the highest level.
ADVERTISEMENT

Lucas MichaelDarts Journalist
Lucas Michael is a darts journalist and reporter based in Cambridge, UK, and has been part of the DartsNews team since 2025. He covers professional darts through reports, analysis, round-ups, and live coverage, with a focus on clear context and accurate reporting across the PDC calendar.
A key part of his work is liveblogging major tournaments throughout the year, providing real-time updates, match coverage, and contextual reporting across the professional circuit. He also reports regularly from events on site and has covered the PDC World Darts Championship from the venue, delivering first-hand insight throughout the tournament.
Within the newsroom, Lucas works closely with the editorial team and supports coverage alongside Chief Content Officer Samuel Gill and reporter Kieran Wood.
Lucas holds a BA (Hons) in Sports Journalism. In his work, he places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating content promptly when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026







