In this feature, we regularly look back in the day with a particular darts player. Today, we are doing so with Kevin Painter. He grew into one of the most recognisable players in the history of professional darts. Nicknamed ‘The Artist', he won just one PDC major during his career, but his name is forever etched into darts history. Above all, his legendary World Championship final against Phil Taylor in 2004 made Painter immortal. It was a match that grew into one of the most memorable contests ever played on television.
ADVERTISEMENT
Kevin Painter was born on July 12, 1967, and started playing darts around the age of 17. He spent his early years within the BDO, gradually working his way up. In 1994, he made his World Championship debut. There, he lost 3-2 to Kevin Kenny in the first round.
A year later, Painter managed to go one round further, but Martin Adams proved too strong, winning 3-0. Nevertheless, 1995 was an important year. He won the inaugural edition of the England Open, showing that he had the level required to play an important role in international darts.
First successes and move to the PDC
In 1997, another milestone followed when Painter won the prestigious British Open. He was also progressing further at the BDO World Championship. In 2000, he reached the quarter-finals of the World Championship for the first time. There, he lost 5-2 to Ted Hankey, who would eventually go on to win the world title.
Around the turn of the millennium, Painter began pushing his limits more and more. He won the Swedish Open and, in the meantime, also took his first steps on the PDC circuit. At the 2000 World Grand Prix, he immediately reached the second round. There, Phil Taylor was waiting for him, with Taylor eventually winning 3-2.
Painter's definitive move to the PDC came in 2001. And it was there that the story of Painter and Taylor began to enter a particularly interesting chapter. During the 2001 World Grand Prix, Painter pulled off a huge upset. In the first round, he eliminated Taylor. This was remarkable for several reasons. Taylor had never previously lost at the World Grand Prix and had also not lost a televised match for two years. Painter therefore became the first player to defeat Taylor in the first round of a televised tournament.
Although Painter eventually went out in the quarter-finals against Dennis Smith, he had certainly made his mark.
ADVERTISEMENT
The final that will never be forgotten
Painter made an excellent start to his PDC career. In 2003, he reached the semi-finals of the PDC World Championship, where John Part proved too strong, winning 6-4. A year later, however, Painter would experience the biggest moment of his career.
As the number ten seed, he began the 2004 World Championship. He defeated Paul Williams, beat Ronnie Baxter, eliminated Mark Dudbridge and then made short work of former world champion Bob Anderson.
In the final, Phil Taylor stood in his way once again. What followed became a classic. Painter even took a 4-1 lead in sets and appeared to be heading towards one of the biggest upsets in the history of the PDC World Championship. Taylor fought his way back. The match eventually finished 6-6 in sets and 5-5 in legs in the deciding set. A sudden-death leg was required to determine the world champion. Painter had his chances. He had opportunities to finish the match earlier, but Taylor remained standing. In the decisive leg, ‘The Power’ eventually prevailed.
Taylor was world champion, while Painter was the tragic loser. Yet it was precisely that defeat that made him world famous. The final was watched by around 820,000 television viewers at the time and is still regarded as one of the greatest matches in darts history.
ADVERTISEMENT
Rivalry with Taylor
The relationship between Painter and Taylor would never again be completely relaxed. The rivalry between the two Englishmen grew into one of the best-known feuds in darts.
A year after the World Championship final, they faced each other again in the quarter-finals of the World Championship. The painter regularly tried to use the bullseye for his finishes but failed to hit it several times.
Taylor eventually won the final leg by deliberately leaving 50 and then hitting the bullseye. Painter saw this as a provocation. A heated argument between the two players followed.
ADVERTISEMENT
Things went wrong again in 2008. During the Holland Masters, Painter clashed with Adrian Lewis, who was Taylor's protégé at the time. The argument escalated to such an extent that both players were removed from the tournament.
Painter was eventually fined £200 and suspended for three months, with two months suspended. Lewis received a higher fine and a longer suspension.
An impressive comeback
After his 2004 World Championship final, Painter experienced mixed years. His ranking dropped and, in 2007, he appeared to be gradually disappearing from the spotlight. Sky Sports analyst and friend Rod Harrington even warned that Painter risked disappearing into obscurity.
That, however, proved to be a wrong assessment. Painter bounced back and made a strong impression at the inaugural Grand Slam of Darts in 2007. As a wildcard, he reached the quarter-finals.
ADVERTISEMENT
A year later, another impressive World Championship followed. Painter defeated Raymond van Barneveld in the last 16. According to Painter himself, it was the biggest victory of his career. He lost to John Part again in the semi-finals, but his reputation as a dangerous player on the big stage had been definitively restored.
In 2009 and 2010, Painter also continued to make deep runs regularly. Among other achievements, he reached the semi-finals of the UK Open in 2009 and reached the quarter-finals of both the World Grand Prix and Grand Slam of Darts.
During the 2010 World Matchplay, he wrote another remarkable chapter. Against Colin Lloyd, he was 8-2 down, but Painter fought back to win 11-9. He then defeated Mark Walsh 14-12 and finally reached the quarter-finals of the prestigious tournament.
