"When people recognise me it's: 'you're that guy who didn't go for 170'" - David Pallett states that iconic 'Big Fish' moment is more well-known than major semi-final appearance
MODUS
On MODUS Super Series' Tungsten Talk, David Pallett sat down for a candid conversation. About the boy who started darts in his parents' pub, the county years and the jump to the PDC. About peaking on big stages, an infamous 170-finish, loss and grief, dartitis and finally regaining the desire to play. "When people recognise me, it's, 'you're that guy who didn't go for 170.' But I did more than that," he says with a grin.
ADVERTISEMENT
Pallett's dart life began in a small village outside Cheswardine. "My mom and dad had a pub there. I was five or six years old when I first grabbed a dart. After school I was aiming at the board until the place opened in the evening. That's how it started." Not much later, the family moved back to Newport and he immediately rolled into the Newport League. "First triples with older guys, then doubles, and a year later singles. Step by step."
That learning in the league changed tone once he got into the county structure. "Shropshire is where I'm from and I loved playing for that, but then they were playing in Division Four. My dream was to make it to the English senior team (under the BDO). For that I had to come out in a higher division." The decision to move to Cheshire was painful but necessary. "There were SO many class players there: Tony O'Shea, Daryl Fitton, Robbie Green, Gary Robson... to get into that A-team, you had to throw 29/30 average, on a stage, with man-of-the-matches in the B-team. That forced me to get better."
At county weekends and BDO tournaments, Pallett is maturing quickly. A key role is played by Ricky Evans. "We lived on the same street in Kettering for a while. Fantastic training partner - you really want to beat him. His natural talent is one of the best I've ever seen. And as a friend: every trip became fun with him."
Read also
His first TV experience came at the World Masters, against teammate O'Shea. "Work hadn't actually given me time off," Pallett laughs. "I went anyway. Came on stage, enjoyed, lost, but then decided: I'm going to try Q-School."
The jump to the PDC
The move to the PDC follows logically from ambition. "You want to play against the best, and at the time most of the world's top players were at the PDC. I was throwing good averages, so I wanted to test myself." With his Tour Card in his pocket, Pallett immediately established his name - not only with results, but also with his unconventional finishes. "Against Dave Chisnall I had 60 left with one arrow. Instead of single 20 I went for double 14. My darts were a bit up then and I wanted to avoid a 'bust': hit is double 16 over, miss is 14 and then 46 over - six and tops. I didn't particularly like tops. It worked and the commentators frowned. Lovely."
ADVERTISEMENT
He is also thriving at Euro Tours. "Qualifying was the hardest, but if you were there, it was good money and above all: playing on the stage. That's where I come out best. In Germany, Holland, Austria, Gibraltar - I had fun everywhere. When I enjoy myself, I throw my best darts."

David Pallett
Twice Pallett gets to appear at the World Championship at Alexandra Palace. The first time against Adrian Lewis delivers a harsh lesson. Pallett takes the first leg, turns around and says, "I'm the man! With that, he seemed to have riled Lewis, who then averaged 120 in the set. "I fired it up a little too much," Pallett admitted. "You learn: never challenge your opponent without a reason."
A year later, he is calmer against Kim Huybrechts, and cooler. In the deciding set, he polishes off 132 and 122 checkouts for the match. "Only a day later I realised I won six legs in a row. Sometimes everything falls right: the scores, the doubles, the feeling."
Next awaits Mensur Suljovic, still in top form at the time. Pallett misses the double for a nine darter. "I got the chance, which was already nice. The arrow felt great that I released it, but the double didn't hit. Super game, but just fell the wrong way."
ADVERTISEMENT
Read also
After those World Championship experiences, things are going his way: Pallett is in the top 50. Yet at one point it falters and he loses his tour card. "Painful, but you can only do one thing: get up and move on." He does so in unforgettable fashion at the UK Open, in a tournament without a crowd because of snow. "I was in blood form. It helped that it was so cold and quiet - you focus on staying warm and your own game. In the end, I didn't go down until the semifinals against Gary Anderson."
The second PDC period and 'that one 170'
Pallett later recaptures his Tour Card, but it feels different. The results are lacking, and one moment lingers: against Daryl Gurney, he throws triple 20 twice, but then fails to go for the bullseye. "Yes, the infamous 170. I choose a big 18 at that moment, lose the leg and eventually the match. People remember that. Not the semifinals at the UK Open, not the wins over big names, but that clip. Oh well, that's how it goes."
That stage symbolises his feelings on Pro Tours. "I had no fun. You drive there, lose early, look at the clock and think: around 1 p.m. back at the hotel. That saps you. You have to have fun and get back to basics."
ADVERTISEMENT
Privately, problems are also piling up. His father Ian falls ill and becomes confined to a wheelchair. Pallett moves several times and has to care for his father. "It puts everything in perspective. You come home from another bad weekend. He asks how it went, bad news again. And then ... one day you have to say goodbye."
Read also
Those years were tough, but also precious. "We lived together for a long time at the end. I'm grateful for that." Meanwhile, David and his partner Bobby are building their family and having two children. "Now I want to make him proud. That's the fuel."
As if the problems with his father weren't enough, he later developed dartitis. "I kept throwing for half an hour sometimes, but it didn't work out. I won another local tournament, but then two weeks later it was nothing again." Then he put the arrows aside for several weeks. "When I picked them up again, suddenly everything felt right again. I haven't put them down since. I asked MODUS for another chance - I should have let them know earlier that it wasn't going yet - and I got it. For that I am grateful to them."
Pallett doesn't call it a comeback but a new buildup. "Every week you play, you have to give 100 percent. Next year I'm going back to Q-School. I feel ready to compete with those guys again. Just getting in is tough, competing for the marbles is another thing. But I believe it can be done."
ADVERTISEMENT

Lucas MichaelDarts Journalist
Lucas Michael is a darts journalist and reporter based in Cambridge, UK, and has been part of the DartsNews team since 2025. He covers professional darts through reports, analysis, round-ups, and live coverage, with a focus on clear context and accurate reporting across the PDC calendar.
A key part of his work is liveblogging major tournaments throughout the year, providing real-time updates, match coverage, and contextual reporting across the professional circuit. He also reports regularly from events on site and has covered the PDC World Darts Championship from the venue, delivering first-hand insight throughout the tournament.
Within the newsroom, Lucas works closely with the editorial team and supports coverage alongside Chief Content Officer Samuel Gill and reporter Kieran Wood.
Lucas holds a BA (Hons) in Sports Journalism. In his work, he places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating content promptly when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026







