Chris Mason fears darts is driving Luke Littler away and hits out at PDC: "There's something wrong in there"
PDC
Chris Mason is concerned about the direction in which darts is heading. The former professional and current pundit believes the PDC needs to take a tougher stance against supporters deliberately trying to put players off. In particular, the treatment of Luke Littler during the World Series of Darts Finals in Amsterdam has left him worried.
ADVERTISEMENT
In an extensive interview with Online Darts, Mason also spoke critically about PDC policy, prize money and an increasingly packed calendar.
Littler revealed during the tournament in Amsterdam that he could consider skipping events in the Netherlands if the whistling from sections of the crowd continues. The Englishman has already opted against playing certain events in Germany.
Mason understands his position. "I think the powers that be have to. You can't afford to have your poster boy not turning up to events because he gets treated unfairly. And that's what it is. I don't think you'd tolerate it in any other sport, would you? So why do we have to tolerate it?"
According to Mason, comparisons with football do not stand up because darts relies far more heavily on concentration and precision. "Snooker players don't put up with it for a reason, because it's very much a game of focus and concentration," he said. "Can you play to your best in that environment? I would say no."

Mason is a long-time pundit across PDC TV, ITV Sport and TalkSport
Mason calls for tougher measures
Raymond van Barneveld addressed the Amsterdam crowd during the weekend, asking supporters not to whistle while players were throwing. Mason would like to see the PDC make such messages a more regular feature.
ADVERTISEMENT
"When you're in Holland, get all the Dutch players and ex-players, especially legends like Raymond, to do a video making people understand that if they want to see the best stars, and if they want to give the players the best opportunity to perform, there's a certain etiquette," Mason suggested.
He believes the same approach could be used in Germany and England. If warnings fail to change behaviour, however, Mason favours much stronger action. "If not, you've got to go all-in. Get a proper security team in, put them in plain clothes and start ripping people out and banning them for life," he said. "Once people start seeing that, and they've paid all this money and travelled there, they'll know it won't be tolerated. It won't happen."
Mason has no issue with supporters creating noise and atmosphere between throws. Deliberately attempting to make a player miss is another matter. "Just let them play darts. You can make as much noise as you like in between. It's still a party atmosphere. But blatantly trying to make someone lose, what kind of pathetic mentality is that?"
He even fears the current situation could ultimately affect the length of Littler's career. "We should be admiring an incredible generational talent and celebrating it. Not trying to bring him down."
"There's something wrong in there"
ADVERTISEMENT
Mason points out that Littler is still only 19 and is already making decisions about which events he does and does not want to play. In his view, the PDC needs to ask why the sport's biggest attraction is becoming increasingly selective.
"Look at Luke. I think he'd be quite happy to play the Worlds and the Matchplay and that's it. That'd do him, I think," said Mason. "I mean, that's mad, isn't it? So, there's something wrong in there."
Mason believes the PDC risks driving the biggest name of the current generation away from certain events. "They've just got to go out there and go, 'We're not putting up with it,' because they're going to lose the biggest name in the sport right now."
He even believes Littler's fame has already reached a level comparable with Phil Taylor. "I think more people know who Luke Littler is than know who Phil Taylor is, and that's mad considering what Phil did for the sport."
Read also
ADVERTISEMENT
Critical of Barry Hearn comments
Mason was also critical of recent comments from Barry Hearn about players withdrawing from tournaments at short notice. Hearn argued that darts players need to act more professionally and plan their schedules more carefully.
"I think it's very easy to be like that when you've got half a billion pound in the bank," Mason responded. "I didn't like it. I didn't like it that much."
At the same time, he stressed that the contribution made by Hearn, Matchroom and the PDC to the development of darts is beyond question. "What they have done for darts is unquestionably remarkable and we should all be very, very grateful," he said. "All of us, especially the ex-players still working in the industry. You wouldn't be doing this for a job if it hadn't been for Matchroom."
In Mason's view, though, the PDC's success has also created a new set of problems. Players now have far more opportunities to earn money away from ranking events and no longer necessarily need to play every tournament on the calendar.
ADVERTISEMENT
"The players are in such demand now they can earn more money than that doing a show 50 mile away and sleeping in their own bed."
That is why Mason believes European Tour prize money in particular needs to rise, with the winner currently receiving £35,000. "Me and Ray and Glen were sort of laughing, and Vinnie, saying if there was a tournament with £35,000 to the winner, we'd have walked there," he said. "Well, times have changed."
More support for lower-ranked players
Mason also believes players lower down the professional ladder need greater financial support. A Tour Card provides no guaranteed income, while competing in Players Championship events can still involve considerable costs. "If you're playing three days in Den Bosch next week and having five days off work, four nights in a hotel, the travel, it ramps up the cost."
He would therefore like to see even first-round losers receive some prize money to help cover their expenses. "I don't know why they didn't just go, 'Right, we're not going to give second-round losers £1,250. We'll give them £1,000. We'll give first-round losers £250. At least that pays some of their expenses.'"
ADVERTISEMENT
Mason rejects the argument that this would simply amount to rewarding failure. "It's not losers. They're part of your event," he said. "Not to reward them for playing in your product I think is scandalous."
He also believes it is too simplistic to tell struggling players that they simply need to improve. "I could give Littler 20 first-round draws and he might only win 10, 12 of them. What are you going to tell him? Get better? This game is tough. There's very little in it across the top sort of 32, 48, 64."
Positive about further European expansion
Not everything came in for criticism. Mason is enthusiastic about the PDC's continued expansion into continental Europe.
France will host a European Tour event for the first time in 2027 and Mason believes the location is an interesting choice because of its proximity to several established darts markets.
ADVERTISEMENT
"It's in a new territory, which again ticks the right boxes. It's close to Belgium so we'll get those supporters, and it's close enough to Germany and Holland to get those," he said. "I think it's interesting."
Mason is also positive about the arrival of a new ranking major on the European mainland. Germany in particular, he believes, deserves a bigger event after years of strong fan support. "The European Tours that are in Germany are always amazing and always pretty much sellouts from the Friday night onwards, and that's their reward."
Yet one question remains at the heart of Mason's concerns about the way darts is developing. The PDC has taken the sport to unprecedented commercial and financial heights, but that success has also given the biggest players the freedom to become far more selective about where and when they compete. "It's almost like the PDC have done it so well that it's creating its own problems."

Kieran WoodDarts Journalist
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He contributes to DartsNews.com, where he covers professional darts through news, match reports, analysis, and live coverage across the PDC calendar and major tournaments.
A key part of his work is on-site reporting from leading events. Kieran has covered the PDC World Darts Championship in person, reporting daily from the venue and providing first-hand insight from the tournament. During his coverage, he has conducted interviews with leading players including Luke Littler, Luke Humphries, and Gerwyn Price.
He is also one of the leading voices of the English-language Dartsnews Podcast, contributing regular analysis and discussion on developments across the professional darts circuit.
In his reporting, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026







