Michael van Gerwen not only bowed out of the World Matchplay on Tuesday evening, but also relinquished his place in the top four of the PDC Order of Merit.
ADVERTISEMENT
The three-time world champion lost in the second round after a pulsating thriller 14-12 to Dirk van Duijvenbode and sees the impact immediately on the PDC Order of Merit. Due to his early exit, Van Gerwen drops at least to sixth on the world rankings, while the damage could worsen over the coming days.
The World Matchplay was a pivotal tournament for Van Gerwen. Two years ago he reached the final in Blackpool, a result that earned him £100,000 in prize money at the time. He needed to defend that amount this edition to safeguard his position at the very top of the rankings.
That mission failed. With his second-round elimination, Van Gerwen collects only £22,500 in prize money. As a result, he loses a net £77,500 on the world rankings, a hefty blow with immediate consequences.
End of an impressive run
The defeat means more than just an early World Matchplay exit. Van Gerwen drops out of the world’s top four for the first time in over thirteen years.
Read also
Since reaching the World Championship final at the start of 2013, the Brabant native had been continuously among the world’s top four players. Even more remarkable was his stint as number one: from January 2014 through January 2021, Van Gerwen led the world rankings without interruption.
ADVERTISEMENT
That long streak now comes to an end. With four second-round matches still to play and the rest of the tournament ahead, it is certain that Van Gerwen will return from the World Matchplay ranked at least sixth in the world.
Michael van Gerwen has definitively lost his place in the world’s top four
Even steeper drop looms
It may not stop there, however. Several players can still overtake Van Gerwen during the remainder of the tournament. Josh Rock will pass the Dutchman if he gets past Luke Littler in the quarterfinals.
Gerwyn Price can also leapfrog Van Gerwen. For that to happen, the Welshman must first beat Rob Cross in the second round and then also defeat the winner of the tie between Cameron Menzies and Ross Smith.
ADVERTISEMENT
The other chasers face a much tougher task. Gary Anderson, Ryan Searle, and Wessel Nijman can only move ahead of Van Gerwen if they reach the final. Ross Smith would even need the title to overtake the Dutchman in the rankings. In the worst-case scenario, Van Gerwen could slip to as low as tenth in the world.
Tougher draws at majors
A lower position on the world rankings also has immediate implications for draws at the biggest TV tournaments.
Whereas Van Gerwen for years met the outright favourites relatively late as one of the highest seeds, he could now run into players like Luke Littler and Luke Humphries much earlier. That makes the road to new major titles significantly harder.
ADVERTISEMENT
Big challenges ahead towards the Worlds
The concerns are not limited to the World Matchplay. Towards the end of the year, Van Gerwen risks slipping further down the world rankings.
At the upcoming World Championship he again defends a substantial amount of prize money. His runner-up finish last winter earned him £200,000, a sum he needs to maintain to protect his place in the top 16 on the Order of Merit.
The outlook on that front is worrying. On the projected PDC Order of Merit after the next Worlds, Van Gerwen currently sits only nineteenth. Should that scenario materialise, it would be the first time since his World Grand Prix win in 2012 that ‘Mighty Mike’ falls outside the top sixteen of the world rankings.
