“It was like a game of tennis. You'd knock the ball back, you'd pass that test” – Rob Cross compares facing Luke Littler to peak Michael van Gerwen
PDC
Rob Cross knows better than anyone what it takes to beat an elite player on a big stage. The Englishman made history at the 2018 PDC World Darts Championship by defeating Michael van Gerwen and Phil Taylor back-to-back, so he understands how to make a true world‑class opponent crack under maximum pressure. According to Cross, the key against players of that calibre is not to outgun their top level, but to hang in and strike when the rare openings appear.
ADVERTISEMENT
The debate around Luke Littler has intensified in recent months. The young Englishman has become a player who can get into opponents’ heads before the first dart is thrown. Cross recognises that feeling but stresses a match isn’t lost until the final dart has gone.
“It's all about hanging in there. You're not going to get as many chances as if you played someone else,” Cross explains. “You're going to get many more chances. It's about taking your chances and trying to send them to somewhere where they don't want to be.”
For the former world champion, that’s exactly the difference when you face a generational talent. Against players like Littler, and previously Taylor and Michael van Gerwen, one small error can have major consequences. A single missed dart at a double can see a leg slip away completely.
Long tennis rally
Cross compares playing Van Gerwen to a long tennis rally. For years, the Dutchman imposed an extremely high standard on opponents, and anyone who failed to keep pace was punished without mercy.
Read also
“I would always say that years ago, when you played Michael, he had such a threshold and it was like a game of tennis. You'd knock the ball back, you'd pass that test, he'd knock it back and then you've got to answer again,” Cross reflects.
ADVERTISEMENT
Even so, you don’t need to throw better throughout to win a match like that. Cross points out that one good chance in a leg can be enough. That’s why it’s vital to stay upright when the opponent is firing.
“One dart sometimes is good enough in a leg to win, and if you miss it, you know, potentially it's a runaway or a freight train. So, yeah, you've got to hang on their shoulder and you've got to dig in as deep as you can.”

Rob Cross became world champion in 2018
Mental battle
That mental battle, Cross says, is at least as important as what the scoreboard shows. If you can plant doubt in a favourite’s mind, you can steer a match in a different direction. As a contest heads into its decisive phase, the pressure can keep ramping up.
ADVERTISEMENT
“Once you get past that, if you can get them maybe where they're a little bit nervous, if you can get them nervous or get them thinking.”
Cross isn’t just talking about playing the perfect match, but about creating doubt. A player who normally runs on autopilot can be forced by a tight game to consider the consequence of every dart. That, Cross believes, can be the moment a match turns.
“You can drag a bit of overtime where that game's getting a bit closer towards the end and try and pick the pieces up there,” he explains.
Read also
Timing plays a crucial role
ADVERTISEMENT
Timing is crucial in all of this. It’s not only about hitting doubles but about striking at the right moment. If you take your chances at the decisive time, you can turn a match even against a player throwing the higher average. “Your timing has to be good. The moment you take your chances has to be right. And you’ve got to be pretty solid on your own throw.”
Cross also looks at Littler’s recent form. At the World Matchplay in Blackpool, the young Englishman again showed how ruthless he can be. Once Littler hit his rhythm, opponents found it almost impossible to stop him.
“On the first attempt, maybe there was a chance there,” Cross analyses. “No one was living over that many legs.”
Still, Cross refuses to write off the chasing pack. He believes the coming period offers fresh opportunities for players looking to challenge Littler. The key is that not every tournament uses the same format. Where long matches allow Littler time to eventually break opponents, shorter formats can create a very different dynamic. “We're going to go into other tournaments, we're going to have shorter formats, set play comes in, and all set plays are totally different games,” Cross emphasises.
Read also
ADVERTISEMENT
That’s where the world number 23 sees openings for the field. In a short format, you don’t have to live with Littler for as long. One strong start or a decisive burst can be enough to put the young favourite under pressure.
“I think there's chances, massive chances there for players coming up in the next few tournaments,” says Cross. At the same time, he stays realistic. If Littler strings together another long run of legs, it will be exceptionally hard to stop him.

Lucas MichaelDarts Journalist
Lucas Michael is a darts journalist and reporter based in Cambridge, UK, and has been part of the DartsNews team since 2025. He covers professional darts through reports, analysis, round-ups, and live coverage, with a focus on clear context and accurate reporting across the PDC calendar.
A key part of his work is liveblogging major tournaments throughout the year, providing real-time updates, match coverage, and contextual reporting across the professional circuit. He also reports regularly from events on site and has covered the PDC World Darts Championship from the venue, delivering first-hand insight throughout the tournament.
Within the newsroom, Lucas works closely with the editorial team and supports coverage alongside Chief Content Officer Samuel Gill and reporter Kieran Wood.
Lucas holds a BA (Hons) in Sports Journalism. In his work, he places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating content promptly when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026






