"I have Luke Littler third at the minute" - Former world number one ranks Littler just behind the greats
PDC
Darts has a new benchmark for fast‑rising prodigies in Luke Littler. Yet the next wave is already knocking on the door. Former world number one Colin Lloyd sees several teenagers ready to make their mark on the pro circuit in the coming years.
ADVERTISEMENT
Lloyd joined the Odds-On Podcast and spoke at length about today’s biggest talents. Michael van Gerwen, Littler’s place among the all-time greats, and the potential of Cameron Menzies were also discussed.
Lloyd tips three standout prospects
Asked who might become the next Littler, Lloyd doesn’t hesitate. The former World Matchplay and World Grand Prix champion believes two players stand out right now, while he is also closely tracking an even younger prospect.
“There are two outstanding players, possibly three,” begins Lloyd, who first names the Scot Mitchell Lawrie. “There’s a young man up in Scotland called Mitchell Lawrie. He’s actually breaking all of Luke Littler’s records in the youth… I think he’ll be at Q-School in January.”
Read also
Kaya Baysal from Burnley also ranks highly on Lloyd’s list. Both players, according to the former top pro, are serious candidates to secure a Tour Card in the near term. “Kaya Baysal’s an extremely good player also. So they’re the two biggest names that are possibly going to be pushing through and trying to get a tour card for next year.”
Yet it may be the third name that captures the imagination most. Lloyd points to Jack Johnson, better known as ‘Jackie Boy’. The Englishman is only thirteen or fourteen, but Lloyd believes he has everything to make a name for himself in the coming years.
ADVERTISEMENT
“There’s another young man, but he’s only 13 or 14 at the moment, and his name’s Jack Johnson, Jackie Boy Johnson. And he’ll certainly be a player to look out for in the future.”
Lloyd highlights what Johnson has already achieved. The teenager recently won the WDF UK Men’s Singles and, during that event, beat two players currently active on the PDC circuit. “He beat two players who play on tour in the PDC ranks at the minute. He beat Martin Lukeman, and he beat Owen Bates.”
Lloyd has little doubt about the trio’s potential. “They’re players for the big stage, and they’re certainly the three big names to watch out for coming through the youth system."
“There are still a few majors in Michael”
Michael van Gerwen’s situation also came up in depth. The Dutchman no longer dominates as he did at his absolute peak, but Lloyd is far from writing off the three-time world champion.
ADVERTISEMENT
Van Gerwen has also dealt with matters away from the oche. Lloyd won’t speculate on that. “Michael’s had some things in his private life going on. It’s no one’s business. Only Michael can deal with that.”
On Van Gerwen the player, Lloyd is more forthright. He admires the Dutchman’s professionalism and drive, and expects Van Gerwen can still add major titles to his résumé.
Read also
“Michael is the consummate pro. He’s always got time for the fans. And he’s also a 101% player when it comes to playing darts because he knows it’s given him a good life. He still loves the game of darts. And he’s just too good."
Lloyd adds that Van Gerwen has shown his top level hasn’t vanished. “He’s proved that this year already. He won two World Series earlier this year. I still think there are a few majors left in Michael."
ADVERTISEMENT
On his best days, Van Gerwen remains one of the most electrifying players to watch, says the Englishman. “As and when he does turn up, he’s still an absolute joy to watch, and he can still produce the brilliance that we’re used to seeing.”
Lloyd was then asked which three players, at their peak, he considers the greatest of all time. His answer was clear: Phil Taylor, Michael van Gerwen and Luke Littler. “Taylor, Van Gerwen, Littler. I have Luke Littler third at the minute."
That Littler, despite his meteoric rise, is not higher yet is mainly due to the vast body of work of the other two, says Lloyd. The young Englishman has only been at the very top for a few years.
"He’s only been on the circuit for two-and-a-bit years. You’ve got to look at someone like Phil Taylor – he had 25-30 years on the tour. MVG’s been on the tour a long while as well.”

The last major title Van Gerwen won is the World Series of Darts Finals in September 2025
ADVERTISEMENT
Cameron Menzies has top‑10 tools
Finally, Cameron Menzies was discussed. The Scot undeniably scores heavily, but his emotions can still get in the way on stage. Asked if, with more control, Menzies could even become a top‑three player, Lloyd was cautious in his response.
“He’s class, but I don’t know about top three. He could definitely be in the top 10. He’s a very, very good player, Cammy. He’s a very heavy hitter.”
Lloyd sees parallels with Gary Anderson. His scoring power was beyond doubt for years, while finishing often hampered him in the early phase of his career.
“When he’s clicking out his doubles, he actually reminds me of someone like Gary Anderson… Anderson has always been a fantastic dart player, always scores heavily. But in the early part of his career, his doubling used to let him down. He still won events, but he could have won so much more if he’s hit his doubles.”
ADVERTISEMENT
When all the pieces finally fell into place for Anderson, he turned into one of the dominant players of his generation. “All of a sudden, when the game came together, back-to-back world champion… one of the most feared dart players in the world.”
Read also
Lloyd doesn’t automatically expect Menzies to build a similar résumé, but he does see enough potential for him to contend regularly at the top end. "I don’t think Cammy can achieve what Gary’s done. But he can certainly put himself in the frame where people are talking about him and talking about him for all the right reasons for being a great dart player."
Lloyd also stands up for the person behind the sometimes fiery stage persona. “He’s not a bad lad. He’s one of the nicest fellas you’ll ever meet in your life. He’s always got time for the fans. He’s always signing autographs, always standing there smiling. He never just walks past someone.”
In the end, Lloyd believes the key lies with Menzies himself. Outside advice can help, but on stage the Scot must learn to control his emotions and take his chances. “You can always give people advice, but ultimately, you have to do it yourself. You have to control your emotions, and when you get opportunities you have to grab them yourself because no one’s going to grab them for you.”
ADVERTISEMENT

Lucas MichaelDarts Journalist
Lucas Michael is a darts journalist and reporter based in Cambridge, UK, and has been part of the DartsNews team since 2025. He covers professional darts through reports, analysis, round-ups, and live coverage, with a focus on clear context and accurate reporting across the PDC calendar.
A key part of his work is liveblogging major tournaments throughout the year, providing real-time updates, match coverage, and contextual reporting across the professional circuit. He also reports regularly from events on site and has covered the PDC World Darts Championship from the venue, delivering first-hand insight throughout the tournament.
Within the newsroom, Lucas works closely with the editorial team and supports coverage alongside Chief Content Officer Samuel Gill and reporter Kieran Wood.
Lucas holds a BA (Hons) in Sports Journalism. In his work, he places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating content promptly when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026










