DISCUSSION | Czech Darts Open 2026: Darts fans want Littler, Humphries, Van Gerwen and Price – but why does their dominance bother them?
PDC
Is darts becoming too predictable and does it have a dilemma as the European Tour came to town this weekend at the Czech Darts Open in Prague with a final lauded in Luke Littler v Luke Humphries. But is it an issue that the leading duo appearing on the European Tour together for the first time in months leads to the usual which some fans are getting bored of?
ADVERTISEMENT
Also the fact that in reality, the European Tour has been great for months perhaps due to the big names deciding to skip it and the lack of accountability also for those who decide not to bother. E.g Luke Littler has not played in Germany unless he is forced to.
But with excellence from Beau Greaves also, it perhaps highlights in today's discussion that while the jury is out on the big stars, the stories stretch further than those at the top of the darting pyramid.
Results at a glance - Czech Darts Open
Round Three
Read also
| Player 1 | Score | Player 2 |
| Gerwyn Price | 6-1 | Cameron Menzies |
| Ross Smith | 6-3 | Gian van Veen |
| William O’Connor | 6-5 | Josh Rock |
| Luke Humphries | 6-3 | Andrew Gilding |
| Jonny Clayton | 6-4 | Keane Barry |
| Michael van Gerwen | 6-4 | Wessel Nijman |
| Danny Noppert | 6-5 | Luke Woodhouse |
| Luke Littler | 6-3 | Krzysztof Ratajski |
Quarter-Finals
ADVERTISEMENT
| Player 1 | Score | Player 2 |
| Gerwyn Price | 6-4 | Ross Smith |
| Luke Humphries | 6-3 | William O’Connor |
| Michael van Gerwen | 6-3 | Jonny Clayton |
| Luke Littler | 6-0 | Danny Noppert |
Semi-Finals
| Player 1 | Score | Player 2 |
| Luke Humphries | 7-4 | Gerwyn Price |
| Luke Littler | 7-3 | Michael van Gerwen |
Final
| Player 1 | Score | Player 2 |
| Luke Littler | 8-6 | Luke Humphries |
ADVERTISEMENT
Darting dilemma - big names making European Tour stale and holding tour to ransom at other times
Nicolas Gayer, Editor for DartsNews.DE highlights the key issue with the European Tour and the dilemma that now faces the sport with big names deciding to skip events and the qualification system becoming tiresome vs it being stale when they do play.
In my opinion, the 2026 Czech Darts Open perfectly highlighted the dilemma that many darts fans — and perhaps even the sport as a whole — currently find themselves facing.
This season, it has almost become the norm for European Tour events to take place without a significant number of the world’s top players. Time and again, the biggest names are withdrawing from tournaments in an attempt to manage an increasingly demanding schedule.
Some fans take issue with that, arguing that the absence of the sport’s biggest stars devalues these events. Others enjoy the variety and the opportunity to see fresh faces making their way into the latter stages of tournaments. At the same time, there is also a sizeable section of the darts community that is fundamentally unhappy with the European Tour qualification system — regardless of which players ultimately decide to compete.
ADVERTISEMENT

