Nathan Aspinall and Luke Humphries stunned on opening night of World Matchplay by Dutch dynamos Nijman and Van Veen
PDC
On a night which was meant to be all about Luke Humphries and Nathan Aspinall as two box office attractions turned into a nightmare as Dutch darting dynamos Gian van Veen and Wessel Nijman sent two of the big names packing at the World Matchplay.
ADVERTISEMENT
Van Veen recorded a momentous 10-8 win over defending champion Humphries and now opens up the draw as he faces Danny Noppert in the next round who also won on the opening night.
Van Veen hit a 180 to open up as he looked to take the tie to Humphries. He hit another to leave 41. He missed two darts to break. Humphries missed double eight but Van Veen returned for double 16. That was an early sign that the young Dutchman meant business.
Van Veen doubled his lead pinning double 16 before Humphries finally held throw with a 56 checkout on double 10. Humphries hit double eight to make it 2-2 as he averted the early pressure from Van Veen.
Humphries headed into the break with a flourish pinning 146 for 3-2. Van Veen broke back though going 4-3 up as Humphries' doubling started to go awry. He was throwing for a sudden 5-3 lead. But Humphries broke back for 5-5. Van Veen broke straight back and held.
A 127 checkout saw Humphries break back for 6-6. They both held throw for 7-7. But Humphries kept missing doubles and Van Veen went 8-7 up. Van Veen hit double eight as he made it 9-7 and Humphries was sat on the point of no return.
Van Veen got a shot at 161 for the win. He missed the bull though to send Humphries home. Humphries had a shot at 80 and saved his skin on double five but Van Veen was throwing to win. Win he did as he sealed it 10-8.
ADVERTISEMENT
| Luke Humphries | VS | Gian van Veen |
|---|---|---|
| 95.69 | Average (3 Darts) | 98.45 |
| 21 | 100+ Thrown | 23 |
| 15 | 140+ Thrown | 10 |
| 3 | 180 Thrown | 8 |
| 146 | Highest Checkout | 73 |
| 2 | Checkout 100+ | 0 |
| 28.6 | Checkout percentage | 40 |
| 8 / 28 | Checkout | 10 / 25 |
Nijman sends fans favourite Aspinall home
That wasn't all though as Wessel Nijman sent home another of the favourites for the title in Nathan Aspinall.
Nijman was steely, determined and quite frankly sublime as he battled the heat and the fans on his Winter Gardens stage. Often a player who has shown quality without a coming of age, he showed why he is the business.
He opened up with a 4-1 opening session barrage of Aspinall. A 70 checkout saw Nijman continued his emphatic doubling display as Aspinall just had to watch on in awe.
ADVERTISEMENT
Nijman missed 161 for a 6-1 lead. Aspinall was 1/8 on his doubles and took aim at 76. He pinned double 20 though to hold. Aspinall hit back with a box-office 121 checkout on the bull for 5-3.
Truly special from the young Dutchman.
Nijman missed 74 to make sure he led 6-3 and the fans of Aspinall rallied. The fans' favourite gave them something to roar about as he made it 5-4. But Nijman hit a 68 checkout on double 16 to make it 6-4 at the break.
Aspinall went one behind again at 6-5. Nijman hit a 52 checkout though smack bang in the middle of the double 16. Aspinall had his usual terrier spirit but Nijman was 7-5 up. A 76 checkout saw Aspinall grimace and Nijman went two away.
Aspinall hit straight back with a 121 checkout on the bull smack bang in the middle to break straight back. Nijman put a 180 on a pin and hit another to leave 41 as Aspinall's break was cancelled out again. Nijman missed the bull for the win.
ADVERTISEMENT
Aspinall had a 150 checkout to stay involved. He missed double 18 for 9-7. It was his last act as Nijman pinned double eight.
Noppie pounces on Menzies misery
Noppert who the aforementioned Van Veen faces next pounced on what was a bit of a nightmare of another kind for Cameron Menzies.
Danny Noppert won 10-2 as 'The Freeze' took advantage of a very poor Menzies who again seemed to feel it on the big stage as he wrangles with the nerves. He came in as the third top ProTour player alongside Josh Rock and Martin Schindler.
But it was an all too familiar story for the Scot who didn't manage himself well on the stage. To start, Menzies was broken with Noppert steadfast in his mission pinning 104 for 2-0. It was a debut to forget for Menzies who busted 178 and Noppert returned for a double break on double two.
ADVERTISEMENT
At the first break, Noppert was 5-0 up. He returned from the break and still continued to saunter ahead. He went 6-0 up with no end in sight to a horror debut for Menzies. Noppert hit double 10 for what was a 7-0 lead.
Noppert missed double four for a 70 checkout as Menzies took aim pinning double 12 with a wry smile as he made it 7-1.
Menzies added another leg to make it 8-2 at the break but he was still sinking on the Blackpool stage and sink he did as Noppert returned for the finishing touch.
Wade lays down a marker
ADVERTISEMENT
While it was a night for the Dutch players, it was James Wade who left a marker in only the way he can. He eased past Joe Cullen with a 104.44 average. His highest ever at the Winter Gardens.
Wade was at his sumptuous best and sits in that Van Veen/Noppert section so could yet be a player to watch again this next week. 'The Machine' at his best is very hard to stop.
Wade hit a first 180 and looked like a man who meant business. He pinned double 20 for the opening leg. He couldn't produce Wade magic though not able to get a shot at 156 and after a good leg, Cullen broke for 1-1.
Amid all the big names going out, James Wade continues on.
Wade broke again and was looking to finally hold to go into a 3-1 lead in a race to ten. A hold he got on double 20. Wade was in sparkling form leaving a double after 12 again.
ADVERTISEMENT
He pinned double 20 to lead 4-1 averaging close to 108. Cullen had darts to break. He hit double 14 with Wade couldn't get a shot at 150 so he went 4-2 down.
Cullen bust 108. Wade left 65 while Cullen looked at it again and chased around the board. Wade broke back on double 10 to make it 5-2. Wade made it 6-2 to hold throw.
Wade hit a 64 checkout on double 20 to break again going 7-2 up. Wade hit a 48 checkout. Cullen hit a 140 checkout but it was a late flourish too late as Wade won through 10-3.
Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026