Preview – Premier League Darts Play-Offs: Can Luke Littler, Gerwyn Price or Jonny Clayton prevent Luke Humphries from retaining his title?
PDC
After 16 weeks, Thursday evening, 28/5, it’s finally here: the Premier League Darts 2026 play-offs have arrived. Luke Humphries, Luke Littler, Jonny Clayton, and Gerwyn Price will battle it out on Finals Night to decide who takes the title.
ADVERTISEMENT
Littler goes in as the number 1 seed. The Nuke captured six nightly titles in total and amassed an impressive 41 points. He won 24 matches in this competition. Jonny Clayton is second, having won no fewer than four nights and, together with the 19-year-old world champion, stood head and shoulders above the rest of the field.
Humphries qualified as number 3. Although he spent a long time outside the qualifying places, he found another gear in the closing weeks, grabbed a nightly win, and booked his play-off spot after all. The final berth is for Gerwyn Price. The Iceman won two more nights than Humphries, but was also knocked out early more often, which left him on 24 points, three fewer than Cool Hand Luke.
How advantageous is it to finish top of the league table?
Since the new format in 2022, we’ve seen different players finish number 1 in the overall standings. But how many number 1 seeds actually went on to win the Premier League on Finals Night? In the first edition under this format, Jonny Clayton racked up a superb 40 points, powered by four nightly wins, to qualify as top seed for the play-offs. On Finals Night he met fourth seed Joe Cullen in the semi-finals, and it was the Englishman who sprang a surprise with a convincing 10-4 win. Despite a strong Premier League campaign, Clayton did not lift the title, which that year went to Michael van Gerwen.
A year later, another Welshman topped the league. Gerwyn Price reached eight finals that season, winning four nights. That earned him 39 points and the top seeding on Finals Night. Although he swept past Jonny Clayton 10-2 in the semi-finals, he too couldn’t convert favoritism into silverware. Michael van Gerwen was again the strongest in the final, meaning that for the second year running the best performer over the season did not take the title.
Read also
In 2024, the number 1 seed finally did win the Premier League. On his debut, Luke Littler claimed four nightly victories and finished on 40 points. In the play-offs he beat Michael Smith 10-5 in the semi-finals, setting up a showdown with his namesake Luke Humphries. The then 17-year-old prevailed 11-7, marking the first time since the format change that the league leader went on to lift the trophy.
ADVERTISEMENT
For now, that’s the only instance, because last year Luke Humphries won the Premier League as the number 2 seed. In the regular season, Luke Littler again dominated, with six nightly titles and a total of 45 points. The world champion reached the final just like the year before, where he again faced Luke Humphries. This time, Cool Hand Luke turned the tables on his rival, and he could call himself Premier League champion for the first time in his career.
League leaders and eventual champions since the format change
| Year | Regular-season number one | Eventual champion |
| 2022 | Jonny Clayton | Michael van Gerwen |
| 2023 | Gerwyn Price | Michael van Gerwen |
| 2024 | Luke Littler | Luke Littler |
| 2025 | Luke Littler | Luke Humphries |

Littler is the only player who finished top of the league and then went on to win the Premier League.
Premier League Darts 2026 Finals Night schedule
ADVERTISEMENT
Thursday, 05/28 (from 8:00 PM)
O2 Arena, London - Play-Offs
| Time | Player 1 | v | Player 2 | Round |
| 8:15 PM | Luke Littler | v | Gerwyn Price | SF |
| 8:45 PM | Jonny Clayton | v | Luke Humphries | SF |
| 9:45 PM | Winner SF1 | v | Winner SF2 | F |
Luke Littler v Gerwyn Price
Luke Littler once again showed, just like last year, that he is currently the best player in the world. The 19-year-old needed the first four weeks to find his rhythm and did not reach a single final in that spell. From week five, however, The Nuke caught fire. In Cardiff he claimed his first nightly title by defeating Jonny Clayton in the final. Two weeks later, on Night Seven in Dublin, he added a second nightly win.
ADVERTISEMENT
A week later, he immediately captured his third nightly title in Berlin by defeating Michael van Gerwen in the final. That also put him top of the table for the first time. After two weeks without a final, he returned to the decider on Night 11, but this time he lost to Jonny Clayton. From Week 12, however, “The Nuke” hit full throttle, winning three weeks on the spin to firmly take control of first place.
Gerwyn Price had a more up-and-down Premier League. In Week One he lost his opening match, before claiming his first nightly title on Night Two in Antwerp. From Weeks Three to Six he won his opener each time, but lost in the semi-final on every occasion. On Week Seven in Dublin he made another final, but was edged out 6-5 by Luke Littler in a last-leg decider. Two weeks later in Manchester he finally won another night, taking his tally in this campaign to two.
At that point, the Welshman seemed to be cruising toward the play-offs, but from Week 10 things quickly went downhill for “The Iceman.” He lost his opening match three weeks in a row. On Night 13 he won his first match, only to fall again in the semi-final. In the last three weeks he also went no further than the semis, which saw him slip back to fourth place and scrape into Finals Night.
But who is the favorite for this semi-final based on head-to-head? All signs point to Luke Littler. In 27 previous meetings, “The Nuke” has beaten the Welshman 19 times. Price has come out on top eight times. They have already met six times in the Premier League this year, and Littler won every one of those matches. On those numbers, the 19-year-old world champion would be a clear favorite to reach the final.
Read also
ADVERTISEMENT
Jonny Clayton v Luke Humphries
Jonny Clayton made a superb start to his Premier League. After two semi-finals in the opening weeks, he landed his first title on Night Three. In Week Five he returned to the final, but this time lost to Luke Littler. A week later in Nottingham he did claim his second title by defeating Luke Humphries in the final.
From Night Seven, the Welshman’s momentum stalled. “The Ferret” failed to win his opening match three weeks running, which dropped him to third place. After that, Clayton found form again. He took back-to-back nightly titles and also reached the final in Week 12. In the last four weeks, however, he lost his first match three times, and thanks to Littler’s surge he finished second.
For Luke Humphries, this year’s Premier League was a real struggle. He failed to reach a final in the first five weeks, leaving him sixth at that stage. In Week Five he finally made a final, but lost it to Jonny Clayton.
In the next six weeks, he went out in his opener four times, so after 12 weeks he was still sixth and his place at Finals Night looked under real threat. But from Week 13 Humphries’ engine began to fire, and he reached four straight finals, winning one on Night 15. With Michael van Gerwen and Gerwyn Price both faltering in the closing weeks, he climbed to third and secured a play-off spot after all.
ADVERTISEMENT
On league position alone, Clayton would be the favorite. But what about the head-to-head? Clayton and Humphries have faced each other 17 times, with “The Ferret” leading 10 wins to seven. Looking only at the Premier League, they have met four times this year. The Welshman also took three of those. Humphries’ only win over Clayton came on Night Seven in Dublin.

Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026







