"I don't have to deal with it, they have to deal with me": Michael van Gerwen fires warning to German crowd ahead of standout battle at World Cup of Darts
PDC
The Netherlands pairing of Michael van Gerwen and Gian van Veen were in good spirits on Saturday as they took down Sweden and survived a scare but managed to win through at the World Cup of Darts.
ADVERTISEMENT
Speaking afterwards to the media including DartsNews.com, Van Gerwen and Van Veen were pleased to get through and showed good team spirit as well as firing a warning to German fans ahead of their battle with the home heroes tomorrow at the World Cup of Darts.
"I think it was okay and here and there I think we played some good darts. After that, because we started missing a few doubles, they started to give them a little bit of confidence. You saw them growing into the game as well with a 155 finish, Oskar (Lukasiak) with nearly a double nine and then a double 14 on the end and then it gives him confidence as well. But I have to admit Jeffrey (de Graaf) played a phenomenal game but overall I think there was only one winner and that was us," said Van Gerwen. "Sometimes you want to do more, you put yourself unnecessarily under pressure but yeah, who cares at the end of the day? We won and that's the only thing that matters."
Van Veen teams with Dutch king for first time
For Van Veen, he added that it was good to get a few questions and answer them early doors than just breeze through. "Yeah, for me 100%. When I saw Northern Ireland win the first game against Belgium, that's a nice way to start the tournament and that's what we did today. We were put under pressure, especially Michael with a couple of finishes. When he put on the pressure, he took them out and I think that's very much more confidence going into tomorrow.
"And I think tomorrow we're going to be under so much different pressure. Today we were, of course, first game, different pressure but we dealt with it well and I think tomorrow we're going to be playing way better than today."
Winning Copenhagen last week, Van Gerwen rubbished any confidence, saying that in reality it's a different event. "I think we can't compare things like that with this tournament. This tournament is totally different. I've never played with Gian before but of course tournaments always help. I also like this tournament and it's the first time now in this format as well for me. It's a new thing and I'm looking forward to tomorrow and I hope we can do even better tomorrow."
ADVERTISEMENT
Read also
Asked to give his thoughts on playing with Van Veen for the first time, MVG as ever had a witty response. "Useless, absolutely useless." As Van Veen jokingly responded. "You know what? I'm walking off."
Having not played pairs before like this all the way through, Van Gerwen said that if he didn't like it he would be honest and that he enjoyed his opening gambit. "Yeah, it was the first time for me and I enjoyed it, definitely. Otherwise I wouldn't say that. Everyone knows I'm always honest but no, I really enjoyed it. Of course a win always helps but you need to make sure you keep believing in your own ability, but not your own ability because you're now playing pairs. You also need to believe in your partner and I think that's what you have to keep believing in."
Van Veen said that MVG does feel like the captain of the team. "We've got four stars in the back of our shirt. Michael's won three of them."

Van Veen teams with MVG finally this year.
ADVERTISEMENT
But Van Gerwen chimed in that it isn't a point of order. "But that doesn't matter. I just want to help. I even said to him, you need to know your strengths, you need to know your weaknesses. If you look at my last 50 games, I probably lost 40 times the bull. I also said to him, "Hey, you start the bull, and what do you do when you win the bull?" You need to trust each other. Try to find your strength because that's how you win tournaments. That's why you're a pair."
"Of course experience helps but you still need to do it on the day. I know his capability. I know this. I know Gian since he was a little kid, you know what I mean? So it's totally different and I really enjoyed to play with him. I said it to him, I said it to everyone and I hope we can go all the way and I can't find any reason why not."
After his much mooted health issues, Van Veen added that it would mean even more to seal the title including with Van Gerwen. "I think it would mean the world to me, of course. The last couple of months have been a bit of a struggle for me but to win this tournament this weekend with Michael, it would mean the world to me. So I'm feeling very confident.
"Back in the day, that was your dream. I tell everyone the truth," joked Van Gerwen and the camaraderie continued for Van Veen. "When I was a little kid I always looked up to Michael. If tomorrow evening we're lifting the title, it would be a dream come true. But it's a long way to go and tonight was just a start and hopefully tomorrow we can pick it up and go further."
Playing with Noppert compared to MVG
ADVERTISEMENT
Van Veen played with Noppert last year and he said that it's different dynamics with Noppert being also a friend and Van Gerwen is the added dynamic of him being the finest Dutch player in history.
"Last year with Danny, I'm really good friends with Danny so we know each other's games inside and out. I know the same with Michael but it's always a bit different. As a Dutchman you always look up to Michael van Gerwen and he's the Dutch number one in the history of this sport. So it's always an honour to play with Michael.
"You're always a bit stressed when you play the first game. I think today was okay. Stop me, I'm going to cry. So it's a big test today. Even though I said I felt confident going into today, you never know what's going to happen when you play with Michael van Gerwen on that stage. But today was okay. I played decent enough. But yeah, it's very much different compared to last year."
Read also
Shout and your throat will hurt - Van Gerwen
ADVERTISEMENT
Next is Germany and Van Gerwen fired a warning that he is used to it and to bring the noise at their peril. "To play Germany is going to be a tough one as well. But if you look at capability, what we are capable of when we're there, I think there can only be one winner. But with pressure, crowds, everything, things can get different.
"We need a good night's rest and prepare really well for tomorrow and then I think we can do some damage tomorrow. I've dealt with it so many times before. I don't have to deal with it. They have to deal with me. That's different. They have to keep shouting against me. The throat is going to hurt."

Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026






