"He was inconsolable" – Vincent van der Voort witnesses first-hand how Van Gerwen takes a heavy blow at the World Series of Darts Finals
PDC
Michael van Gerwen suffered a particularly painful defeat at the World Series of Darts Finals in Amsterdam. The Dutchman seemed on course for the second round against Daryl Gurney, but squandered multiple chances in the closing stages and eventually lost 6-5. Despite the exit, Vincent van der Voort still saw enough positives in his close friend’s display.
ADVERTISEMENT
In the Darts Draait Door podcast, Van der Voort and Damian Vlottes discussed in detail what went wrong. The focus fell on Van Gerwen’s missed opportunities, as he had several moments to seize control of the match.
Gurney made a dream start. “He started brilliantly, didn’t he? The first three legs,” observed Van der Voort. The Northern Irishman opened with visits of 180 and 140 and pinned a 141 finish. Not long after, he added a 170 finish.
Even so, Van Gerwen managed to turn the match completely around. “He turned it around nicely and then forgot to reward himself,” said Van der Voort. “You can see it’s a confidence issue. It shows he’s not quite in a groove right now. But even then, you should still be able to take out 40 with six darts.”
As the match progressed, Van Gerwen’s level rose. His legs got shorter, the scoring improved, and Van der Voort liked his body language. “He really threw well. The darts sat nicely in the board and his head was in a good place. You think: now you’ve got him.”
Precisely for that reason, the defeat stung. In the final leg, Van Gerwen had a golden chance to close it out. With Gurney well back, he stood on 171, but Van Gerwen chose a route that left 131 and then tops.
Van der Voort sees tension in Van Gerwen: “He’s genuinely doing everything he can”
That choice came because Van Gerwen normally prefers to leave double 16. Van der Voort suspected tension played a part. “I think he might have been a little wary of treble 19. But we’ll never know.”
ADVERTISEMENT
At the same time, he immediately added an important caveat. Van Gerwen is not currently in a period where everything flows. “You have to see he’s in a different place now than then. There’s a lot of tension on him at the moment. He’s trying to turn it around and he really is doing everything he can right now. You just want instant results. That doesn’t happen.”
Van Gerwen also told Van der Voort that leaving tops was a deliberate call. “He said to me: ‘Tops was fine all match.’ Which is true. You think: I haven’t missed that yet, so maybe it’s a good choice.”
In the end, Van Gerwen even had six darts to win the match. According to Vlottes and Van der Voort, Gurney had twice put his darts down waiting for the decisive double to land. Still, the Northern Irishman survived and then struck.
Van Gerwen endured a painful night in front of his home crowd at AFAS Live.
“You’d be absolutely sick about that as well”
ADVERTISEMENT
It was no surprise that Van Gerwen was barely approachable afterwards. Van der Voort spoke to him briefly after the match. “Of course he’s absolutely sick about it. He was inconsolable. You’d be absolutely sick about that as well. If not, that would be a problem. He’s trying to turn it around, and I truly believe he will. It just never happens quickly enough. That’s the frustration.”
The former pro sees firsthand how much work Van Gerwen is putting in to lift his level. The day before the match, the two were back on the board together. They once again looked at some technical details in his throw.
“Yesterday we did a session with him at our dart shop and tried a few small tweaks to his throw. The darts flew nicely and sat well in the board. It really looked good. I saw that in patches in this match as well.”
Van der Voort knows these comments have been heard around Van Gerwen more often lately. Still, he remains convinced the three-time world champion can rediscover his form. “I understand many people will think: I’ve heard this a hundred times. I know. But that’s fine. I think he will turn it around. The only question is when.”
He saw enough signs against Gurney to back that up. Over the match, Van Gerwen pushed his average back towards a ton and, after Gurney’s strong start, showed he still has the tools to dictate against top opposition.
ADVERTISEMENT
“That means it’s still in there. That it’s trending upwards,” said Van der Voort. “Then you want to reward yourself. You want to try to be a little better in the next round and get into the match earlier. It’s purely about building the level.”
Read also
In Amsterdam, however, there will be no next step for Van Gerwen. That made the defeat even more bitter, according to Van der Voort. A win would have given him another match to work on form and confidence. “If Michael throws around a 100 average, he troubles everyone and beats almost anyone.”
Now there’s nothing left but to process the disappointment and get back to work. “Take this one on the chin, train at home, and keep building. And try to turn it somewhere.”
Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026
- Not even slightly interestedrick6730-10-2026
- And yet the PDC has decided to aggravate this problem by doubling the Players Championship Finals field from 2027. I can't imagine there will be fewer withdrawals next year with even less reason to turn up. I can only hope that a whole slew of Challenge Tour top-up players receive enough prize money in the absence of much of the elite, that some of the more complacent among them struggle to scrape into even a heavily diluted field! More semi-pro players will get to test their mettle, but the standard of competition will be much inferior. It could hardly be said that the Players Championship series will provide an opportunity for darts' second string to test their Tour Card credentials anymore, but at least it will underscore the achievements of those Challenge Tour players of current and previous years, who were able to prove themselves as more than capable of competing with, and beating, the elite of the sport on a consistent basis, and reaping the due rewards.Deduce635828-10-2026
- No point in being there? Champions want to win.Deduce635828-10-2026
- Littler lost to crabtree in the youth/junior/whatever you call it. He had no point in being there. He's unfortunately now got to the stage,he feels all he has to do is get on the stage to win. Well,I hope he realises part of his fear factor has gone. Happened to Taylor,then van gerwen,and it's causing him to realise pretty sharp,he isn't unstoppable. It's good for the sport,not 1 single player in my 60 years has ever,or will ever be, unbeatable.rick6725-10-2026
- I think it's great to see Mark Webster looking good,good ladrick6725-10-2026
- I agree,I can't believe the lack of coverage of this sad loss. Always enjoyed watching him,but I guess now it's all about littler,well it seems that way. Darts has sadly lost a good manrick6717-10-2026
- In the absence of a report regarding the death of Stefan Lord, I'll assist. An excellent player in the late 70s and early 80s, he actually won the now defunct 3rd place match at two World Championships and a couple of the News of the World Championships. A fabulous player and easily the best Swedish player ever. Rest peacefully Stefan.richieburnettrocks16-10-2026