
The Grand Slam of Darts has reached its conclusion. After 60 matches and 577 legs of darts - plus a nine-dart shootout - there remain just four of the original 32 competitors. And what a foursome they are. The first, second, third and fifth seeds all clash with glory, the trophy and a £110,000 prize up for grabs. When that fifth seed is the greatest player of all time, the standard of quality on show speaks for itself.
First up is a battle between Scotland internationals, as Peter Wright takes on Gary Anderson. After that comes the collision of the unstoppable force of Michael van Gerwen, and the immovable object that is Phil Taylor. The semi-finals begin at 1pm GMT in Wolverhampton. Then, from 7pm GMT, comes the final. Which pair will take to the Wolves Civic stage with the chance to win the 11th edition of the Grand Slam of Darts?
First up is a battle between Scotland internationals, as Peter Wright takes on Gary Anderson. After that comes the collision of the unstoppable force of Michael van Gerwen, and the immovable object that is Phil Taylor. The semi-finals begin at 1pm GMT in Wolverhampton. Then, from 7pm GMT, comes the final. Which pair will take to the Wolves Civic stage with the chance to win the 11th edition of the Grand Slam of Darts?
ADVERTISEMENT
Semi-final 1: Peter Wright vs Gary Anderson
Ask Gary Anderson, and he may say that his toughest pre-final test has already come and gone. Beating Mensur Suljovic on TV for the first time ever saw 'The Flying Scotsman' progress into a semi-final meeting with Peter Wright. Anderson has the right to be a lot more confident of a man he usually beats. Of the seven meetings between the pair this year, Anderson has won six. Wright needed a 109 average to see off Anderson in his one victory, in the Premier League. Eight weeks later, Anderson returned the favour with a 113 average in the same competition.
What both have shown is that they can rise to a challenge. Anderson roared back after Michael Smith took a surprise 4-1 lead in his first knockout game, going on to average 106.91. Wright also topped a ton average in his win over Stephen Bunting. 'Snakebite' saw his scoring plummet in a quarter-final where Glen Durrant never really threatened him, while Anderson was able to coast in the end against Suljovic.
Anderson has power scoring on his side, while Wright is a consistent finisher. It may be doubles that decide this one, and both will have to improve on their quarter-final showings. Wright had a 38% success rate when finishing, and Anderson could only go 1% better. The favourite is undoubtedly Anderson, the more accomplished of the pair with a much better record of keeping his cool at the latter stages of tournaments. Yet Wright isn't the world number two for nothing. The excellent temperament of the pair means neither will give up, and that should make this a battle, right down to the final dart thrown.
What both have shown is that they can rise to a challenge. Anderson roared back after Michael Smith took a surprise 4-1 lead in his first knockout game, going on to average 106.91. Wright also topped a ton average in his win over Stephen Bunting. 'Snakebite' saw his scoring plummet in a quarter-final where Glen Durrant never really threatened him, while Anderson was able to coast in the end against Suljovic.
Anderson has power scoring on his side, while Wright is a consistent finisher. It may be doubles that decide this one, and both will have to improve on their quarter-final showings. Wright had a 38% success rate when finishing, and Anderson could only go 1% better. The favourite is undoubtedly Anderson, the more accomplished of the pair with a much better record of keeping his cool at the latter stages of tournaments. Yet Wright isn't the world number two for nothing. The excellent temperament of the pair means neither will give up, and that should make this a battle, right down to the final dart thrown.
Semi-final 2: Michael van Gerwen vs Phil Taylor
Only two players in history have won multiple Grand Slams. Both of those champions meet in the second semi-final. Michael van Gerwen followed up a 104.98 against Steve Lennon with an unerringly similar 104.26 against Rob Cross in the quarter-finals. Phil Taylor averaged 103.97 against Daryl Gurney yesterday, in a slight improvement on his 101.04 versus James Wade in the first knockout round. This is a tie that could truly go either way.
The pair were in formidable form in their quarter-final ties against promising young stars. Both notched up four ton-plus checkouts at vital times, on top of the aforementioned averages. Taylor had a 67% success rate on his doubles (83% if you exclude one protracted end to a leg). Van Gerwen hit a hot streak at the end against Cross, in a match in which the Dutchman fired in 11 180s.
Nobody is more pleased at this match-up than Taylor - though the millions of darts fans around the world are certainly relishing it. The 16-time world champion has spoken of a desire to give van Gerwen "a caning", and can't guarantee he'll have a chance at the Ally Pally. In fact, this could be the final major meeting between the tungsten titans. Taylor will be fired up by this one.
Van Gerwen will not have been paying attention to Taylor's varied and bizarre outbursts this week. The Stoke thrower has got the better of him on the big stage recently, notably in the World Matchplay, and 'Mighty Mike' is running out of chances to assert his dominance. Being the only player of the semi-finalists to average 100+ in all five of his games so far, van Gerwen brings a formidable consistency to the table. Both have an agenda, a point to prove, and a strong desire to win. Given their fine form, this could be one incredible tussle.
It remains to be seen who will take part in the final. Whoever does, they will surely serve up a match worthy of wrapping up what has been a fantastic Grand Slam of Darts.
Predictions
Semi-finals
Gary Anderson 16-11 Peter Wright
Michael van Gerwen 16-14 Phil Taylor
Final
Gary Anderson 16-13 Michael van Gerwen
This is dependent on so many factors - not least the two actually making the final. But Anderson will punish any mistakes van Gerwen makes. When under pressure, he rises to the challenge. That was proved against Michael Smith, when all of his legs were won in 15 darts or fewer. Revenge for the recent World Series of Darts defeat may be on the cards. But it truly could go any of four ways.
The pair were in formidable form in their quarter-final ties against promising young stars. Both notched up four ton-plus checkouts at vital times, on top of the aforementioned averages. Taylor had a 67% success rate on his doubles (83% if you exclude one protracted end to a leg). Van Gerwen hit a hot streak at the end against Cross, in a match in which the Dutchman fired in 11 180s.
Nobody is more pleased at this match-up than Taylor - though the millions of darts fans around the world are certainly relishing it. The 16-time world champion has spoken of a desire to give van Gerwen "a caning", and can't guarantee he'll have a chance at the Ally Pally. In fact, this could be the final major meeting between the tungsten titans. Taylor will be fired up by this one.
Van Gerwen will not have been paying attention to Taylor's varied and bizarre outbursts this week. The Stoke thrower has got the better of him on the big stage recently, notably in the World Matchplay, and 'Mighty Mike' is running out of chances to assert his dominance. Being the only player of the semi-finalists to average 100+ in all five of his games so far, van Gerwen brings a formidable consistency to the table. Both have an agenda, a point to prove, and a strong desire to win. Given their fine form, this could be one incredible tussle.
It remains to be seen who will take part in the final. Whoever does, they will surely serve up a match worthy of wrapping up what has been a fantastic Grand Slam of Darts.
Predictions
Semi-finals
Gary Anderson 16-11 Peter Wright
Michael van Gerwen 16-14 Phil Taylor
Final
Gary Anderson 16-13 Michael van Gerwen
This is dependent on so many factors - not least the two actually making the final. But Anderson will punish any mistakes van Gerwen makes. When under pressure, he rises to the challenge. That was proved against Michael Smith, when all of his legs were won in 15 darts or fewer. Revenge for the recent World Series of Darts defeat may be on the cards. But it truly could go any of four ways.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026





