Gerwyn Price and James Wade shared the spoils in the opening match of the Premier League in Dublin in a game between two players who have not been crowd favourites as of late.
ADVERTISEMENT
Price though had to recover from 5-2 down in order to pinch a point against Wade who himself averaged 103. The Welshman pinched the opening leg on double four but in typical Wade fashion, the Aldershot ace tied it up with a 127 checkout.
It went to 2-2 with both players breaking each other but still getting back on terms. From there though, Wade ran away with it winning the next three legs to go 5-2 up and seemingly on his way to the win.
Despite that, Price hung on with a bullseye finish for 88 the real catalyst for him to then go 6-5 in front. In the last leg though, it was time for Wade to get his own back of sorts and he pinched a point.
Click here for more information about the Premier League Darts, including all the fixtures and the prize fund breakdown.
Night Three – Thursday February 21
3Arena, Dublin
Gerwyn Price (96.22) 6 (12) 6 (103.89) James Wade
Steve Lennon v Peter Wright
Michael van Gerwen v Rob Cross
Michael Smith v Daryl Gurney
Mensur Suljovic v Raymond van Barneveld
https://twitter.com/OfficialPDC/status/1098668818467962880
It went to 2-2 with both players breaking each other but still getting back on terms. From there though, Wade ran away with it winning the next three legs to go 5-2 up and seemingly on his way to the win.
Despite that, Price hung on with a bullseye finish for 88 the real catalyst for him to then go 6-5 in front. In the last leg though, it was time for Wade to get his own back of sorts and he pinched a point.
Click here for more information about the Premier League Darts, including all the fixtures and the prize fund breakdown.
Night Three – Thursday February 21
3Arena, Dublin
Gerwyn Price (96.22) 6 (12) 6 (103.89) James Wade
Steve Lennon v Peter Wright
Michael van Gerwen v Rob Cross
Michael Smith v Daryl Gurney
Mensur Suljovic v Raymond van Barneveld
https://twitter.com/OfficialPDC/status/1098668818467962880
Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- The players who deliberately slow the game down are usually boring and win very little in the way of silverware. Horrible to watch.MrYnyslas197112-10-2026
- [“The Gentle” then used a sweeping and questionable phrase...] You anglocucks are hilariously finished in every sense of the word.Critical99911-10-2026
- I love Jonny but I disagree. The Grand Slam was always supposed to be "champion of champions" type competition. If the top 16 are guaranteed participation in everything there will be so much less jeopardy involved in qualifying and each major tournament will lose its unique flavour which the PDC has worked hard trying to develop. I enjoy following the qualification races towards the end of the year, and while consistency should have its rewards, the truth is Jonny hasn't reached a major final all year or won a single event on the Pro Tour. Being consistent is one thing, but that alone should have consequences as the sport's elite should not be prepared to accept consistently strong performances, their foremost motivation should be to win and this should be what separates them from the rest, not the consistency of their performances. Jonny is expecting that losing should be enough; it shouldn't be, at least not as far as the Grand Slam is concerned.Deduce635811-10-2026
- Well being honest,it doesn't matter what level you play at, there's always someone who slows it down to suit themselves,and extra swig of water, replacing flights, asking the ref what the score is. It happens wherever. I'm not saying it's professional,but I'm sure we've all seen it beforerick6711-10-2026
- Agree completely. Not sure how a ranking event can have a criteria not based on rankings. And he right on popularity. In the UK second only to football.BandB11-10-2026
- Doesn't matter who's in it,it's boringrick6710-10-2026
- Assuming you qualify as one of the "muppets" in question. Classist too. And since you're so clearly interested in academia, look up "linguistic descriptivism" while you're at it. Oh, and better stay away from the working class sport of darts and maybe offer your insightful analysis to, let's say, croquet instead?Deduce635806-10-2026
- The consequences of being uneducated and grammatically challenged. "To all THOSE muppets not THEM " Everytime I see Arsepinall, I have an image of him wearing a cap, standing behind the counter of a fast food establishment.richieburnettrocks05-10-2026
- I don't understand Littler's reason for playing this tournament.rick6705-10-2026
- James Wade has become James Wide. He has piled on the tonnage considerably, he barely fits in his shirt.richieburnettrocks03-10-2026
Loading