Premier League Darts 2026 Round-up | Stephen Bunting picks up first nightly win in much-improved showing as Josh Rock pins perfection in Belfast
PDC
Stephen Bunting has opened his account in the 2026 Premier
League Darts with a convincing night in Belfast, defeating Gian van Veen 6-2 in
the final in a night that was headlined by a nine-darter by the home hero Josh
Rock.
ADVERTISEMENT
Bunting had travelled to Belfast without a win in the
Premier League this year. Three nights of misery was followed by a fantastic
night where he averaged 106 in his opening two ties to cement his spot in the
final.
Van Veen makes a third Premier League final on debut as he
looks to halt this run of losing in finals, most recently faltering in the
Poland Darts Open final. He improved as the night went on to make it to this
stage.
Bunting was sloppy at first on the doubles but escaped any
punishment to break in the very premature stages of the match. A maximum from
the Dutchman put some pressure on Bunting, but the Englishman shrugged it off
and nailed double eight with his final dart to move further in front.
With his first double of the final van Veen gets on the
board with a clinical 70 checkout in two, but Bunting responds with a 106
checkout to regain his two-leg cushion. This was backed up with the former Masters
champion finding double 18 right after the 23-year-old missed two darts to close
the gap again.
Read also
Two doubles were missed for ton+ checkouts. First double 16
for a 108 from Bunting with ‘The Giant’ then missing the bull for a show stopping
170 finish. Bunting cleaned up and was within touching distance of winning the
final. Van Veen, who was looking down the barrel of another final defeat,
prolonged the match for a while longer before Bunting sealed a fantastic night
in the Northern Ireland capital with a brilliant nightly win.
Stephen Bunting is on the board in this year's Premier League Darts
ADVERTISEMENT
| Stephen Bunting | VS | Gian van Veen |
|---|---|---|
| 97.15 | Average (3 Darts) | 95.76 |
| 11 | 100+ Thrown | 12 |
| 9 | 140+ Thrown | 2 |
| 0 | 180 Thrown | 2 |
| 106 | Highest Checkout | 70 |
| Checkout 100+ | ||
| 42.86 | Checkout percentage | 33.33 |
| 6 / null | Checkout | 2 / null |
Two contrasting matches – Semi-final round-up
The league leader Jonny Clayton came to Belfast full of
confidence until he met a rampant Bunting who averaged over 106 in the first
6-0 win of the 2026 Premier League Darts, not including the walkover in Glasgow.
Bunting broke instantly before a second 123 of the night on
the bull saw him move into a commanding 3-0 advantage. Clayton was not finding
his beat gear, and it would cost him as Bunting continued to play at the high
level. He followed that with a 100 checkout before two legs later almost
winning it with a 147 outshot. He came back to clean up as Clayton ended the night
in 11 points.
Following that was a semi-final clash which completely
contrasted the prior one. Gerwyn Price pushed van Veen all the way but missed a
match dart enroute to losing 6-5 in a cracking match of darts.
ADVERTISEMENT
Read also
Van Veen missed eight darts on a double in the opening two
legs as he fell 2-0 behind. He then went 100% on the doubles in the next three
legs including a 160 outshot with Price on 40 as he sails into a 3-2 lead.
The match then stayed on throw with both players raising
their level as they put on a show in front of the crowd. It went to a final leg
decider where Price missed a match dart on the bull by quite a distance. Van
Veen had just one dart to seal a third Premier League in 2026 and nailed double
16 to set up a tie against Bunting.
| Gerwyn Price | VS | Gian van Veen |
|---|---|---|
| 102.13 | Average (3 Darts) | 105.22 |
| 13 | 100+ Thrown | 13 |
| 3 | 140+ Thrown | 8 |
| 5 | 180 Thrown | 4 |
| 122 | Highest Checkout | 160 |
| Checkout 100+ | ||
| 45.45 | Checkout percentage | 40 |
| 5 / null | Checkout | 6 / null |
Littler and Humphries bow out early as Rock produces perfection – Quarterfinal round-up
ADVERTISEMENT
Luke Littler has not got off to the perfect start in this
Premier League Darts. He has got four points so far with two of them coming
thanks to van Gerwen pulling out of Glasgow. His dire form continued as he lost
out to Clayton in a 6-3 defeat. His poor form on the outer ring cost him dearly
against the Welshman who took his chances.
A 156 checkout early on broke the throw before the world
number one got involved with the crowd after a 112 checkout to keep him in it. Clayton
soon got the match done and compounded the two-time world champion to more
misery on the Premier League circuit.
The following match saw the world number two Luke Humphries
join Littler in going for an early bath after a 6-4 defeat to Bunting. ‘Cool
Hand Luke’ has also not got off to the best start in this campaign with missed
doubles costing him on a number of occasions, including this one.
Humphries missed three darts to go 3-1 ahead on double 18 as
Bunting pinned that target enroute to a 4-2 lead, which included a scintillating
143 checkout. Humphries incredible scoring kept him in it but those missed
doubles would prove to be pivotal. He broke back before a 123 on the bull saw
Bunting have the chance to throw for the match and took his chance. Both
players averaged 106 but the more clinical Bunting advanced.
Read also
ADVERTISEMENT
Michael van Gerwen could not return to the Premier League with
a won, spurning a 5-3 lead to Price as he lost 6-5. ‘Mighty Mike’ missed night
three in Glasgow due to illness and was hoping to get back to action with a bang.
This was not the case in a sloppy match of darts. After it looked most bleak,
Price managed to wrangle two breaks from the final three legs to dump out the
seven-time champion who cannot continue his fine start.
The final quarterfinal saw Rock’s poor debut in the Premier
League continues after a 6-2 loss to van Veen, but all the talking points will be
centred around one amazing leg.
Rock was not at the level he can play at with van Veen pouncing.
Three ton+ checkouts on the trot including 109, 167 and 113 went before he took
out 32 with ease to move 5-1 ahead. Then, Rock added his name to the long list
of nine-darters in Belfast as he struck perfection to his and the crowd’s
immense delight. He was unable to get anything else from the match, but it was
a special moment for the Northern Irishman who will treasure that memory for
the rest of his life.
| Gian van Veen | VS | Josh Rock |
|---|---|---|
| 96.08 | Average (3 Darts) | 91.05 |
| 12 | 100+ Thrown | 5 |
| 6 | 140+ Thrown | 5 |
| 1 | 180 Thrown | 3 |
| 167 | Highest Checkout | 141 |
| Checkout 100+ | ||
| 50 | Checkout percentage | 33.33 |
| 6 / null | Checkout | 2 / null |
ADVERTISEMENT

Lucas MichaelDarts Journalist
Lucas Michael is a darts journalist and reporter based in Cambridge, UK, and has been part of the DartsNews team since 2025. He covers professional darts through reports, analysis, round-ups, and live coverage, with a focus on clear context and accurate reporting across the PDC calendar.
A key part of his work is liveblogging major tournaments throughout the year, providing real-time updates, match coverage, and contextual reporting across the professional circuit. He also reports regularly from events on site and has covered the PDC World Darts Championship from the venue, delivering first-hand insight throughout the tournament.
Within the newsroom, Lucas works closely with the editorial team and supports coverage alongside Chief Content Officer Samuel Gill and reporter Kieran Wood.
Lucas holds a BA (Hons) in Sports Journalism. In his work, he places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating content promptly when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026








