
Who will win the 2025 PDC World Darts Championship? That is the question many connoisseurs, followers and fans will ponder as they fill in their predictions for the upcoming edition of the tournament at Alexandra Palace.
ADVERTISEMENT
To help these people, Dartsnews.com asked ChatGPT to make a prediction. The clever chatbot predicted round by round all the results of the upcoming Darts World Cup.
Some interesting predictions emerged from the answers. For example, the chatbot expects Fallon Sherrock to win from Ryan Meikle in the first round of the World Darts Championship, so that in the second round we get a duel between Sherrock and Luke Littler. This clash will then be won 3-1 in sets by "The Nuke".
Read also
Starting in the second round, the top-32 players in the world rankings will be in action. The chatbot expects the tournament to end right away for Mike de Decker, Ritchie Edhouse, Daryl Gurney and Joe Cullen. ChatGPT thinks Peter Wright will play a relatively good world championship. The Scot has been struggling with his form for over a year and a half, but according to the prediction, he will make it to the last sixteen in Ally Pally with a 4-1 victory over James Wade.
The chatbot does not foresee a stunt by Raymond van Barneveld against Luke Humphries at the last 32, but does think that Gian van Veen manages to win from Rob Cross. Dirk van Duijvenbode pulls through after a thriller against Stephen Bunting, while Josh Rock takes care of Chris Dobey's elimination.
At the last sixteen, Humphries must pull out all the stops to beat Peter Wright 4-3 in sets, while Dirk van Duijvenbode makes it to the quarterfinals of the World Darts Championship for the second time in his career. According to the prediction, Noppert provides a huge stunt in the eighth finals by eliminating title favorite Luke Littler 4-3. Nathan Aspinall prevents a Dutch clash by beating Gian van Veen 4-2. At the other end of the bracket, Michael Smith, Gerwyn Price and Michael van Gerwen easily reach the last eight, while Dave Chisnall wins over Dimitri van den Bergh after a final set.
ADVERTISEMENT
The eight remaining players return to the stage in the new year. For Aspinall, the year 2025 starts successfully according to ChatGPT, as a 5-2 win over Noppert qualifies him for the semifinals. Gerwyn Price can also look forward to a spot in the last four, as the prediction has him winning 5-4 over Smith. Humphries puts an end to a good tournament by Van Duijvenbode, who can leave the Alexandra Palace with his head held high with a 5-3 defeat. Van Gerwen does reach the semifinals as the only Dutchman after a 5-2 victory over Chisnall.
In the semifinals, defending champion Humphries proved too strong for Aspinall, 6-4, while Van Gerwen may go on for his fourth world title after a 6-3 win over Price in the semifinals. The world title remains in Humphries' possession, however, as 'Cool Hand' wins the World Cup final 7-4 in sets, according to the chatbot.
Prediction World Darts Championship 2025 according to ChatGPT
First round
Thibault Tricole 3-1 Joe Comito
Nick Kenny 3-0 Stowe Buntz
Jermaine Wattimena 3-0 Stefan Bellmont
Wesley Plaisier 3-2 Ryusei Azemoto
Alan Soutar 3-1 Kai Gotthardt
