"I gave him the dartboard and he sat there crying": Phil Taylor recalls unexpected best World Matchplay memory
PDCIn the run-up to the World Matchplay in Blackpool, there is one name that remains inextricably linked to the prestigious tournament and that, of course, is darts legend Phil Taylor.
ADVERTISEMENT
The 16-time champion of the iconic event at Winter Gardens looked back on his memories, victories, rivalries and the inevitable drive to keep improving in a wide-ranging interview with Moda Super Series.
Although his list of honors is full of records, it is not necessarily sporting glory that Taylor names first. "The best memory for me was the young lad named Stan who was in a wheelchair, he was paralysed, he passed away now. When I did the nine darter (against Chris Mason), I gave him the darts and the dartboard and he sat there crying.
Besides the iconic moment with Stan, Taylor also remembers well what he earned for that perfect leg. "£100,000, I know yeah. And then the year after, he put a brand-new Mercedes there, I think it was a £100,000 Mercedes, but he put the car right by the side of the stage. So every time you were on for it, you kept looking at the car thinking, I'm going to have that in a minute."
Read also
Taylor's impressive run of 16 World Matchplay titles is second to none, but he himself cites his defeats as the moments that come up first. "it's not the winning so much, it's the losing, what gets you. I've had some great, great games. I think the last Matchplay for me has got to be the best one, because it was the hardest run."
"I had Gerwyn Price, Barney and Michael (van Gerwen), Adrian (Lewis), Peter Wright. So it was really tough to get through. I think my odds then were around 50-1."
In the final, Taylor received another nice gesture from Wright. "Give me the walk-on last, yeah. Peter was upset a little bit. Yeah, he didn't like me retiring, because I was always inspiring him a little bit, because of what I'd done."
ADVERTISEMENT
"He says, you inspire me, you want me to make play all day, because you keep practising."
Manley mind games
Another memorable moment was his unexpected defeat against Peter Manley in 1999. "He said, will you sign the board for one of the kids in the audience? He's done that as a kind of mind game as a Mickey take."
"Now, I mean, I love him to bits now, you know what I mean, we're like really good friends. It's difficult when you are playing each other, because he was on all the time, and I used to snap at him."
Read also
ADVERTISEMENT
Although the World Championship is usually considered the biggest tournament, the World Matchplay had a special place in Taylor's heart. "This Matchplay coming up now, we've got a heatwave at the minute, so that stage is going to be boiling. But during the day, you've got something you can do, you can sit outside, my own place up there, I've got a big lodge, so we can sit outside on nice garden furniture and just enjoy the sunshine and relax. At the World Championship, it's winter."
His preparation was therefore unique. Not a standard hotel room but home comforts. "I had my own bed, I had my own pillows, I had my own practise board, which was set up perfect."
His tactics were thought out to perfection. "I'd win the bull and give it away. So you go first. And then I'd try and get the first leg off you. Then keep the second leg, because I'm 2-0 up now. I'm pushing your leg all the time, I'm putting you under pressure all the time."
Kevin Painter went berserk at Taylor mind-games
The master in many ways
ADVERTISEMENT
Even apparent psychological games had a practical purpose. "The best one I ever did, it was me and Kevin Painter. Kevin to throw first, because you alternate the throw. Kevin went bull, I went bull. I think we had five on the trot and then it was me, it was Kevin to throw. He hit 25, I hit bull and I went you can go first Kevin. He went berserk. Are you kidding me? After all that, he went mental."
Besides experience and level, Taylor also mentions the physical aspect of the World Matchplay. "You've got to cope with the heat. used to do a lot of saunas and steam, so I was used to the heat."
With a winning percentage of more than 90 percent at Winter Gardens, 107 matches played and an unprecedented run of eight consecutive titles between 2008 and 2015, it seems as if Taylor hardly dropped a stitch. Albeit while he remembers some times, he doesn't remember others.
He barely remembers his loss against James Wade in 2015. "I didn't even know James Wade beat me. Now, I'm not the best one remembering games now. I'm 65 this year. Can't remember my name half the time."
But when he did lose, it would create a frenzy. "Laughable. Because I never took any notice. I used to say, go on, I'll show you."
ADVERTISEMENT
Finally, Taylor pulled the plug in 2018. His final year felt like the longest ever. "The last year was the longest year in my career because I wanted to finish. So, the last year, I said to Barry, I had a meeting with Barry, he said, well, just play your card out. Just go to the tournaments that you want to go till your card runs out."
"I went, no, I'm finished now, Baz. I still played, but I wasn't competitive. In hindsight, I wish I'd have done now. I mean, Barry's always right where money's concerned and business is concerned. If you want to listen to anybody, listen to Barry, because he will make you a very, very wealthy man."

Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 38visitors 6
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026








