DartsNews Podcast | UK Open 2026: Dark horses, seeds in danger and the draw only Luke Littler shouldn’t fear
PDC
Minehead’s FA Cup of darts returns this weekend, and if there is one tournament that thrives on unpredictability, it is the UK Open. Open draw. Outer boards. Top seeds entering cold. Early round chaos. It is the one major where reputations can unravel in an afternoon.
ADVERTISEMENT
On the latest episode of The DartsNews Podcast, co-hosts Kieran Wood and Nicolas Gayer broke down every angle of the 2026 edition, from title favourite to dark horse, from seeds under pressure to whether the recent surge of nine-darters will continue on the Minehead stage.
And while the field is stacked and the format notoriously unforgiving, one conclusion stood out during the debate. There may be only one player in the entire draw who genuinely does not need to fear it.
Luke Littler. The rest of the field? Far more complicated.
The man who fears no draw
The UK Open’s randomness is what makes it dangerous. An open draw from round three means there is no protected route, no guaranteed soft landing. You could be world champion and still find yourself staring at a heavyweight in your very first match.
Which makes it notable that both hosts still arrived at the same conclusion when asked who would lift the 2026 title. “I have not gone for a shock,” Wood said. “I’ve gone for Luke Littler. I don’t think I really need to explain it, if I’m honest.”
ADVERTISEMENT

Luke Littler will fear no man.
There was no hesitation. No long caveat. Just acceptance of the current hierarchy.
Wood did acknowledge the one theoretical risk. “The only thing that could get him unstuck is a nightmare early draw, where he gets Luke Humphries first off, or something like that.”
That is the tension at the heart of the UK Open. The draw can create chaos in seconds.
But Gayer’s response was clear. “In the end, there are so many players in this draw, and there’s only one of them who doesn’t have to fear any draw. Whatever he gets drawn against, he is the favourite. Even if it is Gian van Veen or Luke Humphries, he’s still the clear favourite. That’s how good he is.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Read also
And that is the key difference this year. The UK Open is designed to level things out. Shorter races early on. Atmosphere that can swing quickly. But even inside that chaos, Littler stands apart because the variables do not alter his status. A “nightmare” pairing still begins with him as favourite.
That is what shapes the tournament narrative. If he performs to standard, the rest are effectively playing catch-up. If he stumbles, the entire event blows wide open.
And in a competition built on unpredictability, that is a remarkable position to hold.
ADVERTISEMENT
The dark horses
If Littler represents certainty, the rest of the UK Open field represents opportunity.
When asked to identify the most dangerous outsider for Minehead, Wood opted for recent ProTour form over romantic longshots. “For the biggest dark horse, I’ve gone for Ross Smith.”
The reasoning was rooted in what Smith has already shown in 2026. “He had a strong Players Championship week, won the title, backed it up the next day with another deep run. He’s hitting these big averages, firing in the 180s as he does when he’s at his best. He’s already a proven major winner at the Europeans a few years ago. And I just think that if he does get a luck of the draw and avoids people like Littler, it could open up for him.”
Smith’s early-season form matters because it removes the usual question mark around him. At his best he can beat anyone, but the issue has often been sustaining that level across multiple matches in a weekend. Winning a Players Championship title and backing it up the following day suggests that sharpness is already there in 2026.
ADVERTISEMENT

