"I struggled with dartitis about three and a half years ago and now here we are": Gian van Veen completes emotional turnaround to reach World final
PDCGian van Veen admitted he was still “pinching himself” after reaching the PDC World Darts Championship final, following an extraordinary semi-final victory over childhood hero Gary Anderson at Alexandra Palace.
ADVERTISEMENT
The 23-year-old Dutchman produced one of the matches of the tournament to defeat Anderson in a classic encounter that featured relentless scoring, huge checkouts, including both players hitting 170s, and sustained pressure from a partisan crowd.
“It feels amazing, of course,” van Veen said. “Being a child, I wasn’t even dreaming about getting to a final. My first ever dream was just to be in the World Championship. But here we are, and it feels amazing. I’ve told everyone the past couple of days that I’m still pinching myself, and I won’t stop pinching myself.”
A semi-final classic against a childhood hero
Van Veen came from a set down to win four on the spin and never hid how much he enjoyed every moment of the contest — even as the crowd largely backed Anderson. “I enjoyed every single second of it,” he said. “Gary played phenomenal today, especially in the fifth set when he started with a 10-dart leg and then hit a 170. But I still managed to get that set, and it was a fantastic game.
“Gary played so well, and when the crowd got involved I did get a bit frustrated. But I’m so relieved that I still got the job done in the end, even with the crowd against me. It’s fair play, because everyone knows I’m a Gary Anderson fan, so if they want Gary to win, I can’t blame them.”
Van Veen revealed that even during the match he found himself watching Anderson with admiration — something he quickly realised he had to curb. “I was standing behind him and it felt like he was hitting his 40th maximum. He was hitting so many triples and I was just enjoying watching him play. You shouldn’t be doing that in a World Championship semi-final, but that’s what I’m like. I enjoy playing darts, but I also enjoy watching the legends of the game.
“As soon as I realised I shouldn’t be doing that, I got my head down and played well, but yeah, I was really enjoying myself on that stage.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Read also
Crowd pressure and inner belief
One of the key moments in the match came when van Veen missed chances at double eight after a treble 17 left 67, allowing Anderson to take a crucial set.
“I was really frustrated — with the crowd and with myself for letting it bother me,” he admitted. “I think it was the set where it could have been 5–2 instead of 4–3.
“But then in the next set I hit a 59 checkout to go 5–3 up, and I said to myself, ‘OK, you can do it even when the crowd’s against you.’ That gave me such a good feeling for the rest of the game, especially the last set.”
ADVERTISEMENT
He added that overcoming that moment gave him lasting confidence.
“I knew in my head that even if the crowd’s against you, I’m still going to hit those doubles. It was very difficult, but it made me feel really good.”
Numbers, belief and momentum
Statistically, van Veen’s tournament has been outstanding, averaging over 102 and producing three 170 finishes.
“I’m very confident,” he said. “I’m playing so well this tournament. I think my lowest average has been around 97 or 98, so I’m feeling really good on that stage, especially in these formats.
ADVERTISEMENT
“Today was a very long game, but I still averaged 103 and my checkout percentage is really good. That gives me massive confidence going into tomorrow.”
He revealed that during the semi-final he was aware just how special the contest had become.
“After four or five sets I looked at the screen and saw we were both averaging 105. It felt like it as well. We both scored well, took our chances, and I knew it was a belter of a game.”
Facing Luke Littler on the biggest stage
Awaiting van Veen in the final is Luke Littler, whom he knows well from the Development Tour and ProTour. He expects an intense battle over a potential 13 sets. "It’s going to be very tough,” van Veen said. “He’s going to put you under pressure from set one. If I can keep up with his scoring — and my checkout percentage has been really good all year, hopefully I can take my chances. He’s probably the better scorer than I am, so I just need to keep up, take my chances, and then I’ve got a chance.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Van Veen reflected on their 2023 World Youth Championship final, where Littler announced himself on the global stage. “Going into that match I was actually favoured by the bookmakers, which sounds crazy now,” he said. “After that match I said to myself, ‘OK, now the whole world knows what Luke Littler is about.’ I knew what he was capable of, and he showed it.”
A new Dutch number one — but focus remains
Van Veen confirmed he has become the new Dutch number one but insisted it hasn’t distracted him.
“It’s only been 24 hours and today was all about this game,” he said. “I didn’t look at my phone much or read social media. As long as I’m still in the tournament, my focus is on the next game.”
He believes a world title would have huge significance back home.
ADVERTISEMENT
“For myself it would mean the absolute world, but also for the Netherlands. Michael van Gerwen and Raymond van Barneveld have been world champions, but it’s been a few years. Hopefully it would inspire young people to start playing darts.”
From dartitis to the World Championship final
Perhaps most remarkably, van Veen’s run comes just a few years after battling dartitis. “I struggled with dartitis about three and a half years ago,” he said. “And now here we are in the World Championship final. It’s something I’ll probably be pinching myself about for weeks.
“But the job’s still not done. I came here with one goal, to win the World Championship, and that’s still my goal.”
He offered heartfelt advice to players facing similar struggles. “As long as you enjoy playing darts, it doesn’t matter if you’re averaging 50 or 90, winning or losing. Just enjoy playing darts. There’s pressure and stress, but if you enjoy it, everything will be OK.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Praise from Gary Anderson and belief earned
Van Veen revealed Anderson’s words after the match meant a lot “He said to me, ‘Go and win it now,’” van Veen said. “He felt it was a fantastic game and wanted me to go on and win it.”
After beating Luke Humphries and Gary Anderson back-to-back, van Veen feels he has earned his place on the biggest stage. “If I manage to win the title tomorrow, I don’t think anyone would say it’s undeserved,” he said. “Beating players like that when they’re playing well shows me that I’m capable even with all the pressure.”

Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026






