“It felt like I was done with darts” – Noa-Lynn van Leuven doubted after a major decision on her darts future
PDC
Noa-Lynn van Leuven has spoken about the impact her exclusion from women’s tournaments has had on her darts career. The Dutch player says she was completely blindsided by the new regulations and even felt in the first weeks that her time in the sport might be over.
ADVERTISEMENT
The Darts Regulation Authority (DRA) introduced new rules that prevent transgender women from competing in women’s competitions. In the run-up to that decision, the darts authority commissioned research by developmental biologist Dr Emma Hilton. The report concluded that “multiple small sex differences add up and, in darts, create an advantage for men over women.”
For the 30-year-old Van Leuven, the decision came out of the blue. The Dutch player had already made history as the first openly transgender participant at the PDC World Darts Championship and became the first transgender player to win a title on the Challenge Tour. The new regulations, however, instantly turned her season on its head.
"Well, to be fair, it actually got me by surprise. I didn't know something like this was going on. I wasn't expecting it and also not really in the middle of a season," said Van Leuven to Weekly Dartscast. "And like I've said before, the reasons why I just don't get them. But yeah, it is what it is, I guess.”
"It actually felt like I was done in darts"
Van Leuven had already claimed six titles on the PDC Women's Series and reached the semi-finals of the Women’s World Matchplay. Due to the rule changes, however, ‘The Duchess’ is no longer allowed to compete on the Women’s Series.
That forced her to completely rethink her plans for the rest of the season. Van Leuven is now focusing on WDF events and the Challenge Tour, but admits the initial blow hit particularly hard.
“Well, to be fair, in the first few weeks, it actually felt like I was done in darts. But like I also said, I'm not ready to step away from the game. I just want to keep playing the game and I enjoy it way too much."
ADVERTISEMENT
At the same time, Van Leuven notes it has become significantly harder to keep her career on the same track. “But it's being made a whole lot more difficult to play darts for me right now."
Her participation in WDF tournaments also has a different complexion at the moment. Where qualifying for the Lakeside World Championship would normally be a clear target, Van Leuven considers that option unrealistic given the late point in the season.
“If I'm playing WDF events right now, I'm not playing them because I want to reach Lakeside because I don't think I can, because I only have like two months left and there's not that many tournaments.
Van Leuven made her World Darts Championship debut in 2025 against Kevin Doets.
Season turned upside down
ADVERTISEMENT
The Challenge Tour was already on Van Leuven’s schedule. She mainly wanted match practice to keep developing her game. The new regulations, however, suddenly made that tour a much bigger part of her season.
"I wanted to play them to improve my game. Then the news came out and I was like, yeah, I can play them and I can try to improve my game."
Even so, the uncertainty over how to structure her darts year did not disappear. “But my whole season just got kind of blown up. So, I don't know what to do. I don't know how to have fun in darts. And I was like, yeah, am I gonna spend the money to take the trip over to the UK?"
The financial side also plays a role. For international tournaments, Van Leuven often has to travel to the United Kingdom, while entry fees are mounting.
"The entries are quite high. So, I was like, yeah, am I gonna do that to try and find fun in darts again? Or am I going to stick to things I know?"
ADVERTISEMENT
Read also
Van Leuven ultimately opted for a different approach. Instead of focusing solely on the usual tournaments, she decided to use her new situation to explore other countries and events. "Or am I going to try to see a little bit more of the world? And so I did. I went to Sweden.
The contrast with twelve months ago is stark, Van Leuven says. Where her season then had a clear structure, she is now trying to find her path again within the sport. “I went to Switzerland. I'm hoping to catch one or two more WDF events this year. Yeah, it's a bit different than a year ago.”
Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026