BACK IN THE DAY WITH: Phill Nixon - The stay-at-home dad who nearly became world champion with an unlikely comeback against Martin Adams
BDO
In this column, we regularly take a trip back in time with a particular darts player. Today, we do so with Englishman Phill Nixon, who came close to producing a huge shock by winning the World Championship on his debut.
ADVERTISEMENT
World Championship debut at the age of 50
Phill Nixon was born on March 13, 1956, in Durham. For many years, he was a very solid player in local leagues in England, but he rarely competed on the international stage. His best results for a long time were a quarter-final at the 2002 Winmau World Masters and a semi-final at the 2004 British Open.
That changed when he managed to qualify for the 2007 BDO World Championship. However, Nixon’s route through qualification was far from easy. He had to battle through regional and national qualifying tournaments to earn a place in the international qualifier for the World Championship. There, Nixon fulfilled his dream and made his World Championship debut at the age of 50.
Despite that achievement, bookmakers gave him virtually no chance, pricing him at 150/1 to become world champion—joint lowest odds of all participants that year, alongside Dutchman Albertino Essers.
Giant-killing run
It didn’t bother Nixon, nicknamed ‘Nixy’ and ‘The Ferryhill Flyer’. In the opening round, he immediately caused a major upset by defeating seventh seed Darryl Fitton 3–1. Nixon averaged 92.43 in that match, placing him among the top 10 highest averages of the tournament. One round later, tenth seed Martin Atkins was also dispatched 4–1.
In the quarter-finals, Nixon briefly stood on the brink of elimination, but ultimately edged past Scotland’s Paul Hanvidge 5–4. So, on his World Championship debut, Nixon marched straight into the semi-finals. There, he faced another surprise package, Dutchman Niels de Ruiter. The pair produced an exciting contest, but Nixon prevailed 6–4 to set up a final against top seed Martin Adams, who—like Nixon—was chasing his first world title.
ADVERTISEMENT
Legendary final
The final began disastrously for Nixon. He failed to win any of the first six sets and went into the break trailing 6–0, with barely any hope left of becoming world champion.
Most thought the excitement was over—but nothing could have been further from the truth.
Adams missed four match darts in the following sets, and Nixon capitalised, clawing back to 6–1, 6–2… and eventually 6–6. A frenzied Lakeside crowd erupted.
In the deciding set, Adams ultimately proved just too strong. Nevertheless, Nixon still took home a tidy £30,000 for his runner-up finish.
ADVERTISEMENT
Grand Slam appearances
Thanks to his strong World Championship performances, Nixon qualified for the Grand Slam of Darts in 2007 and 2008, where top players from both the BDO and PDC competed.
In 2007, he lost 5–4 in the group stage to James Wade and Pat Orreal. His only win came against De Ruiter—a repeat of their World Championship semi-final—where he triumphed 5–0. It wasn’t enough to reach the knockout stage.
In 2008, he again exited in the group phase. After a 5–0 loss to Phil Taylor, he was beaten 5–1 by Vincent van der Voort. His only victory came against Andy Jenkins (5–3).
ADVERTISEMENT
World Championship rematch
A year after reaching the final, Nixon returned to the BDO World Championship in 2008. As fate would have it, he was drawn against Martin Adams once again.
In a rematch of the previous year’s final, Nixon lost 3–0. He never found his rhythm and posted an average of just 77.61—well below his usual standard.
It proved to be his final World Championship appearance. In the years that followed, he faded from the spotlight, aside from a quarter-final at the 2012 Winmau World Masters.
Career overview
ADVERTISEMENT
| Organisatie | Tournament | Best result | Year |
| WDF | World Championship | Finale | 2007 |
| WDF | World Masters | Kwartfinale | 2002, 2012 |
| WDF | World Trophy | Laatste 56 | 2007 |
| WDF | International Darts League | Voorronde | 2007 |
| WDF | Finder Masters | Groepsfase | 2007 |
| PDC | Grand Slam | Groepsfase | 2007, 2008 |
Looking back: the househusband who nearly became world champion
Nearly twenty years on from his remarkable run, it would have been fascinating to look back on Nixon’s career with him—but sadly, that’s no longer possible.
In June 2013, Nixon was diagnosed with stomach, liver, and lung cancer. He passed away on August 9 of that same year at the age of 57.
He left behind his wife Suzanne and eight children. What makes his story so remarkable is that at the time of his World Championship debut, Nixon was a househusband who played darts purely as a hobby. Only after reaching the final did he decide to take the sport more seriously—but that opportunity was cut short.
ADVERTISEMENT
Martin Adams said after Nixon’s passing: “I’d known him a lot of years before he came to prominence at the Lakeside in 2007. He was a great darts player, a great competitor and a very nice man with it. Sadly we’ve lost a very good man all-round in our sport, who was respected and liked by everybody.”
Phill Nixon in action
The BDO also paid tribute: “Phill was always proud to pull on the England shirt and England were always pleased to have him in the team. Phill played seven times for England in full internationals, winning on five occasions, he also played three times in representative matches for England.
“Phill Nixon was one of the great characters in the game and will be sadly missed by everyone who had the pleasure of meeting him.”
And Bobby George added: “So saddened to hear the news of Phill Nixon losing his fight against cancer. A lovely fun guy who will never be forgotten.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Nixon’s place in darts history
With only two World Championship appearances, you might not immediately place Nixon high on the all-time list. Yet his story continues to inspire even the current generation. A man who spent years competing at regional and national level, only to make his World Championship debut at 50.
But above all, it is that extraordinary 2007 final that will be remembered time and time again. Nixon was not the first debutant to reach a World Championship final—and he didn’t win it. But coming back from 6–0 down to level at 6–6 had never been seen before in a World Championship final.
The atmosphere inside the Lakeside Country Club that night is hard to put into words. With his performance, Nixon proved one thing above all: you should never give up on your dream. While many sports impose an age limit on peak performance, darts remains a game where glory can still be achieved later in life.
ADVERTISEMENT
Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 24visitors 5
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026