“If you took £2 million away from Luke Littler's total, he would still be world No. 1” - The staggering gap between Luke Littler and the chasing pack exposed
PDC
The World Matchplay is not only the second-biggest ranking tournament of the PDC season, but also one of the year’s key moments for the world rankings. With £225,000 for the winner and sizable payouts for all other participants, the tournament in Blackpool traditionally has major consequences for the PDC Order of Merit.
ADVERTISEMENT
On his YouTube channel Edgar TV, former professional darter Matthew Edgar extensively analysed all the shifts in the world rankings. He discussed not only the winners and losers, but also looked ahead to the rest of the season and the battle for key positions, such as a spot in the world’s top 16 and even the Premier League Darts.
Plenty of movement outside the top 32
The first changes are already visible outside the top 32. Brendan Dolan drops two places because he did not compete at the World Matchplay, while Mensur Suljovic and Kim Huybrechts each climb one place.
According to Edgar, these are exactly the moments when the impact of a major ranking tournament becomes clear. "The World Matchplay is over, and as the second biggest ranking event on the PDC calendar, there's been plenty of movement in the rankings."
One of the biggest losers is Dimitri Van den Bergh. The Belgian slips no fewer than seven places and, according to Edgar, finds himself in a worrying situation.
Read also
“He's now in danger of falling outside the world's top 64, which means he'll be looking over his shoulder in terms of keeping his Tour Card. There are only 10 Players Championship events left, starting this week in Hildesheim.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Raymond van Barneveld also loses a position. The Dutchman was a World Matchplay participant a few years ago, but missed out this time in Blackpool, causing a slight drop.
On the other hand, Niko Springer is on the rise. The German climbs to 39th in the world rankings, a new personal best. “That is the highest ranking position ever for Niko Springer,” Edgar states. “He's still not defending any prize money yet, so everything he earns is simply added to his Order of Merit. He'll start defending money soon, but right now it's all profit, which means he's going to keep climbing.”
Edgar therefore expects Springer to continue moving up for the time being. “Niko Springer is definitely someone to keep an eye on.”
Dirk van Duijvenbode a dangerous opponent again
The World Matchplay also triggered significant shifts within the top 32. Daryl Gurney drops three places after missing the tournament, while Dave Chisnall gains one thanks to his late qualification and participation, despite his first-round loss to Wessel Nijman. Andrew Gilding fell two places because he failed to match his quarterfinal run from a few years ago.
ADVERTISEMENT
Edgar also had praise for Cameron Menzies. The Scot knocked out Luke Humphries, reached the second round, and ultimately had to withdraw from his match against Ross Smith. “Cameron Menzies is perhaps a little unfortunate. He beat Luke Humphries in the opening round and reached the second round. Had he beaten Ross Smith as well, he could have climbed even higher.”
Read also
The biggest climber in this part of the rankings, however, is Dirk van Duijvenbode. Thanks to his semifinal run, the Dutchman rises from 28th to 23rd in the world. According to Edgar, this could prove a pivotal moment in the career of ‘Aubergenius.’ “That semi-final run could be career-defining in the short term.”
By that, Edgar mainly refers to the fact that Van Duijvenbode seems to be returning to his old level after a long period of injuries. "After returning from injury he'd become something of a soft draw in the big events, but not anymore."
His win over Gary Anderson was especially impressive. “ He played extremely well, especially against Gary Anderson. Is this the start of Dirk working his way back towards the world's top 16? That's the interesting question.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Battle for the top 16 increasingly important
Nathan Aspinall remains firmly in 16th because his direct rivals made little ground. Jermaine Wattimena, Luke Woodhouse, Martin Schindler, Krzysztof Ratajski, and Damon Heta all earned only first-round prize money, leaving the gap to Aspinall largely unchanged. “Aspinall is still around £21,000 clear."
Ross Smith, by contrast, strengthened his position by reaching the quarterfinals. For Chris Dobey, Edgar does see potential issues emerging. “Chris Dobey, though, is starting to edge closer to the trapdoor, and that's significant.”
According to Edgar, a place in the top 16 is worth far more than just a nice number next to your name. "The benefits of being in the world's top 16 are huge. You get seeding, guaranteed places in events like the World Matchplay and World Grand Prix, probably the Grand Slam, and you also receive seeded positions on the European Tour. Once you're established in the top 16, it's much harder to fall out."
ADVERTISEMENT
Read also
Wessel Nijman continues to impress
Another player taking a huge step again is Wessel Nijman. The Dutchman climbs to 13th in the world rankings, setting a new personal best.
