"I’ve gone from Negative Nelly to Positive Perry!": James Wade left flummoxed by level of play with sudden change of mindset
PDC
James Wade reached the World Matchplay quarter-finals for the 14th time in his career on Wednesday night after defeating Ryan Searle 11-8. The experienced Englishman was typically candid afterwards, expressing surprise at his performance and paying tribute to the role his wife continues to play behind the scenes.
ADVERTISEMENT
The reaction Wade showed on stage had been interpreted as emotion, but he viewed it differently. “Not emotional. Very elated,” he told DartsNews and others in his post-match press conference. “I didn’t play very well, but I did enough. Elated and emotional are two different things, I believe.”
Wade stunned by 99.85 average
Wade had no idea that he had averaged 99.85 until the figure was put to him during his press conference. “Really?” he responded. “Oh, I played all right then! I thought I was averaging about 90 or 91.”
The statistic immediately changed his assessment of the performance. “I’ve never heard of that! I played all right, then,” Wade joked. “Okay, I’ll restructure my interview! I guess I did enough. I didn’t think I played anything like that, so I’m really happy.”
Wade had felt below his best throughout the contest, but recognised that Searle had given him an opportunity which needed to be taken. “To play someone like him when he isn’t playing well, get away with it and nick a win, I’ll bloody take that every day of the week,” he said.
His mood had transformed by the time the true level of his performance became clear. As Wade put it: “I’ve gone from Negative Nelly to Positive Perry!”
ADVERTISEMENT
Read also
A 143 checkout changes the momentum
One of the decisive moments came when Wade produced a 143 checkout. The ten-time major winner is accustomed to seeing opponents land damaging finishes against him and was pleased to reverse those roles.
“They do, and they always happen against me, so it was nice,” he said when asked how much such a finish could hurt an opponent.
Wade had already passed up several opportunities to produce a sizeable checkout before taking out the 143. “I hadn’t really threatened anything like that, but when the opportunity came up, I’d already had so many chances to produce one of those finishes,” he explained. “When I hit that one, I thought, ‘Wallop.’”
ADVERTISEMENT
Searle remained in contention, but Wade felt the finish had pushed his opponent closer to defeat. “It was a nice feeling and I think it pushed him slightly over the edge, even though he wasn’t doing his thing.”

Wade in action at the Winter Gardens
“We did it” – Wade thanks his wife
After completing the victory, Wade clasped his hands and looked towards his wife in the crowd. The gesture was his way of recognising the support she provides during both the successful and difficult periods of his career.
“I was thanking my wife for everything she does for me,” he said. “She puts up with me when I’m a tit, when I do silly things, when I don’t toe the line and when I get stressed and stress out the rest of my family.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Wade believes the strain placed on the families of professional players is often overlooked. Defeats and disappointing performances do not necessarily remain inside the venue, with the frustration frequently carried home. "What people don’t realise about darts players is the stress we put on our families,” he continued. “It’s immense. It’s awful.”
Wade offered a characteristically frank description of life after a poor weekend. “You go home and moan about everything,” he said. “This was wrong, that was wrong, the hotel was wrong, the car was wrong and the flight was wrong.”
His wife has assumed an even greater role since Wade separated from his previous management. “I don’t have management, so my wife is the person who shares that journey with me,” he explained. “I had management until about eight months ago, but they didn’t really look after me. The person who does look after me is my wife.”
The look towards the crowd carried a simple message: “We did it. We did it.”
Read also
ADVERTISEMENT
No psychological advantage against Gian van Veen
Wade will meet Gian van Veen in the quarter-finals, repeating the World Matchplay encounter he won in Blackpool in 2025. He dismissed the suggestion that the previous result would give him a psychological advantage. “There’s no psychological advantage,” Wade insisted. “He’s a great darts player. He’s very, very good.”
Van Veen entered the world’s leading group following his run to the 2026 World Championship final, although Wade believes that result has played a considerable part in his current position. “Without the World Championship run, I don’t think he would be where he is,” he said. “But I’m honest and I’ll say it. He’s a quality darts player.”
Van Veen’s 14-12 victory over Wessel Nijman began earlier than scheduled after Cameron Menzies fell ill and was forced to withdraw from the opening match of Wednesday’s session. Wade felt the disruption placed both Dutchmen in a difficult position. “It was really unfair on him and Wessel to have to step forward and play their game as early as they did,” Wade said. “It was a very big distraction.”
After being informed that his quarter-final would take place two days later, Wade replied: “I’ll get the day after first!”
ADVERTISEMENT
Read also
Mindset matters more than the format
Despite averaging almost 100, Wade does not consider that figure a guarantee of success over the remainder of the tournament. He believes handling difficult matches can prove more valuable than producing the highest average.
“No,” he replied when asked whether 99.85 represented a title-winning level. “I think a 96 average when everybody is struggling wins it more than a 99. But I’m bloody happy. I’ll take that.”
The quarter-finals increase from a race to 11 legs to a race to 16, but Wade rejected the suggestion that the longer format represented a significant step up.
ADVERTISEMENT
“There’s no step up. I’ve just got to get the mindset right,” he said. “My mindset wasn’t right for this game and I’m really, really lucky that Ryan Searle didn’t do his thing.”
Wade nevertheless carried an underlying confidence throughout the match, adding that “the cards were on the table” and he was probably always going to win. He immediately recognised how unusual that sounded coming from him, joking: “That was very confident for me, wasn’t it? Get up, you beauty!”
Van Veen now stands between Wade and a 15th World Matchplay semi-final, with the 2025 runner-up again moving deep into the tournament where he lifted his first major title 19 years ago.

Kieran WoodDarts Journalist
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He contributes to DartsNews.com, where he covers professional darts through news, match reports, analysis, and live coverage across the PDC calendar and major tournaments.
A key part of his work is on-site reporting from leading events. Kieran has covered the PDC World Darts Championship in person, reporting daily from the venue and providing first-hand insight from the tournament. During his coverage, he has conducted interviews with leading players including Luke Littler, Luke Humphries, and Gerwyn Price.
He is also one of the leading voices of the English-language Dartsnews Podcast, contributing regular analysis and discussion on developments across the professional darts circuit.
In his reporting, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026







