“I’ve always had a lot of time for Mensur. I just think he overstepped the mark in that game” – Joe Cullen reflects on spat with Suljovic at the World Darts Championship
PDC
Joe Cullen has been part of professional darts for almost two decades. On his best days, the Englishman can beat anyone. But those who follow his career also know there’s another side to the story: stretches where his level fluctuates and results dip.
ADVERTISEMENT
In a candid chat with Online Darts in Swansea, Cullen reflects on a turbulent spell—from his early-season form to the much-discussed match against Mensur Suljović at the World Championship.
Cullen started the season with a positive outlook. He says his form is solid, mainly because he has simply put more work into his preparation. Yeah, the form’s been good," says Cullen. "I’ve put a bit of work in for a change, so yeah, I’m playing alright. I think even in the games I’ve been losing I’m still playing okay."
He sees that as a key difference from some phases in his career. The Englishman has often shown he can achieve big things, but just as often his level has dipped. “It’s been a positive start to the year,” he continues. “so now it’s about making it continue rather than just tailing off a little bit.”
Asked when he decided things had to change, Cullen laughs. “It flicks every year, to be fair,” he says. “I’m my own worst enemy. When I practise I’m a better player, when I don’t practise I’m not."
Read also
Cullen believes the sport has become so strong that talent alone is no longer enough. “There are that many good players now that there are no easy draws. You need to be on it from the first game."
The extra work is starting to pay off. His results early in the year have already earned him spots at multiple European Tour events. “I’ve started okay. I’m not pulling up any massive trees, but I have started alright. It’s secured me the next few European Tours and things like that, so yeah — it’s been a decent start."
ADVERTISEMENT
One key target for Cullen is clear: returning to the top 16 of the world rankings. “A lot of people think the top 32 is very important,” he says. “but nothing really comes with being in the 32 apart from getting to the Worlds. The top 16 is the place to be.”
Cullen held that spot firmly for a long time but slipped over the past year and a half. “I was in there for a long time and I’ve slipped out over the last 18 months or so. I’m trying to get back in there.” That, he says, also requires a different mindset. “Do I’m working hard for a change.”
The aftermath of the clash with Mensur Suljovic
One of the most talked-about moments around Cullen at the last Worlds was his defeat to Mensur Suljovic. Afterward, he openly vented his frustration, particularly about his opponent’s pace and behavior during the match.
Looking back, Cullen admits emotions were running high. “At the time I was so angry,” he says. “The emotion just comes out straight away because you’re that annoyed.” Yet with some distance, he can also be critical of himself.
ADVERTISEMENT
“But ultimately he averaged 81 and I got beat by an 81 average. I can moan all I want and say he did whatever he did, but he didn’t play well and he still beat me.”
That doesn’t mean Cullen is fully retracting his earlier remarks. "I think Mensur didn’t play the game like it should be played and knew exactly what he was doing — as most people would agree.”
At the same time, he stresses his relationship with the Austrian has always been good. “The hardest part was that I’ve always got on with Mensur. If it’s someone you don’t like, it’s easier to take your anger out a bit. But we’ve always got on really well, so that annoyed me a bit more.”
The tension between the two has largely faded now. Cullen says Suljovic approached him recently. “He actually came up to me last week in Wigan and got my number because he wants me to do an exhibition in Germany with him."
To Cullen, that sums it up. “I’ve always had a lot of time for Mensur. I like him as a person — he’s a nice man and he’s got a lovely family. I just think he overstepped the mark in that game.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Read also
Remarkably, Cullen faced the Austrian again shortly after on the ProTour. This time there was no controversy. “He played fantastic that day,” says Cullen. “He played the game properly, there was nothing untoward in the game. He played well, he was the better player and he won.” Cullen couldn’t resist telling him so. “I said to him, 'You can play properly — well done, congratulations.'’”
The debate around player conduct on stage has flared up more often recently in darts. Michael Smith also spoke out about similar situations. According to Cullen, there is already a rule to curb unsporting behavior. “There’s already a rule there about persistent gamesmanship."
That, Cullen believes, puts referees in a tough spot. “I think referees are put in an awkward position. I think there should be someone independent making those decisions — someone not directly involved in the game.”
He draws a clear line between slow play and deliberate mind games. “A good example is Michael Barnard," Cullen explains. "He was so, so slow, but he couldn’t get out of your way quickly enough. He threw his last dart and moved straight away. There was no gamesmanship — he was just a slow player.”
ADVERTISEMENT
According to Cullen, the real issue lies in everything that happens in between. “People playing slowly is fine. But some people know exactly what they’re doing between visits. I’ve always been of the opinion that if you don’t think you’re good enough to beat someone just by letting your darts do the talking, then that’s gamesmanship."
Read also
The UK Open as a fresh opportunity
With the UK Open around the corner, Cullen sees a new chance to climb the rankings. Due to his current position, he has to enter the tournament earlier this year. “It’ll be a bit different for me this year because I’ve got to play in the afternoon session, which I haven’t done for probably ten years," he says.
Historically, the tournament hasn’t particularly suited him either. “I haven’t got the best record there either, as you know,” he says with a laugh. Still, Cullen mainly sees it as an opportunity. “But every event is a chance to add to the rankings. I’m making somebody beat me and not just rolling over, I’m fine with that."
ADVERTISEMENT
That, he says, is the difference between acceptable and frustrating defeats. “’m a bad loser, but I’m fine with losing if someone beats me. If someone plays well and beats me, that’s fine."
One of Cullen’s most striking statements is his belief that he structurally belongs among the world’s top sixteen. "My career is nearly 20 years now," he says. "I don’t think there’s ever been a consistent period where I’ve worked hard for a full year."

Cullen is currently ranked 34th on the Order of Merit
He gives a recent example. “Last year I worked hard at the start, got to the final of the first Pro Tour event and won another early one. Then I thought, 'Right, that’s put me back into the European places — I can relax a bit.'”
But then the focus slipped. “But it doesn’t work like that anymore. There are too many good players and you get found out quickly, especially on the Pro Tour." Still, Cullen remains convinced of his abilities. “I believe I’m a minimum top-16 player, but the last couple of years suggest I’m not. I’m where I am because of myself. I’m working hard and I hope that continues."
ADVERTISEMENT
Finally, the role of social media comes up. Cullen has often faced criticism in the past after emotional moments on stage. He can laugh about it now. “I actually see it from the public’s perspective,” he says. “People thinking, “Here he goes again.”
Yet he also uses that as motivation. “But I do use it as motivation and normally play well when people write me off.” But will he still show that publicly as often? “Maybe I’ll just keep it to myself next time,” Cullen says with a smile. “Hopefully get a few fans back on board instead of getting slated all the time.”
Read also

Lucas MichaelDarts Journalist
Lucas Michael is a darts journalist and reporter based in Cambridge, UK, and has been part of the DartsNews team since 2025. He covers professional darts through reports, analysis, round-ups, and live coverage, with a focus on clear context and accurate reporting across the PDC calendar.
A key part of his work is liveblogging major tournaments throughout the year, providing real-time updates, match coverage, and contextual reporting across the professional circuit. He also reports regularly from events on site and has covered the PDC World Darts Championship from the venue, delivering first-hand insight throughout the tournament.
Within the newsroom, Lucas works closely with the editorial team and supports coverage alongside Chief Content Officer Samuel Gill and reporter Kieran Wood.
Lucas holds a BA (Hons) in Sports Journalism. In his work, he places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating content promptly when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026






