“There's nothing better than standing on stage with the crowd behind you” - Raymond van Barneveld refuses to give up despite recent struggles
PDCRaymond van Barneveld finally notched a much-needed win on the UK Open stage on Friday afternoon. The 58-year-old Dutchman edged out Czech player Karel Sedlacek in a thriller: 6-5. The victory only came after Van Barneveld survived multiple match darts against him, but he ultimately battled back. The relief afterwards was clearly visible for the five-time world champion.
ADVERTISEMENT
Van Barneveld knew beforehand he was in for a tough afternoon at the UK Open. Sedlacek had beaten him in all four of their previous meetings. The Dutchman was therefore on guard when he saw the draw. “He’s really been making strides lately, he’s playing well,” Van Barneveld said afterwards. “I was definitely on notice.”
No exaggerated warning
That warning proved justified. On the Minehead stage, Sedlacek seized the initiative early. The Czech threw solidly and capitalized on a sluggish start from Van Barneveld. In no time it was 5-2 on the board and the match looked done. Sedlacek even had multiple chances to close it out. But that was precisely when the momentum turned.
The Czech missed his match dart, giving Van Barneveld another chance to stay alive. The Dutchman grabbed that moment with both hands. Leg by leg he clawed his way back and forced a deciding 11th leg. There he showed that his experience can still be of huge value. With a strong final leg, Van Barneveld ultimately took it 6-5.
Read also
Release
The release at the end was immense. Van Barneveld admitted the match was anything but smooth, mainly because he struggled to bring his practice level to the stage. “I thought: how is this possible?” he said candidly afterwards. “Behind the scenes it often goes well, but once you’re on that stage, sometimes it’s one 60 after another. Still, I kept fighting. I kept believing. In the set-up and in myself. It goes 5-5 and the last leg was just fine.”
ADVERTISEMENT
For Van Barneveld, the win comes at an important moment. His season had started extremely poorly. After a disappointing World Championship, he decided to step away from the sport for a moment and went on a two-week holiday to Thailand. There he tried to clear his head and recharge. He also experimented with a new set of darts, hoping to regain some confidence in his game.
The results had been disappointing so far. In the first six tournaments of the year, Van Barneveld bowed out in the first round no fewer than five times. His averages hovered around the eighties, which is simply too low for a player of his caliber. The criticism therefore didn’t let up. Here and there, some even cautiously suggested that the Dutch darts veteran might be better off quitting.
Van Barneveld himself isn’t thinking about that for now. “It’s still just so much fun,” he stressed. “There is nothing better or more thrilling than standing on that stage with the crowd behind you.” Still, he understands it can look different to outsiders. The in-match frustration can be visible and sometimes gives the impression he has lost the joy. “That’s because you often fall flat on your face,” he explained. “But I’m super happy with this win. We can build on this.”
Read also
ADVERTISEMENT
Working with Rafael van der Vaart
When Van Barneveld says “we,” he refers to a striking new partnership. Former top footballer Rafael van der Vaart has offered to guide him. The former Netherlands international is a huge darts fan and sees ways to help Van Barneveld rediscover his form. According to Van Barneveld, Van der Vaart has already reached out actively. “He texted me this afternoon,” the darter said. “His father Ramon and some people around them are going to draw up a plan for me next week. I’m very curious to see what that will be.”
The Dutchman is visibly touched by the involvement of Van der Vaart and his entourage. It means a lot to him that people from outside the darts world want to step in to help. “I’m really moved by the enthusiasm of these people,” said Van Barneveld. “That people like Rafael care about me makes me happy and proud.” Whether the partnership will actually lead to sporting success will become clear in the coming months. For now, Van Barneveld is mainly grateful. “Fantastic, lovely people,” he concluded. “It means a lot to me that they’re working with me. Whether a lot or nothing comes of it, they’ve won my heart for the rest of my life.”
Van Barneveld ultimately lost 10-1 to Wessel Nijman in the fourth round of the UK Open, but thanks to the win over Sedlacek and Van der Vaart’s proposal, he once again has something to hold on to.
Read also
ADVERTISEMENT

Kieran WoodDarts Journalist
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He contributes to DartsNews.com, where he covers professional darts through news, match reports, analysis, and live coverage across the PDC calendar and major tournaments.
A key part of his work is on-site reporting from leading events. Kieran has covered the PDC World Darts Championship in person, reporting daily from the venue and providing first-hand insight from the tournament. During his coverage, he has conducted interviews with leading players including Luke Littler, Luke Humphries, and Gerwyn Price.
He is also one of the leading voices of the English-language Dartsnews Podcast, contributing regular analysis and discussion on developments across the professional darts circuit.
In his reporting, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026







