
Adam Paxton has questioned the financial reality facing players towards the lower end of the PDC rankings, arguing that Tour Card holders are increasingly expected to operate as full-time professionals without being guaranteed the income to do so.
ADVERTISEMENT
The 26-year-old is currently 98th on the PDC Order of Merit with £30,750 in ranking prize money, having earned his first two-year Tour Card at Q School in 2025.
Now in the second season of that card, Paxton believes something needs to change for players trying to establish themselves below the sport's biggest earners.
"I think there's got to be something," Paxton told Oche180 when the possibility of allowing lower-ranked players to compete in events such as the MODUS Super Series was raised. "Whether it be allowing us to play in other tournaments and it not be so monopolised, or it goes back to that whole thing: should we be paid? I think we should be."
"It's very top-heavy"
Paxton has earned £19,000 in ranking money during 2026, but much of that has come through a string of early-round wins on the Players Championship circuit rather than one major run.
He has reached the last 64 at 11 Players Championship events this season, alongside two appearances in the last 32. With travel and accommodation costs attached to each ProTour block, Paxton believes the money available at the earlier stages can make a significant difference.
"Does a first-round winner need the extra £250?" he questioned. "It's nice when you do, but when you don't, say you've got two ProTours, that extra £500 at least covers, or mostly covers, costs for the week. Something isn't quite... Obviously, it's very top-heavy for one reason. It's great for PR. It's great to say, 'Oh, the winner's won X, Y, Z.' It's not great for the people who don't qualify, or who are further down the rankings and getting the odd win here and there."
ADVERTISEMENT
Paxton's best Players Championship result since gaining his Tour Card remains a last-16 appearance at Players Championship 34 in 2025, while his two deepest runs this season have both ended in the last 32.
Read also
"So why can't it?"
During the interview, Paxton was also asked about the comparison with professional snooker, where minimum earnings have previously been made available to Tour Card holders.
"It does, really," he said when asked whether he was surprised darts had not followed a similar route. "Especially, as you say, the snooker's covered. Darts... I watched the Matchroom documentary on Netflix, and they say darts is the biggest moneymaker. So why can't it?"
ADVERTISEMENT
Paxton then pointed towards another change to life on the PDC circuit which he believes has increased the pressure on lower-ranked professionals.
Players Championship events were once predominantly staged at weekends, but the circuit has increasingly moved into midweek dates. For anyone attempting to retain conventional employment alongside professional darts, that presents an obvious difficulty.
"And, as I say, it went from the weekend to then midweek to force you to become a professional darts player, as opposed to working alongside playing darts," Paxton explained. "But then it takes away your... They're like, 'Well, we're not paying you, though.' So we're not paying you to be a professional darts player and for it to be your job, but you're going to have to give up your job, or at least part of it, to be a darts player. So it doesn't quite work, I don't think."
Read also
Could lower-ranked players be allowed to play elsewhere?
ADVERTISEMENT
One alternative raised with Paxton was greater freedom for players outside the world's top 64 to compete away from the PDC circuit and supplement their earnings elsewhere.
The MODUS Super Series was specifically mentioned during the discussion. Paxton knows that circuit himself, having won a weekly MODUS Super Series title in 2024 before earning his PDC Tour Card the following January.
Raymond van Barneveld has also previously received special dispensation from the PDC to compete at the World Seniors Darts Championship while holding a Tour Card.
For Paxton, either opening more of those opportunities to lower-ranked players or introducing greater financial support within the existing system would help address the issue. "I think there's got to be something," he said. "Whether it be allowing us to play in other tournaments and it not be so monopolised, or it goes back to that whole thing: should we be paid? I think we should be."
Paxton has increased his ranking earnings from £11,750 during his first season on Tour to £19,000 so far in 2026, but remains outside the top 64 as the final months of his initial two-year Tour Card approach.
ADVERTISEMENT

Kieran WoodDarts Journalist
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He contributes to DartsNews.com, where he covers professional darts through news, match reports, analysis, and live coverage across the PDC calendar and major tournaments.
A key part of his work is on-site reporting from leading events. Kieran has covered the PDC World Darts Championship in person, reporting daily from the venue and providing first-hand insight from the tournament. During his coverage, he has conducted interviews with leading players including Luke Littler, Luke Humphries, and Gerwyn Price.
He is also one of the leading voices of the English-language Dartsnews Podcast, contributing regular analysis and discussion on developments across the professional darts circuit.
In his reporting, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 13visitors 2
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026







