“He still has the name, but there’s no player left in that practice room who thinks, ‘Oh dear, I have to play him’” – Vincent van der Voort is seriously concerned about Michael van Gerwen
PDC
Michael van Gerwen continues to struggle for form. The three-time world champion was knocked out by Mensur Suljovic in the second round of the Swiss Darts Trophy last weekend.
ADVERTISEMENT
The manner of the Dutchman’s defeat is what particularly concerns Vincent van der Voort. The former professional darts player sees little sign of progress from his close friend and wonders whether Van Gerwen is doing enough to rediscover his best form.
On the Darts Draait Door podcast, Van der Voort analysed Van Gerwen’s performance in Basel. He was at the tournament and saw the Dutchman put up a decent fight against Suljovic early on. After a few legs, however, things went badly wrong. Van Gerwen lost control of his throw and could barely put his Austrian opponent under pressure.
“It simply has to be a question of form and confidence,” Van der Voort said. “We all know what he has thrown in the past, so it’s not as if he can’t do it.”

Michael van Gerwen lost to Mensur Suljovic in the second round of the Swiss Darts Trophy
“A lot of time needs to be put into that”
Suljovic is known for his slow pace and ability to disrupt his opponents’ rhythm. Van der Voort, though, does not want to blame the defeat on that. In his view, the problem began with Van Gerwen himself, who produced too many uncharacteristic misses.
“But it starts with those misses of his. They don’t exactly help your confidence. You don’t throw darts like that when you’re in top form. You can see—and this is a recurring theme—that a lot of hours need to be put in. That hasn’t happened lately.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Van der Voort’s criticism centres mainly on the period between the World Grand Prix and the Swiss Darts Trophy. Van Gerwen did lose to Ryan Joyce in the first round of the World Grand Prix, but his game looked considerably sharper then.
The expectation was that he could build on that over the following week and a half. In Basel, however, Van der Voort saw little sign of it. “But you have to conclude that too little happened in that time. He had a week and a half. Looking back, he looked good and composed again at the Grand Prix. You felt he might be about to get going again, but I didn’t feel that at all this time. Not at all. It was all very poor.”
Van Gerwen is increasingly losing to players outside the elite
Van Gerwen’s results have become a recurring topic of discussion. The Dutchman is struggling to produce several strong performances in a row and regularly loses to opponents he would usually have beaten during his best years.
ADVERTISEMENT
Van der Voort believes his former practice partner must face up to the seriousness of the situation. Without a significant improvement, Van Gerwen risks slipping further down the rankings, he says. “If he hasn’t realised that by now, he might as well stop.”
The run of defeats against players outside the world’s absolute elite is particularly troubling to him. Van der Voort names Joyce, Damon Heta, Daryl Gurney and Suljovic among them.
“In this form… Who are you going to beat?! Top form doesn’t just appear out of nowhere. Look at the players he’s been losing to lately: Joyce, Damon Heta, Daryl Gurney and now Suljovic. None of them are world-class.”
Another problem is that Van Gerwen’s early exits mean he rarely faces the circuit’s biggest names. That has often denied him matches against players such as Luke Littler, Luke Humphries, Gerwyn Price, Jonny Clayton and Gian van Veen.
Van der Voort also believes Van Gerwen is not showing the progress needed to rebuild his confidence. “At the moment, every good performance is an isolated incident. You think a good tournament should boost his confidence, but there’s no upward trend.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Read also
Last major success came more than a year ago
During the podcast, Van der Voort and presenter Damian Vlottes tried to identify the last tournament in which Van Gerwen reached his old level across several matches.
They settled on the 2025 World Series of Darts Finals in Amsterdam, where the Dutchman won the title. Since then, he has not managed a comparable performance.
“That was more than a year ago… You can’t keep living off that; it doesn’t work.” Van Gerwen is therefore dealing not only with disappointing results, but also with a change in how his opponents view him.
ADVERTISEMENT
“There’s no player who’s afraid of Van Gerwen anymore”
According to Van der Voort, one of the biggest changes is that players are no longer intimidated when they draw Van Gerwen.
For years, the Dutchman had a psychological advantage before a match even began. The former professional darts player believes that has now disappeared.
“He still has the name, but there’s no player in the practice room who thinks, ‘Oh no, I have to play him.’ The fear is completely gone. Players just outside the elite, like Damon Heta, used to be genuinely afraid. Now they know they can beat him even with an 89 average.”

Kieran WoodDarts Journalist
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He contributes to DartsNews.com, where he covers professional darts through news, match reports, analysis, and live coverage across the PDC calendar and major tournaments.
A key part of his work is on-site reporting from leading events. Kieran has covered the PDC World Darts Championship in person, reporting daily from the venue and providing first-hand insight from the tournament. During his coverage, he has conducted interviews with leading players including Luke Littler, Luke Humphries, and Gerwyn Price.
He is also one of the leading voices of the English-language Dartsnews Podcast, contributing regular analysis and discussion on developments across the professional darts circuit.
In his reporting, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026
- Not even slightly interestedrick6730-10-2026
- And yet the PDC has decided to aggravate this problem by doubling the Players Championship Finals field from 2027. I can't imagine there will be fewer withdrawals next year with even less reason to turn up. I can only hope that a whole slew of Challenge Tour top-up players receive enough prize money in the absence of much of the elite, that some of the more complacent among them struggle to scrape into even a heavily diluted field! More semi-pro players will get to test their mettle, but the standard of competition will be much inferior. It could hardly be said that the Players Championship series will provide an opportunity for darts' second string to test their Tour Card credentials anymore, but at least it will underscore the achievements of those Challenge Tour players of current and previous years, who were able to prove themselves as more than capable of competing with, and beating, the elite of the sport on a consistent basis, and reaping the due rewards.Deduce635828-10-2026
- No point in being there? Champions want to win.Deduce635828-10-2026