Littler v Humphries again?!
The 2026 Czech Darts Open was a perfect reflection of that debate. Social media made it clear that there is currently a certain level of frustration within the darts community. Some fans were delighted by a star-studded semi-final line-up featuring world champions Luke Littler, Luke Humphries, Michael van Gerwen and Gerwyn Price, while others were frustrated by just how predictable the tournament had become.
After this weekend in Prague, however, there is probably one thing everyone can agree on: from a purely sporting perspective, this event delivered. We saw plenty of matches played at an outstanding level, while several of the game’s biggest stars appear to be hitting form just in time for the most important months of the year.
'Seen Littler v Humphries more than some family members'
Samuel Gill, Head Editor for DartsNews.com agrees with Nicolas' point re the big names.
ADVERTISEMENT
"For me ultimately I agree with Nicolas' take re the big names. For me the European Tour is honestly at its best when we have stories like Ross Smith and Gary Anderson last week (both big names but not ones who skip tournaments).
"Sure it is great to have Littler and co back at it, but I think darts does need a widescale change. Whether that is the European Tour where for some reason they get backdoor entry and then don't play down to World Series or Premier League.
"When like me you report on darts all year round, I've seen Littler v Humphries more than I've seen family members at times this year. It is not a fun tie anymore and often Littler wins anyway. So while it might get lauded by a certain section, it highlights that either they need to be forced to play or we need something different. The event delivered sure but also it perhaps is a real barometer as to where the sport has gone to in being both at it speak and stale."
Read also
A different take on Luke Littler's 'refreshing' return
ADVERTISEMENT
Pieter Verbeek, Editor for DartsNieuws.com sees it differently in that it was refreshing to see the big names back.
"It was certainly refreshing to see virtually all of the world’s biggest names back in action on the European Tour for once. And, to be fair, almost all of them lived up to expectations. Luke Littler, Michael van Gerwen, Luke Humphries and Gerwyn Price making up the semi-final line-up — that would not have looked out of place at the World Championship.
"For Van Gerwen in particular, reaching the semi-finals was a welcome result. After battling past Mario Vandenbogaerde, ‘Mighty Mike’ produced impressive performances against Wessel Nijman and Jonny Clayton, although his level dropped considerably when he averaged just 83 against Luke Littler in the semi-finals. Nevertheless, a run to the last four should give Van Gerwen some confidence heading into the crucial autumn period, with the Dutchman having a significant amount of prize money to defend at the World Darts Championship in particular.
"In the end, it was none other than Littler who lifted the trophy in Prague. It was only his third European Tour appearance of the season, yet he has already collected two European Tour titles in 2026 following his earlier triumph in Poland. It was yet another indication that ‘The Nuke’s’ hunger for silverware is far from satisfied this season."
Mats Leering, Editor for DartsNieuws.com also saw it as good due to the high level of the field in Prague assembled.
ADVERTISEMENT
"As I predicted, Luke Littler’s return to the European Tour immediately delivered another final between the two Lukes, with the reigning world champion once again coming out on top, just as expected.
"The tournament as a whole, however, was played at an exceptionally high level, helped in no small part by the sheer number of big names in the field. Michael van Gerwen also enjoyed a much-needed deep run, picking up impressive victories over Wessel Nijman and Jonny Clayton before eventually seeing his challenge ended by Littler in the semi-finals.
"Beau Greaves also made history, becoming the first woman ever to win a match on the European Tour. Her run came to an end in the second round against Luke Humphries, but with an average of close to 100, she once again showed that she is more than capable of competing with the very best in the game."
Saturday evening was basically a boosted World Series event
Lucas Michael, Editor for DartsNews.com saw other storylines other than the two Luke's and came to the conclusion also that Humphries would've won again if Littler didn't.
ADVERTISEMENT
"Every top player aside from James Wade competed in the Czech Darts Open. It only makes sense that the final would be competed between Luke Littler and Luke Humphries who both coincidentally had 29 PDC titles apiece before a dart was thrown. Obviously, that changed in the way of the two-time world champion whose sensational form prolongs.
"If Littler did not exist, Humphries may have been crowned the king of Prague with the amount of success he has/would have had in this city. However, his troubles defeating ‘The Nuke’ on the big stage showcase itself once more. He may be the best of the rest, but when Littler is competing that mostly ends in a runner-up trophy.
"In that final, they were averaging basically the same throughout, whether that was 88 or 94. Despite the parity, the scoreboard stated a Littler lead. Bad news for Humphries, who at his absolute best can compete toe to toe with Littler. However, he may only play his best darts every two or three games. For Littler, it is seven or eight, and that may not be the case because is a 108 average Littler’s B game?
"Away from the two Luke’s, there were a lot of brilliant storylines. Michael van Gerwen’s form is a flip of a coin. Sometimes good sometimes not. Even vintage van Gerwen would be impressed to get three legs in that semi-final against Littler with an 83 average. The consistency showcased over these last few years has been so poor. The brilliant highs are predominantly headlined by woeful lows. Fortunately, that semi-final run was enough to put him in a provisional spot for the 2027 World Matchplay. That could change with a deep run at Ally Pally, but there has to be real concerns over ‘The Green Machine’ with a busy period coming up.
"Saturday evening was basically a boosted World Series event. Eight Premier League Darts against some immense talents coming their way. It was a delightful evening of darts which highlights the popularity of this event. Humphries after the final defeat said that he will be back next year, and that will most likely be the case for a lot of the best players in the world. The European Tour is questionably the pinnacle of darts from a certain point of view, and while there are positives from the big guns not turning up, it is a lot better when they do.

Beau Greaves again had another good weekend.
"However, on that topic it seems that Littler is done until Dortmund. That opens the door for basically everyone to win a title and make some progress in the next tournaments in Antwerp, Basel and Maastricht. The European Championship will take place from October 22-25 with some top players still not confirmed to qualify. Gary Anderson may call it a day after an early exit in Prague. However, the big one is Stephen Bunting. He was the only Premier League player not to win that Saturday evening, and his form is concerning. He has won just six matches on the European Tour this year and has skipped just two of them. There is no doubt that Bunting is one of the best players in the world, but 2026 has simply not been his year.
"A final word has to go to Beau Greaves. The trailblazer will continue to inspire the next generation of women darters with her breakthrough event on the European Tour. It will not be long before she is in all of these events and even lofting a trophy high over her head. Her draws in her first two events have not been kind, but the performances have been mesmerising. Keep giving her opportunities, and she will take one of them eventually. This is a serious darting force ready to explode, and darts will be a better sport for it."

Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026





