Stephen Bunting on the brink, Michael Smith chasing a lifeline - European Championship race set for dramatic climax in Maastricht this weekend
PDC
Stephen Bunting is defending the final European Championship qualification place. Michael Smith needs a late surge to take one. Their paths could collide at the Dutch Darts Championship this weekend, with Maastricht offering the last chance to reach Dortmund after very different European Tour campaigns.
ADVERTISEMENT
Bunting arrives in 32nd place on £33,000, just £2,000 ahead of Karel Sedlacek. Martin Schindler is scarcely more comfortable immediately above him, while Smith’s encouraging return in Basel has kept qualification within reach despite his limited appearances this season.
The field for Dortmund will be settled when the last of this year’s 15 European Tour events concludes on Sunday.
“He’s fighting for more than just qualification for Dortmund,” DartsNews Podcast host Kieran Wood said of Bunting. “It might be a bit dramatic to say it, but it could be his Premier League as well. If he finishes outside the top 32 on the Euro Tour, having been to almost all of them, it’s going to be a big blow for his standing.”
Bunting faces an anxious weekend
A year ago, Bunting qualified for Dortmund as the third seed after winning two European Tour titles. This time, he could slip outside the provisional top 32 before throwing his first dart in Maastricht.
Sedlacek plays Callan Rydz in Friday’s opening round. Victory would take the Czech player to £34,500, above Bunting’s current total and level with Schindler. Bunting does not begin until Saturday evening, when Cameron Menzies or Nick Kenny will be waiting.
ADVERTISEMENT
His second-round defeat to Jeffrey de Graaf in Basel left him without any additional ranking money. Another opening-match loss would leave him stranded on £33,000, relying on results elsewhere. Beating Menzies or Kenny would take him to £38,000.
“Especially after going out early in Basel, this weekend in the Netherlands is massive for him,” Wood said. “I’m very critical when it comes to Stephen Bunting even being in the conversation for another Premier League,” said podcast co-host Nicolas Gayer. “But he’s played in it the last two years, so of course you have to talk about him. That would definitely be a big blow.”
The draw offers little comfort beyond his opener. Should both men progress, Bunting would face Smith in the last 16, with the former world champion needing that victory to keep his own Dortmund hopes alive.

Bunting was number 3 seed in Dortmund last year
Smith has something to build on
ADVERTISEMENT
Smith’s position comes after a much smaller European Tour campaign. Basel was only his fourth appearance of the season, with arthritis and fitness problems forming part of the difficult backdrop to his attempts to recover his best darts.
“I enjoy darts more when Michael Smith is around and playing like that,” Gayer said of his Swiss performances. “He’s just a mesmerising player.”
Smith starts against Stephen Burton on Friday evening, with Nathan Aspinall awaiting the winner. Getting through those two matches would leave him on £30,000, still below the current qualification line. A quarter-final would bring him level with Bunting’s starting total of £33,000; a semi-final would take him to £35,000.
Neither figure guarantees qualification, with the cutoff still capable of rising and equal totals separated by countback. “The question now for Smith is: can he do it two weekends in a row?” Wood said. “He’s still shown in flashes that he’s got that natural talent, because you don’t lose something like that. But it’s the consistency and being able to do it day after day throughout the tournament.”
For Gayer, the uncertainty was whether Basel had been “one of those good days where everything came together”, with pain potentially affecting Smith again the following week. “Or whether he’s actually found something again on the practice board, another good patch of form,” he added.
ADVERTISEMENT
Smith and Bunting occupy the same quarter as Schindler, Sedlacek and newly crowned Swiss Darts Trophy champion Jonny Clayton. Several of the qualification contenders may have to beat one another before they can start looking at results elsewhere.
Schindler could face his closest challenger
Schindler headed to Dortmund as the top seed in 2024 and second seed in 2025. Now, on £34,500, the German number one is trying to avoid missing his home major altogether. “He’s hanging on by a thread,” Wood said. “The way he’s playing, he doesn’t look like he’s going to be adding anything.”