Edgar, however, expects this is far from the final destination. “Another career-high ranking, and I honestly think he'll continue climbing.” In fact, Edgar sees Nijman as a future Premier League player. “I think we're heading towards talking about him as a future Premier League player. That's the direction I see him going.”
Gary Anderson also benefits from his quarterfinal and rises one spot at the expense of Ryan Searle. His opening match, in which he averaged 109, makes Edgar optimistic. "It suggests there could still be even more to come from Gary.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Josh Rock also earns praise after his quarterfinal. “Josh Rock's quarter-final run was an excellent response after what happened in the Premier League. It was a really good bounce-back.”

Will we see Wessel Nijman in next year’s Premier League Darts?
Historic low for Michael van Gerwen
The most striking development at the top of the rankings concerns Michael van Gerwen. Due to his second-round defeat, the three-time world champion drops to seventh in the world. According to Edgar, that’s historic. “It's huge. Michael van Gerwen is now world No. 7, the lowest ranking he's had for around 13 years.”
That slide could have major consequences. “It means, under the current rules, he's no longer guaranteed a Premier League place because only the top four qualify automatically.”
ADVERTISEMENT
And that’s not all. Edgar points out that Van Gerwen has a lot of prize money to defend in the coming months. “There's also plenty more prize money for him to defend. Looking at the provisional end-of-year rankings, he's actually outside the world's top 16."
The World Championship could be decisive. “He's still got to defend his runner-up finish at the World Championship.” Still, Edgar doesn’t expect Van Gerwen to drop out of the top 16 entirely. “I think dropping out of the top 16 altogether is unlikely, but I do think sliding towards the bottom end of the top 16 is a very realistic possibility.”
Gerwyn Price back in the top four
Gerwyn Price’s run to the final lifts the Welshman three places. He rises from seventh to fourth in the world rankings, returning to a position that, under current rules, grants automatic Premier League entry.
ADVERTISEMENT
“What a performance," Edgar stated. "It was his first major final for three years and a fantastic week overall.”
Gian van Veen also came close to a huge leap in the world rankings. The Dutchman could even have taken second place from Luke Humphries had he won his semifinal.
Yet Edgar sees the current situation as favourable for both Humphries and Van Veen. Humphries again had little prize money to defend at the World Matchplay. “Over the next couple of years he won't have much prize money to defend from this event.”
Read also
Van Veen is also in a strong position. “Van Veen also doesn't have much major prize money to defend until next year's European Championship, so he's firmly established near the top as well.”
As a result, Edgar believes Price’s fourth place looks like the only spot that could realistically change in the short term. “Realistically, the only position likely to change in the short term is Gerwyn Price's No. 4 ranking, and even then someone would need a very deep run or a title to overtake him—which, as we all know at the moment, isn't easy with Luke Littler around.”
Luke Littler on course for a Phil Taylor-like era
The conclusion of Edgar’s analysis focused entirely on Luke Littler. The reigning world champion added another major to his tally and extended his lead over the field to unprecedented levels. “What a tournament he's had. He smashed records all week."
According to Edgar, Littler has now amassed more than £3 million in ranking prize money. The gaps are now almost beyond comprehension. “If you took £2 million away from Luke Littler's total—£1 million more than the current world No. 2 has—he would still be world No. 1.”
And that’s still not all. “If you combined the prize money of the world No. 2 and No. 3 players, they still wouldn't overtake him."
Even the combined totals of numbers two, three, and four are still not enough, according to Edgar. “Add in world No. 4 as well, and they still wouldn't go past him. It's ridiculous.”
Edgar sees clear parallels with Phil Taylor’s absolute peak. “We're talking about Phil Taylor-era dominance, which I honestly didn't think we'd ever see again.”
He still closes with an optimistic outlook. According to Edgar, Littler isn’t the only exceptional talent of the new generation. “The exciting thing, though, is that Luke Littler isn't the only talent coming through. There's an incredible conveyor belt of young players.”

Lucas MichaelDarts Journalist
Lucas Michael is a darts journalist and reporter based in Cambridge, UK, and has been part of the DartsNews team since 2025. He covers professional darts through reports, analysis, round-ups, and live coverage, with a focus on clear context and accurate reporting across the PDC calendar.
A key part of his work is liveblogging major tournaments throughout the year, providing real-time updates, match coverage, and contextual reporting across the professional circuit. He also reports regularly from events on site and has covered the PDC World Darts Championship from the venue, delivering first-hand insight throughout the tournament.
Within the newsroom, Lucas works closely with the editorial team and supports coverage alongside Chief Content Officer Samuel Gill and reporter Kieran Wood.
Lucas holds a BA (Hons) in Sports Journalism. In his work, he places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating content promptly when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026









