"Visually, it looked 10 times better" - Netflix's Beat Luke Littler inspires call for World Darts Championship shake-up
PDC
Almost a week has passed since Netflix's 'Beat Luke Littler', but the event is still generating plenty of discussion. According to Paul Nicholson, the streaming giant demonstrated how darts could be introduced to a much wider audience. The former professional was impressed by several aspects of the production, although he also had some strong criticism of the presenters and certain decisions made by the organisers. In particular, comedian Lee Mack failed to win him over.
ADVERTISEMENT
The event in Manchester gave amateur darts players and other selected contestants the opportunity to beat Luke Littler in a single leg and win £501,000.
Ultimately, Fallon Sherrock walked away with the top prize. Her participation and victory sparked considerable debate, but the way Netflix presented the event also attracted a mixed response.
Nicholson, who now works as a pundit and commentator, watched the show with particular interest. In an extensive analysis for Sporting Life, he discussed both the strengths and weaknesses of the event.
"He didn't have enough knowledge about darts"
Netflix chose Gary Lineker, best known for his long career in football broadcasting, to front the show. He was joined on the panel by Richard Osman, Laura Turner and Lee Mack.
Nicholson believes the involvement of such high-profile names was significant in itself. "I think it was big for darts that we had someone as big as Gary Lineker presenting it with a panel of Richard Osman, Laura Turner and Lee Mack because it shows how we've become more mainstream."
He was also impressed by the presentation area's design, suggesting that it could offer a glimpse of how darts might be broadcast in the future. "I was impressed with the visual side of that presenting desk and maybe that's where darts goes from here rather than being inside a studio at the back of the Ally Pally."
ADVERTISEMENT
However, Nicholson was less convinced by Lineker's contribution as a presenter. While the former England footballer can draw on decades of experience when discussing football, Nicholson felt his knowledge of darts was lacking.
"However, did Gary do a great job for a darts event? When he's fronting football coverage he can obviously lean on a lot of his experience but he didn't have enough knowledge about darts."
Nicholson believes Laura Turner was largely responsible for giving the panel the necessary depth of analysis. "Thankfully Laura was there for darts knowledge and she was magnificent in giving the panel the credibility it needed."
Richard Osman also impressed the Australian. The television presenter and author is a well-known darts enthusiast, and Nicholson felt that enthusiasm came across clearly. "I thought Richard was fantastic due to his clear passion for the sport."
His assessment of Lee Mack was considerably less complimentary, however. Despite the comedian's previous involvement in celebrity darts events, Nicholson questioned what he had brought to the broadcast.
ADVERTISEMENT
"Lee Mack was a bit out of place and didn't add anything positive to the show. I know he's played celebrity darts in the past but if you were going to cut someone from that desk, it would be him."

Gary Lineker, Richard Osman, Laura Turner, Angry Ginge and Lee Mack at Beat Luke Littler on Netflix
"Visually, it looked 10 times better"
Despite his criticism of the presenting team, Nicholson was largely positive about the production as a whole. The arena's appearance and the contestants' entrances particularly caught his attention.
"There were a few things that were a bit unnecessary such as someone coming out of a bin, and then Jayden Walker being dressed up as a schoolboy but overall I thought the production itself was excellent. I think one of the things I particularly liked was how good the central walk-on looked."
ADVERTISEMENT
The contestants entered through the middle of the crowd rather than approaching the stage from the side, a change Nicholson believes the PDC should consider when the World Darts Championship moves into its new arena at Alexandra Palace.
"So, when we go to the World Championship in a new room at Alexandra Palace, if they do not do a central walk-on, then they've missed an opportunity, because that really was eye-catching."
For Nicholson, the visual difference compared with the traditional entrance was striking. "Visually, it looked 10 times better than the usual kind of walk-on from the side. The whole arena and atmosphere was great."
The introductory videos featuring each contestant were another aspect of the production he enjoyed. Nicholson felt they gave the programme the atmosphere of a television talent show, in keeping with the way Netflix had promoted the challenge. "I did like aspects like the profile videos for every contestant to give it that X Factor feel because ultimately that's how it was pitched to the public."