Ross Smith has been in great form.
Gayer’s pick stayed within that same competitive bracket but leaned more into structural suitability. “My dark horse for the title is Wessel Nijman.”
Nijman is hardly a speculative shout. He has already lifted a Players Championship title in 2026 and continues to edge closer to the sport’s upper tier. The argument here was not about whether he has the level. It was about whether the UK Open format could enhance it.
“I thought about it and the UK Open could be quite good for him because there are a lot of outer boards and a second stage and smaller boards. I think that could be something that suits him better. Obviously in the main arena you have masses of fans and a real heated atmosphere. But not playing constantly in the spotlight with the big TV cameras could suit him. If the draw goes his way, I expect him to play on the outer boards a lot.”
Nijman has already proven he can win on the floor. The question in Minehead is whether he can finally translate that into a deep run on the TV stage
ADVERTISEMENT
In a tournament where the favourite stands alone at the top, the dark horse conversation becomes less about shock value and more about timing, form and draw position.
And both Smith and Nijman have reasons to believe this weekend could align.
Seeds in danger
If the UK Open offers freedom to outsiders, it offers very little protection to those seeded inside the top 32.
When asked which seed looked most vulnerable heading into Minehead, Wood pointed to the Australian number one. “I’ve gone for Damon Heta.”
ADVERTISEMENT
The reasoning was rooted in context rather than collapse. “Purely because he’s not started 2026 well at all. And at the moment he’s fallen outside of the World Matchplay spots. So if he does have a bad UK Open, there’s going to be a lot of extra pressure on him.”
That pressure matters at Minehead. The UK Open does not ease players into the weekend. Short formats. Quick turnarounds. Random draws. For someone already searching for rhythm, that can magnify uncertainty rather than settle it.
Gayer’s answer was more direct. “For me, it’s Dimitri Van den Bergh.”
The numbers tell their own story. After opening the season with a 103 average in a narrow win, Van den Bergh has struggled badly on the ProTour, averaging in the 70s on multiple occasions and losing heavily.
“He’s won two games this season so far,” Gayer said. “If you average 75, you’re not going to win matches.”
ADVERTISEMENT
There is no disguising poor form in darts. The average sits next to your name.
Wood’s assessment of Van den Bergh leaned towards psychology. “I think for Dimi, it’s more mental than anything else. He’s always been one that overthinks everything about darts. If you’re losing on repeat and overthinking every dart, that’s going to catch up with you.”
Minehead may not offer mercy. A favourable draw can help, but the UK Open does not allow players to hide. If confidence is fragile, the open format can expose it quickly.
For Heta and Van den Bergh, this weekend is not just about a deep run. It is about halting momentum in the wrong direction.
Read also
Will the nine-darter streak continue?
If recent weeks are any indication, Minehead may not just deliver drama. It may deliver perfection.
The early months of 2026 have already produced a surge of nine-darters across the ProTour and Premier League stage, and that momentum fed directly into the final prediction.
When asked whether there would be a nine-darter at the UK Open, Wood did not hesitate. “I’ve said yes. It’s just been nine-darters everywhere. Three on the Pro Tour, one in the Premier League the other night. I can’t see how, with all these players and all these matches across the board, there won’t be at least one.”
The logic is simple. Volume increases probability. The UK Open’s structure means more matches than a standard major. More matches mean more legs. More legs mean more chances.
Gayer agreed with the prediction, but went one step further by naming his candidate. “I’ve gone with Mensur Suljovic.”
The Austrian has quietly been producing some of his strongest numbers in years, posting 105-plus averages on the floor and even firing in a 108 average in defeat earlier this month. “He’s been playing fantastic darts lately,” Gayer commented.
Suljovic’s resurgence has been one of the subtler stories of the early season. After hovering near the Tour Card cut line in recent campaigns, he now looks sharper and freer at the oche. In a tournament that rewards rhythm and repetition, that kind of scoring level makes him a credible shout for perfection.
Wood, meanwhile, offered a more headline-grabbing name. “I’ll go for Beau Greaves again. Why not?”
Greaves has already made history this season and continues to push boundaries on the ProTour. If the nine-darter trend continues, it would feel fitting for one of the sport’s most talked-about players to be involved again.
Whether it comes from a former major champion, an in-form outsider or the sport’s newest headline act, the expectation is clear.
In a week where chaos is guaranteed, perfection may not be far behind.
And in Minehead, those two often arrive together.
Read also

Kieran WoodDarts Journalist
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He contributes to DartsNews.com, where he covers professional darts through news, match reports, analysis, and live coverage across the PDC calendar and major tournaments.
A key part of his work is on-site reporting from leading events. Kieran has covered the PDC World Darts Championship in person, reporting daily from the venue and providing first-hand insight from the tournament. During his coverage, he has conducted interviews with leading players including Luke Littler, Luke Humphries, and Gerwyn Price.
He is also one of the leading voices of the English-language Dartsnews Podcast, contributing regular analysis and discussion on developments across the professional darts circuit.
In his reporting, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 1visitors 1
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026