His opening opponent will be Sedlacek or Rydz. Should Sedlacek win on Friday, the pair would meet with identical prize-money totals. A win for Schindler would lift him to £39,500; a win for Sedlacek would take the Czech player to £36,000 and leave Schindler waiting on the rest of the field.
ADVERTISEMENT
Wood’s concern also extended to Schindler’s technique after watching footage of him at an earlier UK Open and comparing his grip with his current action. “There’s an obvious change to his throw, and it’s definitely something to talk about,” said Gayer, who follows the German players closely.
On Schindler’s chances in Maastricht, he agreed with Wood’s pessimistic assessment: “He will probably not add anything to his prize-money total. It will definitely be a close one for Martin in the race for Dortmund.”
Sedlacek reached the quarter-finals in Basel to move within striking distance. “I think we can say this is the best Karel Sedlacek we’ve ever seen on the PDC Tour,” Gayer said. “He’s in really good form and a really good spell of his career.”
Their possible meeting would not automatically eliminate the loser from the qualification race. Kim Huybrechts also starts the weekend on £34,500, while Menzies and Dave Chisnall have £37,000 apiece. Results involving those players could determine how many places remain available to the challengers.
Selected contenders ahead of the Dutch Darts Championship
ADVERTISEMENT
| Player | Position | European Tour total | Maastricht outlook |
| Cameron Menzies | 28 | £37,000 | Faces Nick Kenny, with Bunting awaiting the winner |
| Dave Chisnall | 29 | £37,000 | Faces Jonas Masalin, then potentially Danny Noppert |
| Kim Huybrechts | 30 | £34,500 | An opening win takes him to £38,000 |
| Martin Schindler | 31 | £34,500 | An opening win takes him to £39,500 |
| Stephen Bunting | 32 | £33,000 | An opening win takes him to £38,000 |
| Karel Sedlacek | 33 | £31,000 | Beating Rydz takes him to £34,500; beating Schindler takes him to £36,000 |
| Michael Smith | 35 | £27,000 | Quarter-final needed to match the current £33,000 cutoff |
| Sebastian Bialecki | 36 | £26,000 | Quarter-final needed to move above the current cutoff, to £34,000 |
| Daryl Gurney | 37 | £24,000 | Final needed to move above the current cutoff, to £37,000 |
| Mike De Decker | 47 | £13,500 | Only the title would take him above the current cutoff |
| Ricardo Pietreczko | 55 | £10,500 | Only the title would take him above the current cutoff |
Gurney needs a sustained run
Gurney and Bialecki meet in Friday’s opening round, ensuring one challenger will fall immediately. The winner then faces top seed and reigning European champion Gian van Veen.
For Gurney, even reaching the semi-finals would leave him on £32,000. He needs a place in Sunday’s final to have a chance of returning to Dortmund, where he reached the quarter-finals last year.
“He’s definitely searching for something. We’ve seen him trying glasses this year, but he seems to have dropped them again,” Wood said. “He’s looking for something to get back to that level, or at least stay around the level he’s at now.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Gurney beat Michael van Gerwen at the World Series Finals in Amsterdam, although that non-ranking event offered no help towards qualification for Dortmund. Wood described the victory as “one of the highlights of the year for him”, but remained doubtful about a sustained run. “Gurney nowadays is one of those players where it wouldn’t be a surprise if he beat anyone, but he’s probably going to beat them and then lose in the next round.”
Gurney won the World Cup alongside Josh Rock last year, adding a team title to his World Grand Prix and Players Championship Finals victories. “He’d lost that spot among the absolute world’s elite, but he was still able to stay around 20th to 25th in the world rankings and make some good runs in major tournaments,” Gayer said. “This year feels like another step in the wrong direction.”
Gurney’s opportunity in Maastricht came through the reserve list following withdrawals from the original field. De Decker also received a place, keeping an even more demanding qualification route open.
