“It’s down to the boss, she wanted me to retire five years ago,” he joked. “But I’m still here.” - Peter Wright is not thinking about retirement anytime soon
PDC
For Peter Wright, it felt like a long but successful opening day at the UK Open in Minehead. The experienced Scot ended his day with a strong win over Cameron Menzies, showing that despite a difficult spell he can still shine on the big stage.
ADVERTISEMENT
After his fourth-round match at the UK Open, Wright spoke candidly about his form, his mental reset, and the phase of his career he is currently in. One thing is clear for him: he wants to enjoy darts again.
A strong display with plenty of heavy scoring
According to Wright, the match against Menzies was a duel of constant pressure and heavy scoring. “When we looked at the averages, we weren’t sure who had played better than that,” Wright said afterwards including to DartsNews.com. “We were just hitting each other with steady scores, loads of 180s and stuff like that. Every time I hit a 180, I followed it, which was a bonus. It was nice to see that I can still do it.”
Tough years in the rearview
The past two seasons, however, were anything but smooth for Wright. The former world champion endured a run of disappointing results and slipped down the rankings. “Obviously the performances in the past two years have been disappointing,” he admitted.
Lately, though, he has changed his perspective. Instead of obsessing over averages and results, he now looks more at what he has already achieved. “I used to worry about the averages and winning and stuff like that. But I’ve just started to reason: what other players behind me have won 49 titles, been a two-time world champion, European champion, Matchplay champion and everything else?”
ADVERTISEMENT
Bad days are part of it
That new mentality also helps him move past poor performances more quickly. “When I hit that 70 average last week or the week before, I just struck that off and went, ‘Crap happens.’ And just get on with it, because you’re not going to play like that again next time you play.”
During that rough patch, Wright even briefly considered ending his career. “Yeah, I did for a little while,” he admitted.
But he ultimately realised darts means far more to him than just results. “I like going to the darts. I like seeing my friends and just having a banter and being part of darts that you’ve been all your life. That’s just the way I am.”
ADVERTISEMENT
No pressure anymore
With that new mindset, Wright has become more relaxed about his chances in tournaments. “If I play rubbish that day, I’ll play rubbish that day. But I know I can upset the big names, possibly. It doesn’t mean I’m going to go and win the tournament, but I can put a big name out if I turn up.”
Although Wright already has an impressive trophy haul, he still has targets in mind. “Yes, I want to get to 50. That would be nice before I retire.”
But privately, the bar is even higher. “If I can get to 55 titles before I retire, I’ll be happy.”
ADVERTISEMENT
The tough phase of an elite athlete
During his lean spell, Wright noticed how quickly perceptions in sport can change. Players who once preferred to avoid him now sometimes hope to draw him. “It’s horrible when people go, ‘Oh, I want to draw him because he’s playing rubbish.’”
Peter Wright faces Danny Noppert in the fifth round
He compared his situation with Glen Durrant, the former Premier League Darts champion who also endured a difficult spell. “I used to watch him coming into the floor tournaments and think, I hope I don’t go through that. I’m going through it, I admit it. And it’s horrible when people go, “Oh, I want to draw him because he’s playing rubbish.” That’s hard."
Inspiration for the next generation
ADVERTISEMENT
Still, Wright remains an inspiration for many players, particularly in Scotland. After their match, Menzies even described himself as a fan.
The moment became more meaningful when Wright realised Menzies’ father was in attendance. “I didn’t know his dad was here. I used to play darts with his dad up in Ayrshire in the same team. He’s had a heart attack and he’s recovering really well, so it was good to see him and his wife.”
Wright hopes he can still inspire young Scottish players. “But Gary’s already flying the flag for Scotland anyway — he’s a monster,” he said, referring to Gary Anderson.
The evolution of ‘Snakebite’
Wright has long been known for his flamboyant image, but he admits age is starting to change things. “I’m not dancing across the stage as much because I’m old. Next week I’m 56 and I’m still playing darts,” he laughed.
ADVERTISEMENT
He even joked about how the famous “Snakebite” persona might evolve. “I might come on with a Zimmer frame!”
Despite everything, his love for the sport remains strong. “I still love playing darts. I love the professional dart players around me as well. They’re all nice to me.”
Nowhere near finished
Despite his age, Wright is not thinking about retirement anytime soon. “It’s down to the boss, she wanted me to retire five years ago,” he joked. “But I’m still here.”
There is also a practical reason. “I haven’t earned enough money to retire yet, so I need to pull my socks up.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Interestingly, Wright now practises more than ever. “I actually practise more now than I’ve ever done because I’m enjoying it. I practise every single day.”
Of course, his habit of tinkering with equipment remains. “I unpacked the car after a five-and-a-half-hour drive, set the darts up and went 60, 180, 180. Then I just threw them in the drawer and said, ‘I’m not even using them darts.’ That’s just how my head works!”
With his new relaxed mindset, Wright is taking the rest of the season one match at a time. "I’m just taking each game as it comes and enjoying it.”
Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026