"He is concerned that his throw has changed a bit" – Injury troubles have left their mark on Michael Smith
PDC
Michael Smith is concerned about his throw. The former world champion suspects that his technique may have changed without him noticing, due to his ongoing injury problems. Analyst Dan Dawson has also spotted signs that the Englishman now throws from a slightly different position.
ADVERTISEMENT
Smith reached the third round of a European Tour event for only the fifth time this season at last weekend’s Swiss Darts Trophy. His run ended with a 6-3 defeat to Dirk van Duijvenbode.
The 36-year-old Englishman has endured several extremely difficult years since winning the world title in early 2023. Smith suffers from chronic arthritis in his throwing hand, his right hand, and in both wrists. The problems stem from fractures he sustained at the age of 19.
A shoulder injury added to his troubles. Smith suffered a grade-two injury to the acromioclavicular joint (AC joint) in his shoulder. The problems began after a scooter accident and a fall while playing with his children. Since then, he has needed scans, treatment and ongoing injury management.
The physical problems have taken their toll. Smith has now fallen out of the world’s top 32 and risks ending his first full season without reaching a major quarter-final since 2013.
Dawson spots a change in Smith’s throw
Darts commentator and analyst Dan Dawson believes the injuries may now be affecting “Bully Boy’s” technique. Smith himself is also said to be concerned.
“Michael Smith was talking yesterday prior to his game about how he is concerned that his throw has changed a bit," he said on the coverage. He’s throwing from a slightly lower starting position. It’s about that elbow dropping. I hadn’t really picked up on it."
ADVERTISEMENT
Dawson believes the technical difference is small, but in a sport where fine details can decide matches, even a slight change can have an impact.
“It will be a small change if it is, but he might have something there. That arm back in the World Championship-winning times, maybe it was a little higher.
Smith became world champion in 2023.
Dawson also feels it would be no surprise if Smith’s throwing technique had changed after all the physical problems he has faced. Dawson cannot say for certain though whether there has been a lasting technical change.
“But when you have had such significant damage done to that shoulder, it might not be a surprise that something has changed there. The throwing action looks good, but obviously if it is coming from a lower position, then everything has to change slightly. Now, I don’t know if that is right or not, but I do know that is on his mind.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Comparison with Van Gerwen
Co-commentator Dan McCarthy then drew a comparison with Michael van Gerwen. The three-time world champion has also seen his throwing technique change over the years, partly because of physical problems.
“It still looks pretty smooth. But if you are going to have injury problems the biomechanics are probably going to change," he said.
Read also
“Look at Michael van Gerwen. The way his throw has changed from ten years ago. It’s almost unrecognisable because of the wrist issues he’s had. It’s exactly the same with Michael Smith.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Despite all the setbacks, Smith is determined to get his career back on track. The 2023 world champion wants to put this difficult period behind him and has already made a clear promise for next season that he will play everything.
Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026
- Not even slightly interestedrick6730-10-2026
- And yet the PDC has decided to aggravate this problem by doubling the Players Championship Finals field from 2027. I can't imagine there will be fewer withdrawals next year with even less reason to turn up. I can only hope that a whole slew of Challenge Tour top-up players receive enough prize money in the absence of much of the elite, that some of the more complacent among them struggle to scrape into even a heavily diluted field! More semi-pro players will get to test their mettle, but the standard of competition will be much inferior. It could hardly be said that the Players Championship series will provide an opportunity for darts' second string to test their Tour Card credentials anymore, but at least it will underscore the achievements of those Challenge Tour players of current and previous years, who were able to prove themselves as more than capable of competing with, and beating, the elite of the sport on a consistent basis, and reaping the due rewards.Deduce635828-10-2026
- No point in being there? Champions want to win.Deduce635828-10-2026