“100,000 percent a 147” – Luca Brecel believes a nine-darter is easier than a maximum break in snooker
PDC
At first glance, snooker and darts seem like two completely different worlds. Where snooker revolves around finesse on a large table with complex patterns, darts appears to be a straightforward precision sport on a board. Yet the similarities are greater than many think. Both disciplines demand extreme accuracy, nerves of steel, and sharp strategic insight. But the ultimate question remains: what is actually harder – a maximum 147 break in snooker or a nine-darter in darts?
ADVERTISEMENT
Former snooker world champion
That question was recently put to Belgian snooker player Luca Brecel, who, alongside his snooker career, is also a big darts enthusiast. His answer was strikingly emphatic: “100,000 percent a 147.” With that, he takes a clear position in a debate that has been running among sports fans for years.
Brecel, snooker world champion in 2023, stated in an interview with Sportnieuws.nl that his passion for darts runs deep. “Even bigger than snooker. I watch everything and I also play almost daily myself. So yes: a big passion,” he said. That makes his opinion all the more interesting, because he doesn’t speak as an outsider. On the contrary, he knows exactly what it takes to perform at a high level in both sports.
Read also
To properly understand the comparison, it’s important to examine both achievements. A 147 in snooker – the maximum break – means a player pots all fifteen reds, each followed by the black, and then all the colours in the correct order. In total, it involves 36 perfect shots in a row, where not only potting matters, but cue ball positioning is crucial. One small positional error can derail the entire attempt. The fastest maximum break ever in competition was made by Ronnie O'Sullivan, who in 1997 took exactly 5 minutes and 8 seconds to clear the table.
Opposite that stands the nine-darter in darts: the perfect leg in which a player checks out 501 in just nine darts. This requires consistently hitting trebles, usually treble 20, and a flawless checkout. It’s an explosive achievement where everything must come together perfectly in a short burst.
Brecel, who also regularly throws a few darts himself, has a clear view on it. “With the first nine darts my average is around 70 to 75, which is quite good for an amateur,” he says. Yet he realises better than anyone how big the step to absolute perfection is. “In darts you can be done in nine darts, but in snooker you have to stay error-free for much longer. That makes it mentally tougher.”
ADVERTISEMENT

Michael van Gerwen has thrown multiple nine-darters at major tournaments
A key difference indeed lies in the duration and complexity of the feat. Where a darter needs nine perfect throws, a snooker player must execute a long sequence of decisions and technical actions without error. The variability of the table also plays a role: no situation is the same, making improvisation and forward thinking essential.
“The pressure on stage is enormous”
That said, a nine-darter is certainly not ‘easy’. On the contrary. At the highest level, under the pressure of a packed arena and millions of viewers, hitting multiple trebles in succession is a world-class performance. “The pressure on stage is enormous,” said Brecel. “But in snooker you have to withstand that pressure for much longer.”
Interestingly, nine-darters have become more common in recent years than maximum breaks in snooker. That’s partly due to the growth and professionalisation of darts, which has massively raised the overall standard. More players are posting higher averages, increasing the chance of a perfect leg.
ADVERTISEMENT
Even so, the 147 break remains for many the ultimate test of complete mastery. It’s not only a matter of technique, but also of patience, planning, and mental resilience. Every ball is a new challenge, every position a new puzzle.
The conclusion? While both achievements are exceptional and represent the absolute elite level, the 147 break seems to demand just that bit more. More steps, more variables, and a longer stretch of perfection make it, according to experts – and according to Brecel – the tougher task.
But perhaps that’s exactly what makes this debate so compelling. Because whether you favour the elegance of snooker or the intensity of darts, one thing is certain: perfection is rare in both sports – and all the more impressive because of it.

Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026