PDC Live Order of Merit (as of 22/07)
ADVERTISEMENT
| Rk | +/- | Name | Prize Money | R1 | R2 | QF | SF | Final | Champion |
| 1 | Luke Littler | 2953.5 | 2931 | 2941 | 2953.5 | 2983.5 | 3043.5 | 3143.5 | |
| 2 | Luke Humphries | 1008 | 1008 | ||||||
| 3 | Gian van Veen | 956 | 946 | 956 | 968.5 | 998.5 | 1058.5 | 1158.5 | |
| 4 | +1 | Jonny Clayton | 684.5 | 674.5 | 684.5 | ||||
| 5 | +1 | James Wade | 644.75 | 634.75 | 644.75 | 657.25 | 687.25 | 747.25 | 847.25 |
| 6 | -2 | Michael van Gerwen | 643 | 633 | 643 | ||||
| 7 | +1 | Josh Rock | 639.5 | 617 | 627 | 639.5 | 669.5 | 729.5 | 829.5 |
| 8 | -1 | Gerwyn Price | 622.5 | 612.5 | 622.5 | 635 | 665 | 725 | 825 |
| 9 | Stephen Bunting | 618.25 | 608.25 | 618.25 | |||||
| 10 | Danny Noppert | 604.25 | 604.25 | ||||||
| 11 | +1 | Gary Anderson | 601.75 | 579.25 | 589.25 | 601.75 | 631.75 | 691.75 | 791.75 |
| 12 | -1 | Ryan Searle | 597.25 | 587.25 | 597.25 | 609.75 | 639.75 | 699.75 | 799.75 |
| 13 | +1 | Wessel Nijman | 577.25 | 567.25 | 577.25 | 589.75 | 619.75 | 679.75 | 779.75 |
| 14 | -1 | Chris Dobey | 570.5 | 570.5 | |||||
| 15 | +1 | Nathan Aspinall | 531.75 | 521.75 | 531.75 | ||||
| 16 | -1 | Ross Smith | 522.75 | 512.75 | 522.75 | 535.25 | 565.25 | 625.25 | 725.25 |
| 17 | Jermaine Wattimena | 510.25 | 510.25 | ||||||
| 18 | Luke Woodhouse | 492 | 492 | ||||||
| 19 | Martin Schindler | 447.75 | 447.75 | ||||||
| 20 | Krzysztof Ratajski | 430.5 | 430.5 | ||||||
| 21 | +2 | Damon Heta | 430.25 | 430.25 | |||||
| 22 | Mike De Decker | 428 | |||||||
| 23 | -2 | Rob Cross | 424 | 414 | 424 | 436.5 | 466.5 | 526.5 | 626.5 |
| 24 | Ryan Joyce | 396.25 | 396.25 | ||||||
| 25 | +3 | Dirk van Duijvenbode | 395.75 | 373.25 | 383.25 | 395.75 | 425.75 | 485.75 | 585.75 |
| 26 | +1 | Cameron Menzies | 385.75 | 375.75 | 385.75 | 398.25 | 428.25 | 488.25 | 588.25 |
| 27 | -2 | Andrew Gilding | 364.25 | 364.25 | |||||
| 28 | +1 | Dave Chisnall | 361.75 | 361.75 | |||||
| 29 | -3 | Daryl Gurney | 353.5 | ||||||
| 30 | Kevin Doets | 343.5 | 343.5 | ||||||
| 31 | Joe Cullen | 316 | 316 | ||||||
| 32 | Ritchie Edhouse | 298.75 |
Prize money in units of £1,000. Source: Dartsrankings.com
Plenty of chances left to limit the damage
Yet it has not come to that. Over the next few months, Van Gerwen still has ample opportunities to reclaim valuable ranking points. In fact, at the major TV events in the autumn, the Dutchman has relatively little to defend.
ADVERTISEMENT
At the World Grand Prix, the European Championship, the Grand Slam of Darts, and the Players Championship Finals, Van Gerwen did not produce strong results in 2024. That means there is relatively little prize money at stake for him to defend at those events.
Lucas MichaelDarts Journalist
Lucas Michael is a darts journalist and reporter based in Cambridge, UK, and has been part of the DartsNews team since 2025. He covers professional darts through reports, analysis, round-ups, and live coverage, with a focus on clear context and accurate reporting across the PDC calendar.
A key part of his work is liveblogging major tournaments throughout the year, providing real-time updates, match coverage, and contextual reporting across the professional circuit. He also reports regularly from events on site and has covered the PDC World Darts Championship from the venue, delivering first-hand insight throughout the tournament.
Within the newsroom, Lucas works closely with the editorial team and supports coverage alongside Chief Content Officer Samuel Gill and reporter Kieran Wood.
Lucas holds a BA (Hons) in Sports Journalism. In his work, he places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating content promptly when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026