Luke Humphries stamps authority ahead of business end with fourth ProTour title of 2026 in Players Championship 33
PDC
Luke Humphries is the king of Leicester time and time again. He has won his third ProTour title at the Mattioli Arena and his fourth overall of 2026 alone; no other player has won more in a venue that often hosts the Players Championship series.
ADVERTISEMENT
Humpphries won the World Grand Prix also just last month, and he continues to dazzle ahead of a busy business end to the season, including the Grand Slam of Darts next week, and he defeated Niels Zonneveld 8-4 in the final in the penultimate ProTour of the season.
Humphries does it again!
One that saw a lot of familiar faces in the back end of the event and scores to settle ahead of Minehead, one place that Humphries compared to some of his rivals will be at as he likely heads towards signing off his ProTour campaign if he doesn't play tomorrow.
Humphries had a tough run in towards the final as he saw off Gary Anderson in the semi-finals, averaging close to 105. While he defeated Gerwyn Price before that 6-2 with a 92 average.
Humphries scoops another title.
Steve Lennon was the victim in the Last 16 and was defeated 6-2 with a 96 average for 'Cool Hand Luke'. This was after his two biggest averages of the day in the form of 109 against Tom Bissell, winning 6-0, and the same scoreline as he saw off Darius Labanauskas with a 106 average.
Archie Self was the first vanquished 6-0, albeit with a meeker 85 effort. Niels Zonneveld, on the other hand, treaded a path of seeing off mostly Dutch talents.
ADVERTISEMENT
Michael van Gerwen, who produced the performance of the day with an 114 average, was defeated in the semi-finals as his attempt to win another ProTour leaves him one more day to fight. He lost 7-5. Dirk van Duijvenbode was defeated 6-4.
While Jeffrey de Zwaan (6-1), Justin Hood (6-4), Jack Aldridge and also Ritchie Edhouse both 6-4 saw Zonneveld move through.
In the final, won by Humphries 8-4, he started superbly. A 180 for Humphries after Zonneveld hit one earlier in the leg loomed as the former hit 41 for double 12 to go 1-0 up. A 104 from Zonneveld made it 1-1.
81 for Humphries on double six to make it 2-1 with Zonneveld back on 170, ready to pounce. Humphries missed 114 for 3-1 but returned with Zonneveld back on 216. He hit double 20 for it. Zonneveld hit 59 for 3-2, with Humphries sitting waiting to pounce. Humphries was set to throw for 4-2. 80 pinned by Humphries to make it 4-2, as Zonneveld was now throwing for 4-3.
An 82 checkout for Zonneveld to make it 4-3. Humphries threw for 5-3. 106 missed by Zonneveld, and Humphries clipped double 20 for 5-3. Zonneveld missed 80, and Humphries was back for 6-3. A break for 'Cool Hand Luke'.
ADVERTISEMENT
Read also
Humphries missed 170, Zonneveld missed 130 and Humphries returned only to miss chances at 7-3. Zonneveld hit double 20 for 6-4 to break back. Zonneveld missed chances to make it 6-5, and Humphries was back for 80 but missed two darts.
Zonneveld missed three more, including at double three, and Humphries hit double 10 to make it 7-4, and he was throwing for the win. An 85 checkout, and Humphries was the champion.
Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 2visitors 2
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026
- Not even slightly interestedrick6730-10-2026
- And yet the PDC has decided to aggravate this problem by doubling the Players Championship Finals field from 2027. I can't imagine there will be fewer withdrawals next year with even less reason to turn up. I can only hope that a whole slew of Challenge Tour top-up players receive enough prize money in the absence of much of the elite, that some of the more complacent among them struggle to scrape into even a heavily diluted field! More semi-pro players will get to test their mettle, but the standard of competition will be much inferior. It could hardly be said that the Players Championship series will provide an opportunity for darts' second string to test their Tour Card credentials anymore, but at least it will underscore the achievements of those Challenge Tour players of current and previous years, who were able to prove themselves as more than capable of competing with, and beating, the elite of the sport on a consistent basis, and reaping the due rewards.Deduce635828-10-2026
- No point in being there? Champions want to win.Deduce635828-10-2026