"I walked off the stage thinking, 'I'm playing terribly, but I'm 9-6 in front'" - Gian van Veen digs deep to secure crucial but 'frustrating' win over Wade
PDCWhile not at his best, Gian van Veen has got his knack for winning darts contests back following his World Matchplay run. He confirmed a spot in the semi-finals with a 16-13 win over James Wade in a tie that both players would not reach their A-game at the Winter Gardens.
ADVERTISEMENT
Averaging four points less than his opponent, it was the eye-catching finishing that van Veen produced on a regular basis throughout the tie that helped him charge over the finishing line to better his Matchplay result from last year. 55% of his doubles found the intended target as he continues to search for answers in his scoring game.
Speaking to Viaplay afterwards, he was asked how he found the match. "Good question. I'm really curious how you saw it as well," he began.
"For the first 10 or 15 legs, I was so frustrated with myself. My scoring was so poor, or at least it felt that way. But I was still ahead. I kept leading. My finishing was okay, and I needed it because James wasn't playing well either.
After 15 legs I was 9-6 up. I walked off the stage thinking, 'I'm playing terribly, but I'm 9-6 in front.' So I couldn't really complain. After about the 20th leg, following the fourth break, my scoring improved a lot. It had to, because James also stepped his game up. It was just such a strange match."
A key moment in the match swung the way of van Veen who, out of nowhere, took out a brilliant 160 checkout to go 9-6 ahead. Both players were visibly frustrated with their performances up to that point, but the magic from van Veen boosted his chances of reaching the semi-final, stunning himself in the process.
Read also
"That felt great. It came completely out of nowhere," he said. "I hit it and looked at my manager and my friends in the crowd as if to say, "Where did that come from?" Because my scoring was awful. I think up to that point I'd only hit my first dart in the treble bed maybe twice. Everything else was below it. Then suddenly you take out 160 and think, "How has that happened?" It was a great moment."
ADVERTISEMENT
It was not the first time something similar like that occurred. "To be honest, it's been happening all tournament, and even for the last few months. My first dart keeps dropping below the treble. I don't know why, but it's happening too often. That's definitely something I'll have to look at after the tournament. But I'm still in it. I'm in the semi-finals."
Focused on the task at hand amid simmering frustrations
Van Veen is one win away from becoming the world number two, but it does not feel like that when you watch him play. These last few months have not been very satisfactory for the Dutchman. Early exits on the ProTour and European Tour have become more of a theme with the failure of making it into the Premier League Darts finals night.
"It's really difficult because it starts affecting your thoughts," he acknowledged. "You know that if James suddenly starts throwing 12-darters, you're in trouble. That's how it felt. Normally, in every match, I feel like I can produce an 11, 12 or 13-dart leg whenever I need it. Today I didn't have that feeling."
ADVERTISEMENT
Not a good feeling. 'The Giant' was doing that for fun at the end of 2025, clinching the European Championship while reaching the final of the PDC World Darts Championship with some impressive performances. Now suddenly doubting his game, he felt relieved that the 2007 champion did not showcase his best darts that night.
"I genuinely thought that if James played his best game, I'd lose," he noted. "Fortunately, he didn't, so I got away with it. Towards the end my scoring improved, and my finishing kept me alive. I wasn't just hanging on because I was leading, but my finishing allowed me to stay in control. Before you know it, you've got the match in your hands."
Read also
Blocking out the hostile crowd
Wade, normally one for taking crucial chances, failed to at one stage. From 11-9 down, 'The Machine' dragged himself level at 11-11 before missing the 121. Van Veen stayed in character and took out 67 to regain the lead.
ADVERTISEMENT
He was not short of confidence after that. "Of course it did. I knew my finishing was good. My scoring wasn't great, but I knew I could finish my way through this match, and that's exactly what happened." The 24-year-old confirmed that Wade had converted that outshot twice, one before and one after the missed bull in the 23rd leg. "He's the new Jonny Clayton," he joked.
"But strangely enough, he missed it. I felt he missed a few more chances than you'd normally expect from James Wade. I'm very grateful for the opportunities he gave me. Breaking him for 14-12 with that 118 checkout was a lovely moment. Towards the end I realised the crowd were behind him. They were booing me, and I probably shouldn't have reacted to that."
On the topic of that 118 outshot, it was met by a barrage of whistling and jeers, backing the Englishman on stage over van Veen. He blocked it out and gave a reaction towards the crowd. While it felt good at the time, he feels regret in doing that.
Gian van Veen showed some passion on stage enroute to defeating James Wade 16-13 at the 2026 World Matchplay
"I probably shouldn't have done it. But at that moment it felt good. Looking back you can say it wasn't the smartest thing, but I enjoyed it because they were booing me. It felt satisfying to hit that finish."
ADVERTISEMENT
It continued throughout as van Veen remained clinical on the outer ring. "The next one was the 64 checkout — treble seven, 17, tops. They were whistling then as well, and I took that one out too. Those finishes are what got me through. Even if your scoring isn't good enough, those checkouts are the reason you're standing in the semi-finals. It was a real battle."
Price next in the semi-finals
At the end of the day, averages and stats did not matter as van Veen was in the semi-final in Blackpool. "During my Sky Sports interview on stage I saw that James averaged 97 and I averaged 93," he stated. "That's now the third match in a row where my opponent has not averaged over 100, but I'm still through. To be honest, I couldn't care less about the averages. My finishing was good enough, and I'm through to the semi-finals."
Van Veen is starting to get used to this scenery in a major tournament. His semi-final will be against the dangerous Gerwyn Price who, similarly, has not played his best stuff at the Gardens enroute to this stage. It is a first last four appearance in his third Matchplay campaign for van Veen, and a fourth ranking major semi-final appearance.
Read also
ADVERTISEMENT
"Lovely. I'm really looking forward to tomorrow," he commented, looking ahead. "Tomorrow my scoring has to be much better. I know that. That's what we're aiming for. If I can match Gerwyn Price in the scoring phase, then I believe I can beat him on the doubles. That's the goal tomorrow.
"My scoring definitely needs to improve, but even when you're not playing your best, winning like this gives you a huge amount of confidence. As Bobby George always used to say: "Scoring is for show, doubles are for dough."

Lucas MichaelDarts Journalist
Lucas Michael is a darts journalist and reporter based in Cambridge, UK, and has been part of the DartsNews team since 2025. He covers professional darts through reports, analysis, round-ups, and live coverage, with a focus on clear context and accurate reporting across the PDC calendar.
A key part of his work is liveblogging major tournaments throughout the year, providing real-time updates, match coverage, and contextual reporting across the professional circuit. He also reports regularly from events on site and has covered the PDC World Darts Championship from the venue, delivering first-hand insight throughout the tournament.
Within the newsroom, Lucas works closely with the editorial team and supports coverage alongside Chief Content Officer Samuel Gill and reporter Kieran Wood.
Lucas holds a BA (Hons) in Sports Journalism. In his work, he places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating content promptly when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026







