The big names continue to tumble at the 2025 World Matchplay albeit perhaps not as big of a shock as last night as Peter Wright and Rob Cross led the exile of top names from Blackpool.
ADVERTISEMENT
Wright produced a spirited comeback but in the end, 'Snakebite' was well beaten by Jermaine Wattimena who of course reached a major final last year and has been part of a spate of resurgent talents as of late. Wright has not found his form in some time.
Wright began the tie leading the way but Wattimena rallied superbly with a 138 checkout to draw level against 'Snakebite'. From there it was a dominant run as Wattimena took control reeling off four legs on the spin to lead 4-1 at the first interval.
He continued to extend that out as he held throw with a 74 checkout for 6-2. Wright hit back though and asked the question, he hit double 16 for 7-5 down and Wattimena narrowly held throw for 8-6.
Wright asked the question making it 8-8 pinning double 16 but Wattimena broke straight back to curtail the comeback with Wright missing darts to hold and lead. Wattimena from there hit double eight to seal the win.
| Peter Wright | VS | Jermaine Wattimena |
|---|---|---|
| 93.1 | Average (3 Darts) | 91.81 |
| 21 | 100+ Thrown | 21 |
| 10 | 140+ Thrown | 15 |
| 4 | 180 Thrown | 4 |
| 93 | Highest Checkout | 138 |
| 0 | Checkout 100+ | 1 |
| 53.3 | Checkout percentage | 34.5 |
| 8 / 15 | Checkout | 10 / 29 |
Defiant Dirk downs Cross
Dirk van Duijvenbode also paid heed to Rob Cross's time in Blackpool in a superb recovery mission from 'The Titan' who came from 6-2 down to dump out Cross 10-8.
ADVERTISEMENT
Cross led early producing a superb 128 checkout to lead 5-2 with a 107 average. But amid the darting clinic saw Van Duijvenbode clipping on his heels. He headed into the next break at 6-4 down as Van Duijvenbode asked the question of Cross who was still averaging 104.
A question he couldn't answer as Van Duijvenbode roared back to hit a 180 to leave 33 which he took to make it 7-7. The catalyst towards victory was in fact an incredible tops tops 137 checkout to lead for the first time going 8-7 up.
From there he averted a potential decider hitting double four to claim the win and he joins Wattimena, Van Veen, Nijman and Noppert from Holland in the next round.
Prior to that it was Glory Glory Goldfinger as Andrew Gilding crashed in a superb 10 maximums to defeat Damon Heta in a tie-break tussle.
ADVERTISEMENT
It was a 12-10 win for Gilding in a match that initially saw Heta go 4-1 and 5-2 up on the former UK Open champion but his lead continued to narrow. A juncture in the middle section of the tie saw them both break each other constantly as they jostled for position.
Gilding thought he had the break as he went 6-5 down and levelled at 6-6. But Heta hit a sublime 130 to go 8-6 down. Gilding had a repost of his own with a 104 checkout to go 8-7 down and broke again for 9-8 but just as it looked like victory beckoned.
Back came Heta as they both exchanged break after break into a thrilling tie break but averaging 101, Gilding prevailed breaking for 11-10 then holding for a 12-10 win.
Delightful De Decker denies Chisnall
To conclude the session, it was World Grand Prix champion Mike de Decker fresh from being confirmed on the World Series in Australia who lived up to his billing as he took down Dave Chisnall 10-7.
ADVERTISEMENT
De Decker surged into a 3-1 lead to begin proceedings but Chisnall broke back to bring it back on throw at 3-3 and it was a war of atrition from there as both continued to hold.
Chisnall looked to have the impetus as he made it 7-6 with a break but De Decker cancelled it out after two darts were missed and he held from there from 8-7.
De Decker hit a 104 checkout to go one away, broke throw to go to the brink and then from there won supremely with a 148 checkout. This means that so far all Dutch speaking players are through to the next round - the World Dutchplay if you will.
| Dave Chisnall | VS | Mike De Decker |
|---|---|---|
| 91.87 | Average (3 Darts) | 92.35 |
| 12 | 100+ Thrown | 15 |
| 13 | 140+ Thrown | 10 |
| 5 | 180 Thrown | 5 |
| 118 | Highest Checkout | 116 |
| 1 | Checkout 100+ | 2 |
| 28 | Checkout percentage | 52.9 |
| 7 / 25 | Checkout | 9 / 17 |
ADVERTISEMENT
Milly ThomsonLive Darts Blogger
Milly Thomson is an aspiring journalist with a deep-rooted passion for a wide range of sports, including football, darts, and cricket. She recently completed her university studies, earning a BA (Hons) in Football Business and Media—a degree that has given her a solid foundation in both the commercial and communications aspects of the sporting world.
Milly combines her academic background with her genuine enthusiasm for sports to produce engaging and insightful coverage across multiple disciplines. Her writing reflects a strong understanding of the games she follows, as well as a keen interest in the stories behind the athletes and events.
As she continues to grow in the field of journalism, Milly is committed to using her voice to inform, entertain, and connect with fellow sports fans. With a clear focus on developing her skills and expanding her portfolio, she is excited to contribute meaningful content to the wider sporting community.
claps 5visitors 5
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026