"I worry for Michael Smith - You start making excuses before you've thrown a dart" – Colin Lloyd fears injury concerns could end former world champion's career
PDC
Colin Lloyd has voiced concern over the future of Michael Smith’s career, warning that persistent injuries could derail the former world champion if they are not properly addressed.
ADVERTISEMENT
Smith, who lifted the Sid Waddell Trophy in 2023, has struggled with form and fitness in 2024 and 2025 and as such finds himself in the unfamiliar position of battling outside the upper echelons of the PDC Order of Merit. Speaking to Online Darts, Lloyd admitted he fears the nagging issues with Smith’s throwing arm may already be playing tricks on his mind. “I do worry for Michael. He’s a class player, and I’m not going to take that away from him. He has been – and possibly still is – one of the most frightening players out there,” Lloyd said.
“But he’s got these niggling little injuries, and niggles become big things. I hope in the period he’s had off he’s tried to address them. I’ve only seen snippets on social media, but if he’s got it sorted there’s no doubt about his talent," 'Jaws' continues. “If he hasn’t, though, niggles play funny tricks on your mind. Instead of focusing on who you are and what you can be, your brain starts playing tricks with you and you start looking for excuses before you’ve even gone up there and done anything.”
Lloyd stressed that Smith’s pedigree is beyond question, but made clear that unless the physical issues are solved, his long-term prospects could be under threat. “Hopefully, with the time off from missing the Matchplay, he’s had chance to reflect, sort things out, and spend time with his family. But now it’s time to go back to work. His talent is undoubted. If he’s right, he’ll push back up the rankings. He’s too good not to.”
Read also
Aspinall’s resurgence
While Lloyd’s words on Smith were cautious, he was more upbeat about Nathan Aspinall, who has also slid down the rankings after a summer of disappointment.
“I think Nathan does [get back],” Lloyd insisted. “He only dropped because of the Matchplay money – it was huge. But he’s in everything else, and two years ago he didn’t really have runs in those events, so he’ll be on a bonus now. I’m confident he’ll climb.”
ADVERTISEMENT

Aspinall, like Smith, has suffered a slide down the rankings recently
The rankings debate
The conversation inevitably turned to the ranking system itself, with critics arguing the two-year rolling format no longer reflects form “in the here and now.” Lloyd acknowledged those frustrations but argued that the structure remains part of the sport’s fabric.
“Maybe it is time to look at it,” he said. “But that two-year system has been in place for years. Everyone knows it going in – if you win something, you’ve got to defend it two years later. It’s not perfect, but that’s the system. If they do change it, it can’t happen overnight. And don’t think the PDC don’t look at these things. They do, and they want it to be fair. But players know what’s expected of them. You win a Pro Tour this Monday, you know exactly when you’ll be defending it.”
Read also
ADVERTISEMENT
Premier League shake-up?
Lloyd also addressed wider structural questions, particularly the ongoing debate about the Premier League. Many fans argue the invitational has become repetitive, with the same faces dominating year after year.
The former world No.1 floated one radical alternative: a golf-style qualification race to determine the line-up. “Do you just pick the top eight in the world, no wild cards?" Lloyd proposed.
"Or maybe a race like golf – the FedEx Cup, Race to Dubai. The PDC could pick certain events, Pro Tours, Euro Tours, majors, World Series. After the cut-off, those eight or ten are your Premier League," Lloyd continues. “I like that, actually. It gives you another race to follow, another narrative. Fans could track who might sneak in. It would give players a kick up the bum too. Some are just riding the wave, but others need a shake.”

Does the Premier League format need a change?
ADVERTISEMENT
A warning for the next generation
For Lloyd, the wider message was simple: darts has never offered more opportunity, but the hard work is relentless.
“Darts is in a very good place. It’s not just about prize money, though there’s a great living to be made. But don’t think getting a tour card means you’ve made it – that’s when the hard work begins," he analyses. “You’ve got to qualify for Euro Tours, you’ve got to get in majors. If you graft, you’ll be rewarded, not just financially but because your work is paying off. If you don’t, you’ll get found out quickly. Time waits for no one, and neither does darts.”
Lloyd’s words carry extra weight as someone who reached the very top of the sport, only to experience the pressures and pitfalls that come with it. His assessment of Smith – both respectful and wary – is a reminder that talent alone isn’t enough. For the 2023 world champion, the coming months will be crucial: either the injuries are behind him and the climb begins again, or the doubts that Lloyd has flagged could grow louder.
Read also
ADVERTISEMENT

Kieran WoodDarts Journalist
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He contributes to DartsNews.com, where he covers professional darts through news, match reports, analysis, and live coverage across the PDC calendar and major tournaments.
A key part of his work is on-site reporting from leading events. Kieran has covered the PDC World Darts Championship in person, reporting daily from the venue and providing first-hand insight from the tournament. During his coverage, he has conducted interviews with leading players including Luke Littler, Luke Humphries, and Gerwyn Price.
He is also one of the leading voices of the English-language Dartsnews Podcast, contributing regular analysis and discussion on developments across the professional darts circuit.
In his reporting, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 1visitors 1
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026






