“99% of players who beat Phil Taylor lost the next game – I wanted to prove them wrong” - Gian van Veen averts Humphries hangover to reach World Matchplay quarters
PDC
Gian van Veen is through to the quarter-finals for the first time at the World Matchplay. Speaking to Dartsnews.com afterwards, he admitted he was “wary” of a post-upset hangover after beating world number one Luke Humphries – and drew on darting history as motivation before producing another big-stage victory at the Winter Gardens.
ADVERTISEMENT
“Back in the day, even players who beat Phil Taylor – 99% of them lost the next game,” Van Veen said in his post-match press conference. “So I was trying to prove that wrong and continue in this tournament.”
The rising Dutch star did just that, overcoming his World Cup partner and close friend Danny Noppert 11-5 in the second round of the World Matchplay to reach his fourth televised ranking quarter-final. Van Veen landed three ton-plus checkouts – including finishes of 150 and 120 – during a clinical display that saw him win seven of the last eight legs, backing up the biggest win of his career with a steely and composed follow-up.
Read also
“Today was a very different, strange game for myself,” he said. “I didn’t feel like I played anywhere near as well as I did on Saturday. I struggled really badly with scoring, but some good finishes got me into the game – that’s what took me over the line.”
“Even I thought to myself it was a bad game – but averaging 94 or 95 is obviously not a bad game. To win these kinds of games is a massive confidence boost going into the rest of the tournament – even when you’re not playing at your best.”
While others may have folded after a career-high scalp, Van Veen was determined to prove he belonged in the latter stages of a major. His emotional high from beating Humphries was followed by media attention and fan buzz – and then a meeting with a player he calls one of his best mates.

ADVERTISEMENT
“There was some extra pressure after beating Luke,” he admitted. “I think I handled it really well today – especially finishing-wise. I took my chances when Danny didn’t, and that’s what got me the win.”
Van Veen’s rise has been rapid. Still only 23, he played his first Matchplay game just last year – and now finds himself two wins from a place in the final. “I think if you’d have said that to me before the tournament, I’d have shaken your hand straight away,” he said. “Especially with the draw I had – playing Luke in the first game.”
Read also
Van Veen said he felt “at home on the stage” in Blackpool and welcomed the return to a long-format match in the quarter-finals, having previously gone toe-to-toe with Gary Anderson in a best-of-31 Grand Slam epic. “I’ve only played one game in that format before – but I think it really suits my game. Even today, I didn’t start off well, but I had a couple of legs to settle into it. Some good finishing really helped me. I can’t wait to play that format again.”
Off the board, the Dutchman is adjusting to life as a full-time professional – having recently left work and completed his studies. “When I got my Tour Card, I was still in education,” he said. “I finished it, got my degree, and started working 24 hours a week. But I quit after six months – it got too busy with all the tournaments. It’s been really hectic, but life’s good. I recently bought a house with my girlfriend, so I can’t complain.”
ADVERTISEMENT
This week in Blackpool has brought more than just success – it’s also brought exposure. Van Veen was part of the PDC’s Bullseye Maths initiative and spent time playing with local schoolchildren. “I really enjoyed a couple of hours with the kids,” he said. “The sport here in the UK is in really good hands. Hopefully me – and the other PDC players involved – can inspire them and show them how fun darts is. It helps with maths, too – it did for me!”
As for what lies ahead, Van Veen is refusing to get carried away, even as he allows himself to dream. “I think I was close to something special today – missed the nine-darter on the eighth dart – but I’m taking it game by game,” he said. “That’s what I told myself from the start. Hopefully we can win three more – but so far, it’s been a really successful Matchplay.”
With Wessel Nijman also flying the flag for the future of Dutch darts this week, questions about the next generation of Van Gerwen and Barneveld are already surfacing – but Van Veen is keeping perspective. “Hopefully! If I’m one of them, that’s the goal,” he said. “Darts is growing so quickly. You’ve seen players like Luke Littler, Wessel, and myself come through. In ten years’ time, there could be five Dutch players we don’t even know about yet. But for now, I’m really enjoying the ride I’m on.”
Read also
ADVERTISEMENT

Kieran WoodDarts Journalist
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He contributes to DartsNews.com, where he covers professional darts through news, match reports, analysis, and live coverage across the PDC calendar and major tournaments.
A key part of his work is on-site reporting from leading events. Kieran has covered the PDC World Darts Championship in person, reporting daily from the venue and providing first-hand insight from the tournament. During his coverage, he has conducted interviews with leading players including Luke Littler, Luke Humphries, and Gerwyn Price.
He is also one of the leading voices of the English-language Dartsnews Podcast, contributing regular analysis and discussion on developments across the professional darts circuit.
In his reporting, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026
- Not even slightly interestedrick6730-10-2026
- And yet the PDC has decided to aggravate this problem by doubling the Players Championship Finals field from 2027. I can't imagine there will be fewer withdrawals next year with even less reason to turn up. I can only hope that a whole slew of Challenge Tour top-up players receive enough prize money in the absence of much of the elite, that some of the more complacent among them struggle to scrape into even a heavily diluted field! More semi-pro players will get to test their mettle, but the standard of competition will be much inferior. It could hardly be said that the Players Championship series will provide an opportunity for darts' second string to test their Tour Card credentials anymore, but at least it will underscore the achievements of those Challenge Tour players of current and previous years, who were able to prove themselves as more than capable of competing with, and beating, the elite of the sport on a consistent basis, and reaping the due rewards.Deduce635828-10-2026
- No point in being there? Champions want to win.Deduce635828-10-2026