Madars Razma 3-2 Christian Kist
Connor Scutt 2-3 Ben Robb
Luke Woodhouse 3-1 Lourence Ilagan
Ryan Meikle 2-3 Fallon Sherrock
Ian White 3-0 Sandro Eric Sosing
Ryan Joyce 3-1 Darius Labanauskas
Mensur Suljovic 3-2 Matt Campbell
Scott Williams 3-0 Niko Springer
Ricardo Pietreczko 3-1 Xiaochen Zong
Cameron Menzies 3-2 Leonard Gates
Martin Lukeman 3-0 Nitin Kumar
Kevin Doets 3-0 Noa-Lynn van Leuven
Richard Veenstra 3-0 Alexis Toylo
Stephen Burton 3-1 Alexander Merkx
Karel Sedlacek 3-2 Rhys Griffin
Mickey Mansell 3-1 Tomoya Goto
Florian Hempel 1-3 Jeffrey de Zwaan
Kim Huybrechts 3-2 Keane Barry
Wessel Nijman 3-0 Cameron Carolissen
James Hurrell 3-2 Jim Long
Chris Landman 3-0 Lok Yin Lee
Jeffrey de Graaf 3-0 Rashad Sweeting
Jim Williams 3-1 Paolo Nebrida
Ricky Evans 3-1 Gordon Mathers
Niels Zonneveld 3-2 Robert Owen
William O'Connor 2-3 Dylan Slevin
Callan Rydz 3-0 Romeo Grbavac
Second round
Luke Humphries 3-1 Thibault Tricole
Raymond van Barneveld 3-0 Nick Kenny
James Wade 3-2 Jermaine Wattimena
Peter Wright 3-1 Wesley Plaisier
Stephen Bunting 3-0 Alan Soutar
Dirk van Duijvenbode 3-2 Madars Razma
Damon Heta 3-0 Ben Robb
Mike de Decker 1-3 Luke Woodhouse
Luke Littler 3-1 Fallon Sherrock
Ritchie Edhouse 2-3 Ian White
Danny Noppert 3-1 Ryan Joyce
Ryan Searle 3-2 Mensur Suljovic
Rob Cross 3-0 Scott Williams
Gian van Veen 3-2 Ricardo Pietreczko
Nathan Aspinall 3-1 Cameron Menzies
Andrew Gilding 3-1 Martin Lukeman
Michael Smith 3-0 Kevin Doets
Krzysztof Ratajski 3-1 Richard Veenstra
Chris Dobey 3-0 Stephen Burton
Josh Rock 3-1 Karel Sedlacek
Jonny Clayyton 3-0 Mickey Mansell
Daryl Gurney 2-3 Jeffrey de Zwaan
Gerwyn Price 3-1 Kim Huybrechts
Joe Cullen 0-3 Wessel Nijman
Michael van Gerwen 3-0 James Hurrell
Brendan Dolan 3-2 Chris Landman
Gary Anderson 3-1 Jeffrey de Graaf
Ross Smith 3-2 Jim Williams
Dave Chisnall 3-1 Ricky Evans
Gabriel Clemens 3-2 Niels Zonneveld
Dimitri van den Bergh 3-1 Dylan Slevin
Martin Schindler 3-2 Callan Rydz
Last 32
Luke Humphries 4-2 Raymond van Barneveld
Peter Wright 4-1 James Wade
Dirk van Duijvenbode 4-3 Stephen Bunting
Damon Heta 4-1 Luke Woodhouse
Luke Littler 4-2 Ian White
Danny Noppert 4-3 Ryan Searle
Rob Cross 2-4 Gian van Veen
Nathan Aspinall 4-1 Andrew Gilding
Michael Smith 4-0 Krzysztof Ratajski
Chris Dobey 2-4 Josh Rock
Jonny Clayton 4-1 Jeffrey de Zwaan
Gerwyn Price 4-0 Wessel Nijman
Michael van Gerwen 4-0 Brendan Dolan
Gaary Anderson 4-3 Ross Smith
Dave Chisnall 4-1 Gabriel Clemens
Dimitri van den Bergh 4-2 Martin Schindler
Last 16
Luke Humphries 4-3 Peter Wright
Dirk van Duijvenbode 4-2 Damon Heta
Luke Littler 3-4 Danny Noppert
Gian van Veen 2-4 Nathan Aspinall
Michael Smith 4-2 Josh Rock
Gerwyn Price 4-1 Jonny Clayton
Michael van Gerwen 4-1 Gary Anderson
Dave Chisnall 4-3 Dimitri van den Bergh
Quarterfinals
Luke Humphries 5-3 Dirk van Duijvenbode
Danny Noppert 2-5 Nathan Aspinall
Michael Smith 4-5 Gerwyn Price
Michael van Gerwen 5-2 Dave Chisnall
Semi-final
Luke Humphries 6-4 Nathan Aspinall
Gerwyn Price 3-6 Michael van Gerwen
Finale
Luke Humphries 7-4 Michael van Gerwen

According to ChatGPT, Luke Humphries will be world champion again in 2025

Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026