Read also
De Decker’s struggles outlast expectations
ADVERTISEMENT
De Decker must win the tournament to get above the current cutoff. He starts against Niels Zonneveld, with Krzysztof Ratajski waiting in round two. “A couple of months ago, I would have expected to see Mike picking up form again,” Gayer said. “I thought it was a limited patch of him struggling and searching for form. Now it’s turned into a huge problem.”
“I don’t think he changed supplier at a very good time, because he was at the peak of his powers,” Wood said of De Decker’s equipment switch. “He has one of the most beautiful throws in the game, just in terms of the action, so I think a lot of his problems are mental.
“The equipment switch might not be the problem itself, but it’s made him think about things, knocked his confidence and taken him out of the frame of mind that saw him become a Grand Prix champion.”
Gayer’s assessment went further: “I didn’t expect that crisis to last so long. Now I don’t think you can really call it a crisis any more. This is the current state of Mike De Decker.”
A runner-up finish in Maastricht would leave the Belgian on £26,500, still well short of Bunting’s starting total. Only the £35,000 winner’s cheque would give him a chance of returning to Dortmund.

Mike de Decker needs to win the Dutch Darts Championship to have any hope of making Dortmund
Pietreczko’s recovery faces a stage test
Pietreczko also needs the title to move above the current qualification line. Last year’s Dortmund quarter-finalist opens against Heine Uuldriks, with late replacement Brendan Dolan awaiting the winner following Rob Cross’s withdrawal.
“Before the World Cup, he was averaging in the 60s and 70s and even forfeiting matches,” Gayer said. “It was good to see him back in the 90s quite often. He didn’t win that much, but he’s definitely fixed something in his game.”
Maastricht brings Pietreczko back onto the European Tour stage after those improved floor performances. “We’ll learn how his throw is looking: whether he’s changed something again, whether the struggles are back, or whether he’s completely free of them now,” Gayer said. “For Ricardo, it will be about finding his game again and getting match-fit for next season.”
For Gary Anderson and Joe Cullen, the qualification race is already over. Both are outside the top 32 and absent from Maastricht, ruling them out of the European Championship at the Westfalenhalle from 22–25 October.
The first movement around the cutoff could come much sooner than Sunday’s final. Sedlacek opens Friday’s afternoon session against Rydz, with Menzies against Kenny immediately afterwards. Schindler then opens Saturday’s afternoon session, while Bunting must wait until the evening to respond.

Kieran WoodDarts Journalist
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He contributes to DartsNews.com, where he covers professional darts through news, match reports, analysis, and live coverage across the PDC calendar and major tournaments.
A key part of his work is on-site reporting from leading events. Kieran has covered the PDC World Darts Championship in person, reporting daily from the venue and providing first-hand insight from the tournament. During his coverage, he has conducted interviews with leading players including Luke Littler, Luke Humphries, and Gerwyn Price.
He is also one of the leading voices of the English-language Dartsnews Podcast, contributing regular analysis and discussion on developments across the professional darts circuit.
In his reporting, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026
- Not even slightly interestedrick6730-10-2026
- And yet the PDC has decided to aggravate this problem by doubling the Players Championship Finals field from 2027. I can't imagine there will be fewer withdrawals next year with even less reason to turn up. I can only hope that a whole slew of Challenge Tour top-up players receive enough prize money in the absence of much of the elite, that some of the more complacent among them struggle to scrape into even a heavily diluted field! More semi-pro players will get to test their mettle, but the standard of competition will be much inferior. It could hardly be said that the Players Championship series will provide an opportunity for darts' second string to test their Tour Card credentials anymore, but at least it will underscore the achievements of those Challenge Tour players of current and previous years, who were able to prove themselves as more than capable of competing with, and beating, the elite of the sport on a consistent basis, and reaping the due rewards.Deduce635828-10-2026










