“Littler has already said that he simply thinks Germany is a terrible country” — Van der Voort sees worrying trend in the PDC due to numerous withdrawals
PDC
Luke Littler and Wessel Nijman are the two standout performers of the first seven months of the PDC season, according to Vincent van der Voort. Yet the former professional also sees a trend he’s far less keen on. The wave of withdrawals by top players, especially on the Euro Tour, is becoming a serious issue for the PDC in his view.
ADVERTISEMENT
In the podcast Darts Draait Door, Van der Voort looked back on the opening stretch of the season. He didn’t need long to identify the player who stands head and shoulders above the rest.
"If you look at the whole picture, it's obviously Littler's year. Even though he hasn't played that much. And in his shadow, Nijman. Those are the two big names of the first half of the year."
Van der Voort believes Nijman has impressed particularly at the Players Championships and Euro Tours. Littler, meanwhile, is out on his own, despite the Englishman skipping a fair number of events on the calendar.
“Littler just thinks Germany is a terrible country”
That point leads Van der Voort to another striking theme of the season. While PDC prize money has surged, several big names seem more selective with their schedules. That’s visible in the many Euro Tour withdrawals. Earlier this season, multiple top-ranked players skipped various events.
Read also
"It's also a little bit the year of the withdrawals. And that is happening at exactly the moment when the prize money is going through the roof. That's strange, isn't it?"
ADVERTISEMENT
Van der Voort sees a particular problem when the biggest box-office names are missing. Littler is a clear example, he says. Many Euro Tours are staged in Germany, and that’s precisely where the world number one is rarely seen.
"Look, Littler has already said that he simply thinks Germany is a terrible country. But that is a problem, because that's where most of the European Tours are. And a few Pro Tours, of course. He doesn't usually come to those either. So you've already got your very best player who doesn't come very often."

Vincent van der Voort notes that many top players regularly withdraw from Euro Tours
Humphries, Price and Aspinall also regularly absent
It doesn’t stop there, according to Van der Voort. Luke Humphries also chose a spell with fewer Euro Tours during the season. "Then you've got Humphries. He wasn't feeling great during the Premier League. He said, 'I'm not doing any European Tours for the next three months.' So then you've got the number one and, at the time, the number two in the world."
ADVERTISEMENT
Van der Voort stresses that withdrawals from Players Championships are less problematic. Those floor events are played without spectators. The Euro Tour is a different story, because thousands of fans buy tickets to see the big names on stage.
Read also
"If they withdraw from Players Championships, that's not such a problem. Those are the smallest tournaments, and they don't necessarily have to play them. But the European Tour still relies on the public expecting everyone to be there."
Gerwyn Price and Nathan Aspinall also get a mention from Van der Voort as frequent absentees. "Then, of course, you've got Gerwyn Price. He's entered for everything, but he never comes. Then you've got someone like Aspinall, a crowd-puller. He hardly comes anymore either. As an organiser, you've got a problem there."
Van der Voort fears for Euro Tour’s pulling power
ADVERTISEMENT
Gary Anderson has also opted for a limited schedule for years. Van der Voort is barely surprised by that anymore. "He's been doing it for ten years, I think, in my view. And he's still always in the world's top 16. That remains pretty impressive."
Van der Voort believes a tricky situation is emerging for Euro Tour organisers. Events held during the congested first part of the season seem more likely to miss multiple stars.
Read also
"Ultimately, as an organiser, you want to have the best players. Now you're getting to the point where you think: if my European Tour is in the first half of the year, I'm screwed. After the Premier League, I have a chance that good players will come. That's obviously a bad development as well."
The late slot on the calendar could work in favour of the Dutch Euro Tour event. If the battle for key ranking spots is still hot, Van der Voort expects big names to be less inclined to skip. "You basically have to hope that from number 28 through to 34 or 35, everyone still has a chance. That, for example, Anderson really still has to play. Those kinds of players. So that you see it changing from day to day."
ADVERTISEMENT

Lucas MichaelDarts Journalist
Lucas Michael is a darts journalist and reporter based in Cambridge, UK, and has been part of the DartsNews team since 2025. He covers professional darts through reports, analysis, round-ups, and live coverage, with a focus on clear context and accurate reporting across the PDC calendar.
A key part of his work is liveblogging major tournaments throughout the year, providing real-time updates, match coverage, and contextual reporting across the professional circuit. He also reports regularly from events on site and has covered the PDC World Darts Championship from the venue, delivering first-hand insight throughout the tournament.
Within the newsroom, Lucas works closely with the editorial team and supports coverage alongside Chief Content Officer Samuel Gill and reporter Kieran Wood.
Lucas holds a BA (Hons) in Sports Journalism. In his work, he places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating content promptly when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026






