
At the WDF World Championship, we have now reached the third day. Sunday there are again a lot of matches from the first and second round of the men's and women's tournament on the program. Among others, four-time women's world champion Lisa Ashton will be in action for the first time.
ADVERTISEMENT
In the first match of the afternoon session, Sybren Gijbels may try to follow in the footsteps of his compatriots Brian Raman and François Schweyen, both of whom have already qualified for the third round. Gijbels, who is making his debut at a World Cup will take on Kevin Luke in the first round. The 46-year-old American was there once before at the WDF World Championship, when he lost 2-0 to Steve Hine in the first round in 2022.
Next it is the turn of Lorraine Hyde and Mayumi Ouchi. For Hyde it is her third participation in the WDF World Championship, last year she lost in the second round 2-0 to the later world champion Beau Greaves. Ouchi also has some experience at Lakeside, last year she went down 2-0 in the first round against Kirsty Hutchinson.
Read also
In the third match of the afternoon session it sees the 21-year-old James Beeton face off with his nine-year elder opponent Bradley Kirk, is a debutant at this World Championship. Afterwards follows another women's match. In it, 67-year-old Paula Jacklin, who was called up for this World Cup only late after Mary-Anne Teinaki canceled, will take on Paula Murphy. Jacklin never made it past the first round in seven previous participations; her American opponent also reached the quarter-finals last year, but lost 2-0 to Greaves.
The afternoon session will conclude with the match between Edwin Torbjörnsson and Shane McGuirk. It will be interesting to see if McGuirk can reach the same level as in his opening match against Mark Barilli. The Irishman had an average of 92.81 and is the only player who averaged over 90 for the time being.
In the evening session, Aaron Turner and Jeff Springer will be first in action. Turner, husband of Laura Turner, lost to Ricky Nauman in the first round last year, for American Springer it is his debut at a World Championship.
Ashton
And then it's the turn of the biggest name in the program on Sunday. Lisa Ashton, four-time world champion with the BDO, will take on Sophie McKinlay in her opening match. For the 18-year-old Scot, who won the WDF Europe Cup in youth this year, it will be her debut at a World Championship.
ADVERTISEMENT
Lisa Ashton goes hunting for her fifth world title
Afterwards, with Cliff Prior against Scott Walters, we get another all-English duel. Prior, this year's winner of the Welsh Classic, is making his debut at a World Championship. Walters already was in action in the opening round, defeating Craig Brown 2-0.
With Nicole Regnaud against Wandy Harper, the penultimate match of the evening is an all-New Zealand duel. Regnaud went down 2-1 against Aileen de Graaf in the second round last year. Harper won her opening match this year by defeating Gréta Tekauer 2-0.
Rounding out the evening will be Mike Gillet and Ky Smith. Gillet is there for the second consecutive year at the World Championship, last year the Welshman went down 2-1 against Liam Maendl-Lawrence in the opening round. Smith attended the PDC World Championship in 2022, but makes his debut at this year's WDF.
Live stream for Lakeside 2024
ADVERTISEMENT
Although the tournament cannot be televised in the UK until finals weekend, interested parties can follow the tournament via a live stream. All operations will be broadcast on the YouTube channel of GREAT! game. This means anyone with an Internet connection can watch all 10 tournament days for free, no matter where they are in the world.
Distribution of prize money at Lakeside 2024
The total prize pool for the WDF Lakeside World Championship includes £221,000 in prize money. That is a lot less than in 2023, when it was £257,000.
The main prize for the winner of the men's and women's tournament did remain the same. The winner in the men's will take home 50,000 pounds in prize money. The winner in the women's will receive a check for 25,000 pounds.
Format
ADVERTISEMENT
Gentlemen
First round: Best of 3 sets
Second round: Best of 5 sets
Third round: Best of 5 sets
Quarterfinals: Best of 7 sets
Semifinals: Best of 9 sets
Final: Best of 11 sets
Ladies
First round: Best of 3 sets
Second round: Best of 3 sets
Quarterfinals: Best of 3 sets
Semifinals: Best of 5 sets
Final: Best of 7 sets
WDF World Championship 2024 Schedule
Sunday, Dec. 1
Afternoon session (from 1 p.m.)
Sybren Gijbels v Kevin Luke (R1 men)
Lorraine Hyde v Mayumi Ouchi (R1 ladies)
James Beeton v Bradley Kirk (R1 men)
Paula Murphy v Paula Jacklin (R1 ladies)
Edwin Torbjornsson v Shane McGuirk (R2 men)
Evening session (from 7 p.m.)
Aaron Turner v Jeff Springer Jr (R1 men)
Lisa Ashton v Sophie McKinlay (R1 ladies)
Cliff Porter v Scott Walters (R2 men)
Nicole Regnaud v Wendy Harper (R2 ladies)
Mike Gillet v Ky Smith (R1 men)
Two seeds fell on an entertaining night of action at the Lakeside!
— WDF Darts (@DartsWDF) November 30, 2024
Full recap of tonight's winners and losers 👇 pic.twitter.com/39EdQHF7ob

Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026




