“He’s one of the best players that’s ever lived” – Paul Nicholson expects a motivated James Wade to prove a point at UK Open
PDCThe build-up to the 2026 UK Open carries extra emotion as James Wade prepares to replicate last year’s performance – not only for the prestige of the FA Cup of Darts, but also to make a point after his surprising and painful omission from the 2026 Premier League Darts lineup.
ADVERTISEMENT
Now 42, Wade came close to two major titles in 2025. He reached the finals of both the UK Open and the World Matchplay, but on both occasions, the young sensation Luke Littler stood in his way. Yet despite those achievements, Wade was not selected for the Premier League campaign. The decision caused surprise in the darts world – and plenty of frustration for the player himself.
“It felt like a complete kick in the privates”
“It felt like a complete kick in the privates,” Wade said of the disappointment surrounding his rejection at the time.
Wade indicated that he believes it isn’t just about performances. He senses he might be seen as “awkward” or as someone whose personality doesn’t align with what the PDC and TV producers want. Although Wade chooses his words carefully, the undertone is clear: he feels excluded for reasons that go beyond sporting results.
Read also
Extra sharp
For darts analyst and former professional Paul Nicholson, that is precisely why Wade will be extra sharp this weekend at Butlin’s Minehead. Nicholson, an experienced commentator and analyst from the media side, sees Wade as one of the major outsiders for a deep run.
ADVERTISEMENT
“The UK Open these days takes on a slightly different significance for ex-Premier League players, people who may have been shunned,” Nicholson said in an interview with The Sun. “You look at someone like James Wade, who’s been very vocal about not being included in the Premier League when he thought he had a legitimate shot."
"We looked at Mike De Decker last year after the same sort of narrative," he adds. “So I’m looking at James Wade. I look at how many times he’s won the thing and how close he’s been in the last 12 months to getting another major championship."
Nicholson is referring to the fact that Wade fought his way to the UK Open final last year – and that he also reached the World Matchplay final in 2025, yet that still wasn’t enough to secure a Premier League spot.
“I’ve got two points about James at the minute. I don’t think he pays himself enough credit for what he’s done in his career," Nicholson says. “I’ve been on the end of some hidings from James. I’ve seen him over the last 20 years do incredible things. And he’s one of the best players that’s ever lived."

James Wade has already won the UK Open three times
ADVERTISEMENT
Can Wade win the UK Open for a fourth time?
The UK Open is known as the FA Cup of darts. The open draw means top players can meet early, a draw full of uncertainty and upsets, and that’s exactly why it is loved by fans and players. This year, the big names, including Wade, start in the fourth round, but from that point on, anything can happen.
Nicholson stresses that Wade may need that extra nudge: “Someone might have to take Luke Littler out for him to get the title back.”
Read also
Why wasn’t Wade selected for Premier League Darts?
ADVERTISEMENT
The debate around the Premier League selection now centres on one question: why wasn’t Wade chosen? According to Nicholson, it wasn’t due to any hidden agenda from the PDC or Sky Sports, but more a feeling that other players had done just a touch more in the preceding season.
"I spoke to at least 15 people about the Premier League line-up before it was announced," he recalls. “And none of them had James Wade on the list. So that can’t be a coincidence."
He adds that Wade might make life a bit harder for himself with his character and manner of speaking, but that doesn’t mean his results weren’t legitimate. "It’s not the PDC board or the broadcaster having something against James. It’s just that a lot of us felt that other people had done just a little bit more than him," Nicholson insists. “If there’s been 10 players in the Premier League, I think he had a legitimate shot. Eight was just too much of a squeeze."
“But when it comes to his face fitting, he can’t forget that he used to be littler. When he was 17, he was winning world ranked titles in the BDO. He went to Switzerland and won a title very, very early on. And he switched to the PDC at a very young age," Nicholson concludes. “In 2007, he was Littler. He was the young star and he was the one that was winning. And consequently, he would be in the Premier League. But it is harder to get into that Premier League than it once was."
“There used to be a time where you’d make the Matchplay final, UK Open final, something else, and that would be enough to get in. These days, you just can’t get in by doing that amount. You’ve got to win something or do something extra.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Read also

Kieran WoodDarts Journalist
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He contributes to DartsNews.com, where he covers professional darts through news, match reports, analysis, and live coverage across the PDC calendar and major tournaments.
A key part of his work is on-site reporting from leading events. Kieran has covered the PDC World Darts Championship in person, reporting daily from the venue and providing first-hand insight from the tournament. During his coverage, he has conducted interviews with leading players including Luke Littler, Luke Humphries, and Gerwyn Price.
He is also one of the leading voices of the English-language Dartsnews Podcast, contributing regular analysis and discussion on developments across the professional darts circuit.
In his reporting, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026







