“Almost every day he gives you a reason to think, 'I hate you'” – Frank Evenblij on his admiration and love for Raymond van Barneveld
PDC
Frank Evenblij has a mission. What started as a joke has become a serious ambition: bringing darts to the Olympic Games. “It’s the ultimate dream,” he says. “It’s become a mission for me: making darts an Olympic sport. And on some level, of course, it’s a big joke. But on the other hand, why wouldn't you do it?"
ADVERTISEMENT
Evenblij has been an outspoken fan of the sport for years. Not just as a viewer, but also as an advocate. darts is one of my favourite sports to watch. It’s one of the best spectator sports there is, aside from all the other sports I enjoy. So why wouldn’t you make it Olympic?"
His plea is driven not only by love for the game, but also by a practical thought. "The joke used to be — especially at Lakeside — that those guys would sweat liters just throwing a few darts. It was always incredibly hot there." With a wink, he adds: “When I was younger, I thought: that’s why it should go to the Winter Olympics. Then you could play it in the snow and wouldn’t have to worry about sweating."
The joke is obvious, but his reasoning does have some merit. The Winter Games are known for their openness to new disciplines. “The Olympic Games, especially the Winter Games, are always looking for new sports. New disciplines are added regularly. You see it with snowboard and all the different variations — often judged events. And in some ways, darts resembles archery. So why not?”
According to Evenblij, it’s also a major global sport. “It’s a huge global sport. It’s also a sport that’s most popular in the winter — it fits perfectly with Christmas. My entire holiday period revolves around watching the PDC World Championship."
Read also
Love for Van Barneveld: “Being a fan is a combat sport”
That Evenblij has given his heart to darts is also evident from his unconditional support for Raymond van Barneveld. The Hague native makes no secret of his admiration for ‘Barney’, although that love comes with its share of suffering.
ADVERTISEMENT
“I grew up in The Hague, and I’m a die-hard Raymond van Barneveld fan,” he says. “And I can tell you — and you know this too — it’s very hard to be a Raymond van Barneveld fan. Because almost every day he gives you a reason to think, 'I hate you.' It’s tough. It’s real suffering. Being a Raymond van Barneveld fan is a combat sport.”

Van Barneveld put Dutch darts on the map in the late 90s.
The fact that Rafael van der Vaart has recently taken Van Barneveld under his wing catches Evenblij’s interest. Although he admits he didn’t immediately see the pairing, he can appreciate it.
“I actually can’t picture it at all, but I think it’s great that Van der Vaart is looking out for him. He talks about bringing in sponsors — 'I’ve got some rich friends in Beverwijk' — I love that."
At the same time, Evenblij understands that Van Barneveld could benefit from clear guidance. “Van Barneveld is basically like a little boy. You sometimes have to take him by the hand and say: you need to get up at two o’clock, here’s your breakfast, this is when your flight leaves, and today you’re only using these darts.”
ADVERTISEMENT
He laughs at his own words, but he means them. “It sounds childish — the man is almost sixty — but if that’s what he needs, then I think that’s very cool.”
Read also
Evenblij even offers himself as a mental pillar of support. “And by the way, Rafael van der Vaart: if you ever need me to mentally support Raymond van Barneveld from time to time, I’m your guy.”
What began as a light-hearted remark about sweaty darters in a warm Lakeside hall has grown into a serious plea. Evenblij knows the idea of Olympic darts makes some people smile, but he points to the sport’s growth, international reach, and appeal. “It’s such a major global sport. I would really love it if it ever achieved that status.”

Lucas MichaelDarts Journalist
Lucas Michael is a darts journalist and reporter based in Cambridge, UK, and has been part of the DartsNews team since 2025. He covers professional darts through reports, analysis, round-ups, and live coverage, with a focus on clear context and accurate reporting across the PDC calendar.
A key part of his work is liveblogging major tournaments throughout the year, providing real-time updates, match coverage, and contextual reporting across the professional circuit. He also reports regularly from events on site and has covered the PDC World Darts Championship from the venue, delivering first-hand insight throughout the tournament.
Within the newsroom, Lucas works closely with the editorial team and supports coverage alongside Chief Content Officer Samuel Gill and reporter Kieran Wood.
Lucas holds a BA (Hons) in Sports Journalism. In his work, he places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating content promptly when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026
- Not even slightly interestedrick6730-10-2026
- And yet the PDC has decided to aggravate this problem by doubling the Players Championship Finals field from 2027. I can't imagine there will be fewer withdrawals next year with even less reason to turn up. I can only hope that a whole slew of Challenge Tour top-up players receive enough prize money in the absence of much of the elite, that some of the more complacent among them struggle to scrape into even a heavily diluted field! More semi-pro players will get to test their mettle, but the standard of competition will be much inferior. It could hardly be said that the Players Championship series will provide an opportunity for darts' second string to test their Tour Card credentials anymore, but at least it will underscore the achievements of those Challenge Tour players of current and previous years, who were able to prove themselves as more than capable of competing with, and beating, the elite of the sport on a consistent basis, and reaping the due rewards.Deduce635828-10-2026
- No point in being there? Champions want to win.Deduce635828-10-2026