Kevin Painter was a fixture near the top for many years.
Finally a major
ADVERTISEMENT
The major prize Painter had been waiting for for years finally arrived in December 2011. At the Players Championship Finals, the 44-year-old Englishman was in excellent form. He defeated Colin Osborne, Gary Anderson, Mervyn King and Scott Rand to reach the final.

Kevin Painter with his trophy from the Players Championship Finals
Against Rand, Painter had also fought back spectacularly. He was 9-6 behind and survived two match darts. In the final, Mark Webster awaited. Painter did not let the opportunity slip away. With a 13-9 victory, he finally won his first and ultimately only PDC major.
It was a special moment for a player who had been known for years as the man who narrowly missed out on the biggest prizes. His victory also returned him to the world's top ten.
The success earned him a wildcard for the 2012 Premier League. There, he defeated Gary Anderson, Simon Whitlock, Andy Hamilton and Adrian Lewis, among others. Nevertheless, Painter ultimately finished seventh in the eight-player competition.
ADVERTISEMENT
The end of a long career at the top
After his major victory, Painter remained active at the highest level for many years, but his best years were now behind him. He continued to compete in major tournaments regularly and faced Phil Taylor at the World Championship in 2016. In 2017, he met Taylor again at the World Championship.
In 2018, Painter was no longer able to qualify for other majors. A year later, he lost his PDC Tour Card and continued his career on the Challenge Tour. After Q-School in 2021, Painter decided to definitively bring his professional career to an end. After a career of around 25 years, ‘The Artist’ announced his retirement.
Kevin 'The Artist' Painter in action
Kevin Painter's World Championship results
ADVERTISEMENT
| Year | Organisation | Round | Opponent | Result |
| 1994 | BDO | First round | Kevin Kenny | 2–3 |
| 1995 | BDO | Second round | Martin Adams | 0–3 |
| 1996 | BDO | First round | Ronnie Baxter | 2–3 |
| 1998 | BDO | Second round | Richie Burnett | 1–3 |
| 1999 | BDO | Second round | Ronnie Baxter | 0–3 |
| 2000 | BDO | Quarter-finals | Ted Hankey | 2–5 |
| 2001 | BDO | Quarter-finals | Andy Fordham | 2–5 |
| 2002 | PDC | First round | Ronnie Baxter | 2–4 |
| 2003 | PDC | Semi-finals | John Part | 4–6 |
| 2004 | PDC | Final | Phil Taylor | 6–7 |
| 2005 | PDC | Quarter-finals | Phil Taylor | 1–5 |
| 2006 | PDC | Quarter-finals | Phil Taylor | 1–5 |
| 2007 | PDC | First round | Colin Osborne | 1–3 |
| 2008 | PDC | Semi-finals | John Part | 2–6 |
| 2009 | PDC | Third round | Phil Taylor | 1–4 |
| 2010 | PDC | Third round | Raymond van Barneveld | 1–4 |
| 2011 | PDC | First round | Brendan Dolan | 0–3 |
| 2012 | PDC | Third round | John Part | 2–4 |
| 2013 | PDC | Third round | Adrian Lewis | 2–4 |
| 2014 | PDC | Third round | Simon Whitlock | 0–4 |
| 2015 | PDC | Second round | Cristo Reyes | 3–4 |
| 2016 | PDC | Second round | Phil Taylor | 1–4 |
| 2017 | PDC | Second round | Phil Taylor | 0–4 |
| 2018 | PDC | First round | Mensur Suljović | 0–3 |
| 2022 | WSDT | Semi-finals | Robert Thornton | 2–4 |
| 2023 | WSDT | Semi-finals | Robert Thornton | 0–3 |
| 2024 | WSDT | Second round | John Henderson | 1–3 |
| 2025 | WSDT | First round | Richie Burnett | 2–3 |
Comeback at MODUS Super Series and senior tour
But the blood was not where it should be. In the years that followed, Painter continued to play tournaments, although no longer among the professionals. Painter still appeared in the MODUS Super Series and also took part in various senior tour tournaments on several occasions.
However, he never reached his old level again. Painter was also increasingly hampered by dartitis. Nevertheless, he refuses to put his darts away for good and continues to pick and choose his tournaments even today.
A special legacy
Although Painter never collected the number of major titles that some of his contemporaries managed to win, his legacy remains a special one.
His name is inseparably linked to one of the most thrilling World Championship finals ever. He was the man who inflicted a historic defeat on Phil Taylor in 2001, the player who came close to dethroning Taylor in 2004 and, ultimately, the man who finally claimed his long-awaited major in 2011.
Kevin Painter may not have been the most successful player of his generation, but he was certainly one of the most memorable. His character, distinctive playing style and, above all, his enduring rivalry with Taylor turned him into a cult figure.
Read also
‘The Artist’ did not paint a career filled with major titles, but his most important works undoubtedly belong among the classics of professional darts.

Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 82visitors 3
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026