ADVERTISEMENT
"Netflix didn't read the room brilliantly"
Not every creative decision made by Netflix met with Nicholson's approval. One particular frustration was the promotional trailer, which was set in a traditional British social club. He felt it presented an outdated image of modern darts. "I didn't like that the trailer was set in a social club because darts has changed so much now."
Nicholson pointed to the considerable development of the sport in recent years, particularly the growth of youth academies. He would have preferred Netflix to highlight the next generation of players instead. "You could have done it in an academy surrounded by kids and parents and things like that."
Although he acknowledges that pubs and social clubs still have an important place in darts, Nicholson believes the sport's future lies elsewhere.
"Darts has moved on and although we still play in social clubs and pubs, the future superstars aren't coming from there anymore. They come from academies and they come from schools."
ADVERTISEMENT
Given that Netflix had selected several talented teenagers, including Mitchell Lawrie and Jayden Walker, Nicholson found the decision to use such traditional imagery particularly strange. "So, I don't think Netflix read the room brilliantly, especially as they'd selected top teenage talent to appear on the show."
Read also
"Why not Beat Ronnie O'Sullivan or Beat Andy Murray?"
Despite identifying several areas for improvement, Nicholson sees considerable potential in the concept. He even believes Netflix could extend the format into other sports. "I think as a concept for Netflix, it's very, very good. If they're going to do 'Beat Luke Littler' just this once and leave it, then fair enough."
However, he would be interested in seeing the streaming platform develop an entire series built around famous sports stars. "But I think, moving forward, it might be good for them to do a 'Beat...' series and have something like 'Beat Ronnie O'Sullivan' in a frame of snooker or even 'Beat Andy Murray' in a game of tennis, for example."
ADVERTISEMENT
Nicholson also sees an opportunity to revisit another idea that has been discussed in darts circles for some time: a Royal Rumble of Darts. "I've heard plenty of people saying the concept proves that there would be mileage in the Royal Rumble of Darts idea that we've previously spoken about."
While there is no indication that the PDC intends to introduce such a format, Nicholson suggested Netflix could be particularly well suited to staging it, given its existing relationship with WWE.
"Whether the PDC ever do it, I'm not sure, but maybe it's something more up Netflix's street, especially because of their partnership with WWE. It's a match made in heaven isn't it? And they could even use star wrestlers to cross promote it."
The growing crossover between darts and professional wrestling is already evident in Littler's interactions with WWE star LA Knight, something Nicholson believes could help bring such an event closer to reality. "I've even seen that Luke Littler was getting voice notes from LA Knight recently doing content, so if he's getting that level of attention then maybe it's just a matter of time."
For Nicholson, the appetite among fans could ultimately determine whether the idea ever becomes reality. "If the public want that, they have to make some noise and it’s more likely to happen."
ADVERTISEMENT

Kieran WoodDarts Journalist
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He contributes to DartsNews.com, where he covers professional darts through news, match reports, analysis, and live coverage across the PDC calendar and major tournaments.
A key part of his work is on-site reporting from leading events. Kieran has covered the PDC World Darts Championship in person, reporting daily from the venue and providing first-hand insight from the tournament. During his coverage, he has conducted interviews with leading players including Luke Littler, Luke Humphries, and Gerwyn Price.
He is also one of the leading voices of the English-language Dartsnews Podcast, contributing regular analysis and discussion on developments across the professional darts circuit.
In his reporting, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026
- Not even slightly interestedrick6730-10-2026
- And yet the PDC has decided to aggravate this problem by doubling the Players Championship Finals field from 2027. I can't imagine there will be fewer withdrawals next year with even less reason to turn up. I can only hope that a whole slew of Challenge Tour top-up players receive enough prize money in the absence of much of the elite, that some of the more complacent among them struggle to scrape into even a heavily diluted field! More semi-pro players will get to test their mettle, but the standard of competition will be much inferior. It could hardly be said that the Players Championship series will provide an opportunity for darts' second string to test their Tour Card credentials anymore, but at least it will underscore the achievements of those Challenge Tour players of current and previous years, who were able to prove themselves as more than capable of competing with, and beating, the elite of the sport on a consistent basis, and reaping the due rewards.Deduce635828-10-2026
- No point in being there? Champions want to win.Deduce635828-10-2026







