"Has the capability to go up there and have a stinker": Dan Dawson warns Michael van Gerwen ahead of tough Gilding test
PDC
Michael van Gerwen remains one of the leading contenders for the World Matchplay, but according to darts commentator and analyst Dan Dawson, the Dutchman is far from guaranteed to make a deep run in Blackpool. Dawson believes Van Gerwen still possesses the level required to win the tournament, but also warns that the world number four could just as easily suffer an early exit.
ADVERTISEMENT
Van Gerwen begins his World Matchplay campaign on Sunday afternoon at the iconic Winter Gardens with a first-round clash against Andrew Gilding. On paper, the Dutchman starts as the favourite, but Dawson sees plenty of reasons to question his chances.
Dawson perhaps is best placed when it comes to discussing Van Gerwen as a big name commentator and analyst who watches the tour week in week out. He added though that he still has the ability to beat anyone on his day.
“I think there are question marks about Michael van Gerwen. You don’t know what you are going to get," said Dawson on The Darts Show. "Michael van Gerwen has the capability to go to Blackpool and play brilliant darts and win the title.
“There is absolutely no question about that. But Michael van Gerwen also has the capability to go up there and have a bit of a stinker.”
Inconsistent majors
The concerns are not without foundation. Although Van Gerwen has won two World Series events and a Players Championship title this season, his performances in the major televised ranking events have fallen short. At the World Championship, UK Open and World Masters, he was eliminated before reaching the quarter-finals on each occasion.
ADVERTISEMENT
That makes the World Matchplay an important opportunity for Van Gerwen to prove he can once again compete for the biggest titles on the sport's biggest stages.
However, the task will be anything but straightforward, with Andrew Gilding arriving in Blackpool after several impressive campaigns at the Winter Gardens.
Dawson has been impressed by the consistency of the former UK Open champion and believes Gilding has all the tools to produce another upset. Known as a big fan of 'Goldfinger' and a player with a cult following, Gilding won't be easy.
“He’s got Andrew Gilding, who is an incredibly consistent performer. If Andrew Gilding gets into the quarter-final of this year’s World Matchplay, that is three years in a row he has done that. He got, like, Jermaine Wattimena as close as anyone to beating Littler at the Matchplay last year.
Don't write off Andrew Gilding says Dawson.
ADVERTISEMENT
According to Dawson, that would even surpass a remarkable achievement by one of the sport's greatest players. “He was excellent. Now if he reaches three quarter-finals in a row at the Matchplay, Gary Anderson has never gone back-to-back in quarter-finals at the Matchplay.
“He played a lot of them and he has won the thing. But he is a very, very difficult player to beat, Andrew Gilding.
“He has beat Van Gerwen recently on the stage at the Euro Tour. He has beaten Van Gerwen famously in the final at the UK Open.
"Don't know what version of Van Gerwen we get"
Despite his concerns, Dawson is not ruling out a strong showing from Van Gerwen. He has seen the Dutchman produce excellent performances in recent months, including his World Series title in Copenhagen.
ADVERTISEMENT
“I don’t know what version of Van Gerwen we get. I think he has played some really good stuff.
“He won in Copenhagen on the World Series recently. But he doesn’t convince you like he has for so many years.
However, it is the inconsistency that continues to worry him. As a result, Dawson admits he has no idea which version of Van Gerwen will appear on stage on Sunday.
“You have absolutely no clue. I think Andrew Gilding has a massive chance of taking Van Gerwen out. That is only one of the seeded players who is looking at that draw.”
Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026
- Not even slightly interestedrick6730-10-2026
- And yet the PDC has decided to aggravate this problem by doubling the Players Championship Finals field from 2027. I can't imagine there will be fewer withdrawals next year with even less reason to turn up. I can only hope that a whole slew of Challenge Tour top-up players receive enough prize money in the absence of much of the elite, that some of the more complacent among them struggle to scrape into even a heavily diluted field! More semi-pro players will get to test their mettle, but the standard of competition will be much inferior. It could hardly be said that the Players Championship series will provide an opportunity for darts' second string to test their Tour Card credentials anymore, but at least it will underscore the achievements of those Challenge Tour players of current and previous years, who were able to prove themselves as more than capable of competing with, and beating, the elite of the sport on a consistent basis, and reaping the due rewards.Deduce635828-10-2026
- No point in being there? Champions want to win.Deduce635828-10-2026
- Littler lost to crabtree in the youth/junior/whatever you call it. He had no point in being there. He's unfortunately now got to the stage,he feels all he has to do is get on the stage to win. Well,I hope he realises part of his fear factor has gone. Happened to Taylor,then van gerwen,and it's causing him to realise pretty sharp,he isn't unstoppable. It's good for the sport,not 1 single player in my 60 years has ever,or will ever be, unbeatable.rick6725-10-2026
- I think it's great to see Mark Webster looking good,good ladrick6725-10-2026
- I agree,I can't believe the lack of coverage of this sad loss. Always enjoyed watching him,but I guess now it's all about littler,well it seems that way. Darts has sadly lost a good manrick6717-10-2026
- In the absence of a report regarding the death of Stefan Lord, I'll assist. An excellent player in the late 70s and early 80s, he actually won the now defunct 3rd place match at two World Championships and a couple of the News of the World Championships. A fabulous player and easily the best Swedish player ever. Rest peacefully Stefan.richieburnettrocks16-10-2026
- Joking aside, it is the second most watched sport on sky (more than golf, F1 etc) behind football only, and in participation is second to only football and swimming. It doesn't get the attention or sponsorship of "bigger" sports because it's not as sexy, but it's right up there.BandB13-10-2026