"Michael used to let you know that he was the best. Luke doesn't need to do that" – Justin Hood sees a big difference between Littler and Van Gerwen
PDC
Justin Hood made a big impression at the last World Darts Championship, but is still waiting for a real breakthrough on the ProTour this season. The Englishman admits he still isn’t putting in as many training hours as he should. At the same time, Hood sees up close how Luke Littler keeps raising the bar for the rest of the circuit. He also believes we still haven’t seen the best of the world champion.
ADVERTISEMENT
"I haven't done what I should be doing”
Hood is not unhappy with his own performances. He points out his level over a long period is good enough to compete with many strong Tour Card holders. Even so, the European Tour qualifiers remain a stumbling block.
“I've been playing well. I think throughout the year I'm 15th or 16th on the averages, over 100. I'm playing a good level,” Hood told Oche180. “I get the third-day blues for the qualifiers. I seem to struggle on there, but hopefully I'll put that right next year. Better diet and just feeling better in myself."
Those qualifiers usually follow two days of Players Championship action. For Hood, that accumulation isn’t Yeah, as you know, dart players aren't exactly the healthiest people. We're trying to get better with it. But three days for me, it's a long time."
Mentally, such a day can be tough too. "And especially the first event, if you didn't get through that, you're a bit down in the dumps and you've got to try and get yourself back up mentally. And sometimes it just doesn't work like that."
During the Worlds, Hood said he wanted to take his career more seriously and train more. He admits that hasn’t happened enough yet. "I haven't done what I should be doing. I think I'm playing a bit better because I'm a bit more confident after the World's and a bit more set financially. I think more players are more wary of playing me now, whereas they didn't know me last year. Yeah, I haven't put the time in as I should, but I'll come in time hopefully."
The hectic darts circuit makes it tempting, Hood says, to leave the darts at home for a while. "I think it's because we're away so much. We're practising while we're away and playing darts. So when you get two or three days off, you don't really want to chuck a dart."
ADVERTISEMENT
Hood was one of the revelations at the last World Darts Championship, reaching the quarter-finals on debut.
“There’s no limit to how good Luke can get”
Hood is especially forthright about Littler’s development. The two have known each other for a while, and Hood saw the young Englishman dominate even before he established himself among the absolute elite.
"There's no limit to how good he is. I've known Luke a long time and I thought when he got on the tour, he might struggle with losing a few games. When I knew him at MODUS, he was just dominating that and I thought, get on the Pro Tour, you're playing Michael, Gerwyn Price, Humphries at the time," said Hood.
Hood therefore expected Littler to run into defeats a bit more often at first. The opposite happened. "I thought he's going to start losing a few, but he's taken to it like a duck to water and he's starting to dominate now. I think his level, he's got another 10-15 points on his average, unfortunately for us all, but we've got to try and beat him while he's playing like this and he's averaging 110 now, so I don't think I've got any hope."
ADVERTISEMENT
He also notices that Littler’s presence changes things behind the scenes. "Yes, Luke's not like Michael was. He doesn't walk in and make a big song and dance that he's there or he just walks in, does what he does and sits down, plays his game, then beats whoever's in front of him. I noticed a bit of a shift in people looking when he's walking in, but yes, he's just amazing anyway."
Yet Hood now sees the same aura around Littler that Van Gerwen had in his absolute peak years. "Yes, exact same aura. He just doesn't make a loud noise about it. His darts do the talking. Michael's did as well, but Michael used to let you know that he was the best. Luke doesn't need to do that."
Hood doesn’t find that dominance boring at all. On the contrary, a player who stands above the rest motivates him.
"As a player, I love to see a dominant player because it gives us something to aim for. If it was all shared round, I'd get a bit... Well, anyone can win.
"Now it's like, Luke, we want to shoot for Luke. Same with Humphries. I think he's the only player in the world that can beat Luke."
ADVERTISEMENT
Hood also puts Luke Humphries in the absolute top bracket.
"I know he hasn't in the last few in finals, but he can beat him. I love to see players like that. Michael, when he was doing it, and Phil, we used to love watching it."
The dominance reminds Hood of earlier eras. "It makes me want to practise harder and get to their level."
“Want to prove a point every time I'm there”
Hood showed he has plenty of quality most clearly at the Worlds. On the big stage, he sometimes even performs better than at the weekly floor events. He sees a logical reason for that.
ADVERTISEMENT
'll get there one day. It's just how much time I want to put in. The thing is, with the Worlds, I prepare for a game, then I've got potentially a week break to get ready for the next one. And on the Pro Tours, you're pretty much playing every week. So I'll go home and I'll sit down for two days and be like, oh, I'm going to be back out there soon anyway. That World Championship was only once a year.
Read also
That makes it tempting to take a step back during a few days off. At the Worlds, that mindset is different. "I want to prove a point every time I'm there. And I will again this year."
Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026
- Not even slightly interestedrick6730-10-2026