The draw for the first three rounds of the 2024 UK Open Darts has been announced. This tournament is the largest television tournament of the PDC. No less than 158 players will compete for the title during the 'FA Cup of Darts' from March 1 to 3. Participants enter the tournament in phases. The top-32 of the world rankings, for example, only have to start in the fourth round.
ADVERTISEMENT
World leaders such as world champion Luke Humphries, Michael Smith, Michael van Gerwen, Gerwyn Price, Peter Wright, Nathan Aspinall, defending champion Andrew Gilding and teenage sensation Luke Littler will join in from the fourth round.
Gilding surprisingly won the UK Open last year. After a thrilling final, 'Goldfinger' was too strong for Van Gerwen with 11-10 and the Englishman took his first PDC major.
Read also
Draw UK Open Darts 2024
First round
Jacques Labre Bye
Christian Kist v Patrick Geeraets
Matthew Dennant v Jeffrey de Graaf
Conan Whitehead v Leonard Gates
Dom Taylor v Brandon Western
Lukas Wenig v Tom Lonsdale
Jarred Cole Bye
Leighton Bennett v Scott Mitchell
Danny Lauby v Nathan Rafferty
Kevin Burness v John Henderson
Owen Bates v Andy Boulton
Connor Scutt v Wesley Plaisier
Jules van Dongen v Thibault Tricole
Jack Male v Martin Dragt
Ashley Coleman v Tim Wolters
Brett Claydon v Thomas Lovely
Bradly Roes v Benjamin Reus
Haupai Puha v Jelle Klaasen
Jitse van der Wal v Johnny Haines
Sebastian Bialecki v Jenson Walker
Bradley Brooks v Cam Crabtree
Paul Krohne v Michael Taylor
Christopher Toonders v Chris Landman
George Killington v Radek Szaganski
Rusty-Jake Rodriguez v Ron Meulenkamp
Harry Gregory v Rhys Griffin
Joe Croft v William Borland
Jason Hogg v Darren Beveridge
Harry Lane v Dominik Gruellich
Darryl Pilgrim v Joshua Richardson
Michele Turetta v Robert Grundy
David Sumner v Wessel Nijman
Second round
Niels Zonneveld v Sumner/Nijman
Arron Monk v Dylan Slevin
Ronny Huybrechts v Lane/Gruellich
Tunders/Landman v Lee Evans
James Hurrell v Croft/Borland
Geert Nentjes v Pascal Rupprecht
Pilgrim/Richardson v Keegan Brown
Berry van Peer v Maik Kuivenhoven
Hogg/Beveridge v Bennett/Mitchell
Jurjen van der Velde v Jeffrey de Zwaan
Gregory/Griffin v Whitehead/Gates
Karel Sedlacek v Robert Owen
Killington/Szaganski v Robbie Knops
Scutt/Plaisier v Puha/Klaasen
Jacques Labre v Steve Lennon
Bates/Boulton v Graham Usher
Turetta/Grundy v Jarred Cole
Krohne/M Taylor v Graham Hall
Jeffrey Sparidaans v Christian Perez
Bialecki/Walker v Coleman/Wolters
Daniel Klose v Adam Warner
Dennant/De Graaf v Danny van Trijp
Brooks/Crabtree v Van Dongen/Tricole
D Taylor/Western v Burness/Henderson
Adam Smith-Neale v Kist/Geeraets
Male/Dragt v Lauby/Rafferty
Wenig/Lonsdale v Roes/Reus
Callum Goffin v Nick Kenny
Andy Baetens v Claydon/Lovely
Owen Roelofs v Stephen Burton
Van der Wal/Haines v Mario Vandenbogaerde
Josh Payne v Rusty-Jake Rodriguez/Meulenkamp
Third round
Mike De Decker v Zonneveld/Sumner/Nijman
Goffin/Kenny v Matt Campbell
Wenig/Lonsdale/Roes/Reus v Callan Rydz
Van Peer/Kuivenhoven v Simon Whitlock
Steve Beaton v Payne/Rusty-Jake Rodriguez/Meulenkamp
Martin Lukeman v Jermaine Wattimena
Gian van Veen v D Taylor/Western/Burness/Henderson
Alan Soutar v Baetens/Claydon/Lovely
Mervyn King v Killington/Szaganski/Knops
William O'Connor v Mensur Suljovic
Bates/Boulton/Usher v R Huybrechts/Lane/Gruellich
Sedlacek/Owen v Kevin Doets
Brooks/Crabtree/Van Dongen/Tricole v Cameron Menzies
ADVERTISEMENT
Pilgrim/Richardson/Brown v Jamie Hughes
Keane Barry v Hurrell/Croft/Borland
Bialecki/Walker/Coleman/Wolters v Ryan Joyce
Ryan Meilke v Nentjes/Rupprecht
Dennant/De Graaf/Van Trijp v Hogg/Beveridge/Bennett/Mitchell
Jim Williams v Gregory/Griffin/Whitehead/Gates
Adam Gawlas v Turetta/Grundy/Cole
Roelofs/Burton v Richard Veenstra
Ricky Evans v Toonders/Landman/L Evans
Male/Dragt/Lauby/Rafferty v Labre/Lennon
Ricardo Pietreczko v Krohne/Mi Taylor/Hall
Boris Krcmar v Ritchie Edhouse
Scutt/Plaisier/Puha/Klaasen v Klose/Warner
Luke Woodhouse v Monk/Slevin
Van der Velde/De Zwaan v Smith-Neale/Kist/Geeraets
Van der Wal/Haines/Vandenbogaerde v Florian Hempel
Mickey Mansell v Ian White
Vincent van der Voort v Sparidaans/Perez
Rowby-John Rodriguez v Madars Razma
Kieran WoodDarts Journalist
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He contributes to DartsNews.com, where he covers professional darts through news, match reports, analysis, and live coverage across the PDC calendar and major tournaments.
A key part of his work is on-site reporting from leading events. Kieran has covered the PDC World Darts Championship in person, reporting daily from the venue and providing first-hand insight from the tournament. During his coverage, he has conducted interviews with leading players including Luke Littler, Luke Humphries, and Gerwyn Price.
He is also one of the leading voices of the English-language Dartsnews Podcast, contributing regular analysis and discussion on developments across the professional darts circuit.
In his reporting, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 7visitors 4
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026