"The last time they were there was in Poland" - Gian van Veen supported by his parents in tough Amsterdam victory
PDC
Gian van Veen is in the World Series of Darts Finals quarter-finals for the first time but was made to work for it after a tremendous performance by Karel Sedlacek. The home favourite averaged 101.52 and hit 53% of his doubles on the outer ring to prevail 10-7 and set up a clash against Dirk van Duijvenbode on Sunday in Amsterdam.
ADVERTISEMENT
It was remarkably tight throughout, with both players lashing blows to each other. Five consecutive breaks of throw saw Sedlacek respond again and again, but eventually van Veen managed to back up his latest break with a hold. He pinned double 16 to win the match, with earlier checkouts of 160 and 147 making for a very commendable showing.
In most scenarios, 'The Giant' would have waltzed away from his opponent, but Sedlacek kept fighting and made a real match of it. Van Veen was satisfied with his performance and the win after speaking to Viaply afterwards.
"In terms of the level, definitely. But I did expect that if I threw like that, I would shake him off earlier," he said. "But that didn’t happen. Karel threw a fantastic match. Every time he was scoring, he was putting me under pressure and I was back on a finish after nine darts. Well, you’ve still got six darts. He was just next to me after nine darts. He was really, really good. I’m glad I could put something up against that today as well."
Hard-fought win a satisfying one
Van Veen can walk away from the oche proud of himself. Not only prevailing as he looks for a second PDC major title, but he defeated someone averaging over 103 with seven 180s thrown into the mix.
He got a lot of enjoyment from this, but that was not felt throughout the match. "Afterwards, yes. During the match, maybe not," he admitted.

Gian van Veen is in a first World Series of Darts quarter-final
ADVERTISEMENT
"Look, it’s nice that you win 10-7, but I’d rather win 10-1 or 10-2 with that kind of game. But when you look back, it does give you more satisfaction. Because you know your opponent is putting you under pressure and you just have to take out a few finishes. You take them all out as well. And then it does give you more confidence and more satisfaction afterwards."
The match was very even throughout. When van Veen got that break, he still had 'Evil Charlie' clawing away behind him. "He just threw a really good match. He put me under pressure every leg. And he also won a few legs where I wasn’t anywhere near him. At one point, I saw on the screen that it was saying that we were at least equal, or maybe even higher.
"He put me under pressure in every leg that I won. And in the legs that he won occasionally, I was still a little bit behind. That’s just down to him. But yeah, that’s also the kind of timing you need."
Another quarter-final for Gian van Veen, as he beats Karel Sedlacek to make the final day in Amsterdam! 🇳🇱#WSODFinals | @GVV180 pic.twitter.com/4my3sDjqJw
— PDC Darts (@OfficialPDC) September 19, 2026
Having his folks watch on
ADVERTISEMENT
For the first time in a while, van Veen had his parents watching on live in the arena. It was a special feeling to perform and win in front of them on home soil. "The last time they were there was in Poland. And I had the final on the European Tour. Before that, it was the World Championship final," he commented.
"Yeah, I lost that one. They’re not there very often, that’s true. But they said beforehand that they couldn’t be here on Thursday evening. But they said, 'If you win, we’ll be there on Saturday afternoon.' And yeah, that’s obviously great for me as well. That they’re there for once and that I then throw well and win. And yeah, I hope they had a great afternoon."
Read also
It would have been a special feeling for them to hear the packed crowd changing their son's name, maybe even a little bizarre. "I think so too, yeah. I’ll ask them about that as well. But I can imagine it. Because I think I’d probably feel the same if I had children. But even as players ourselves, you still get goosebumps sometimes when that happens on the stage. And yeah, it’s not something you get used to quickly, no."
Van Veen will return to the big stage against fellow Dutchman van Duijvenbode in what will be a thrilling tie. Either Josh Rock or Ross Smith will play the winner in the semi-final.
ADVERTISEMENT

Lucas MichaelDarts Journalist
Lucas Michael is a darts journalist and reporter based in Cambridge, UK, and has been part of the DartsNews team since 2025. He covers professional darts through reports, analysis, round-ups, and live coverage, with a focus on clear context and accurate reporting across the PDC calendar.
A key part of his work is liveblogging major tournaments throughout the year, providing real-time updates, match coverage, and contextual reporting across the professional circuit. He also reports regularly from events on site and has covered the PDC World Darts Championship from the venue, delivering first-hand insight throughout the tournament.
Within the newsroom, Lucas works closely with the editorial team and supports coverage alongside Chief Content Officer Samuel Gill and reporter Kieran Wood.
Lucas holds a BA (Hons) in Sports Journalism. In his work, he places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating content promptly when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026
- Not even slightly interestedrick6730-10-2026
- And yet the PDC has decided to aggravate this problem by doubling the Players Championship Finals field from 2027. I can't imagine there will be fewer withdrawals next year with even less reason to turn up. I can only hope that a whole slew of Challenge Tour top-up players receive enough prize money in the absence of much of the elite, that some of the more complacent among them struggle to scrape into even a heavily diluted field! More semi-pro players will get to test their mettle, but the standard of competition will be much inferior. It could hardly be said that the Players Championship series will provide an opportunity for darts' second string to test their Tour Card credentials anymore, but at least it will underscore the achievements of those Challenge Tour players of current and previous years, who were able to prove themselves as more than capable of competing with, and beating, the elite of the sport on a consistent basis, and reaping the due rewards.Deduce635828-10-2026
- No point in being there? Champions want to win.Deduce635828-10-2026
- Littler lost to crabtree in the youth/junior/whatever you call it. He had no point in being there. He's unfortunately now got to the stage,he feels all he has to do is get on the stage to win. Well,I hope he realises part of his fear factor has gone. Happened to Taylor,then van gerwen,and it's causing him to realise pretty sharp,he isn't unstoppable. It's good for the sport,not 1 single player in my 60 years has ever,or will ever be, unbeatable.rick6725-10-2026
- I think it's great to see Mark Webster looking good,good ladrick6725-10-2026
- I agree,I can't believe the lack of coverage of this sad loss. Always enjoyed watching him,but I guess now it's all about littler,well it seems that way. Darts has sadly lost a good manrick6717-10-2026
- In the absence of a report regarding the death of Stefan Lord, I'll assist. An excellent player in the late 70s and early 80s, he actually won the now defunct 3rd place match at two World Championships and a couple of the News of the World Championships. A fabulous player and easily the best Swedish player ever. Rest peacefully Stefan.richieburnettrocks16-10-2026








