Luke Humphries set to defend nearly 50% of PDC Order of Merit total but remains untouchable: "When you've been winning as much as he has, it doesn't really matter"
PDC
The busiest and perhaps most important part of the darts season is just around the corner. With the biggest televised majors approaching, not only are prestigious titles up for grabs, but significant changes could also occur on the PDC Order of Merit.
ADVERTISEMENT
Because the world rankings are based on prize money earned over the previous two years, substantial amounts of ranking money will disappear from several top players' totals over the coming months.
Former professional darts player and analyst Matthew Edgar examined the situation on his YouTube channel, Edgar TV Darts. He focused particularly on players who have large sums of prize money to defend and who could come under pressure as the season reaches its conclusion.
Van Gerwen defending a huge amount
The standout name in Edgar's analysis is undoubtedly Michael van Gerwen. The Dutchman has been among the world's elite for years, but faces a considerable challenge over the coming months. According to Edgar, the three-time World Champion must defend no less than £412,000 in prize money.
"He's going to be defending a lot of money at the back end of this year: £412,000, a large percentage of his prize fund that could see him drop outside the world's top 16. It includes a European Tour title from a couple of years ago, £200,000 from the World Championship, which we do know the prize money has gone up for, so he wouldn't need to reach the final to defend that, and £100,000 from the World Matchplay.
Read also
That figure is largely made up of prize money from major successes in previous seasons. Van Gerwen is defending prize money from a European Tour title, but it's his performances on the biggest stages that account for most of the total. "So, of that £412,000, £300,000 is from just two events: the World Matchplay and the World Championship. Those could be quite important for Michael van Gerwen's season."
ADVERTISEMENT
Despite this, Edgar doesn't believe Van Gerwen's fans should be overly concerned. He pointed out that the Dutch star still has plenty of opportunities to earn the money back.
"Got that little ace up his sleeve in the fact that he hasn't played in all the ProTours and those side events, so there's a little bit of extra prize money he can pick up along the way. He is also guaranteed a minimum of £51,500 at the back end of the year simply by qualifying for these events. So a good percentage of it is already defended just by turning up—he doesn't need to win too many games.
"Although it looks quite alarming at the moment that Van Gerwen could be outside the top 16, he's got a lot of big events coming up. He only needs a couple of decent runs on TV and he's suddenly back inside the world's top 16 and looking quite comfortable.
"I don't see him coming outside the top 16. I think he's playing far too well for that to happen. I think he's going to pick up quite a lot of wins on TV. Is he going to win titles? I don't know, but I don't see him outside the top 16. I don't think that's a concern."

Michael van Gerwen to drop?
ADVERTISEMENT
Concerns over Dave Chisnall, Bunting looks safe despite large total
While Edgar isn't overly worried about Van Gerwen, he is far more concerned about Dave Chisnall's situation. The experienced arrowsmith risks slipping significantly down the rankings.
According to Edgar, Chisnall is defending £153,000, representing 43.2% of his current ranking total. That includes prize money from tournament victories.
"He's currently provisionally outside, defending 43.2% of his prize money, £153,000, including two titles—a European Tour title and a Players Championship title—with £45,000 coming off his Order of Merit.
"I think he'll be in the Players Championship Finals, but he needs to qualify for the other events: the European Championship and the World Grand Prix. Currently, before the World Matchplay, he's just inside those qualification spots, but he could get knocked out of them."
ADVERTISEMENT
As a result, qualification for the remaining majors becomes crucial. Edgar believes things could quickly unravel if Chisnall misses those tournaments.
"If he misses those events and doesn't go on to make the World Matchplay, Chizz is outside the top 32, which I think is bonkers to see. Even if he gets into those events, he could still end up outside the top 32 depending on other results and how he performs. Obviously, having that guaranteed money would help him out drastically, so Chizz could be outside the world's top 32."
Stephen Bunting is another player defending a substantial amount of prize money, though Edgar sees much less danger there. Bunting is defending £233,000, or 38.1% of his ranking total. Much of that comes from the World Championship.
"I don't see a concern here for Stephen at the back end of the year. Is he going to challenge for the top four? He's got a lot to do. Is he going to be towards the bottom of the top 16? No, I think he'll be top 10. I don't see a concern here for Stephen Bunting."
Read also
ADVERTISEMENT
Humphries defending an enormous total but remains untouchable
Current world number two Luke Humphries is also set to lose a huge amount of ranking money over the coming months. However, Edgar believes his position is entirely different.
Humphries is defending £531,000, an incredible 44.3% of his ranking total. Even so, Edgar expects no problems whatsoever. Humphries' current form is the key factor.
"It sounds like a lot, but when you've been winning as much as Luke Humphries has, it doesn't really matter because, provisionally, he'd only drop to world number three. That's because Gian van Veen reached the World Championship final last year.

Luke Humphries is currently ranked world number two
ADVERTISEMENT
"Humphries is in all the big events. He's got lots more prize money to come onto his Order of Merit. I see no concern whatsoever regarding Luke Humphries and the rankings.
"Sometimes you look at the percentage and think, "That's a lot. This player could really tumble down the rankings." They could—but not Luke Humphries. He's got far too much money on the Order of Merit and he's playing far too well. He's just won the US Darts Masters, beating Luke Littler in the final. He had that amazing showing at The O2 and a great Premier League campaign. He's shown his quality all year. He's definitely one to keep an eye on for more titles. Surprise, eh? I'm not telling you anything new."
Mike De Decker faces the biggest challenge
The player Edgar believes is under the greatest pressure is Belgium's Mike De Decker. His previous results over the past two years have left him with a huge amount to defend.
The largest portion comes from his World Grand Prix triumph. "He's defending the World Grand Prix title, worth £120,000. That's coming off the Order of Merit this year, along with £20,000 from the Players Championship Finals and £15,000 from Players Championship 16. It was a fantastic period for him, but it's all coming off his ranking this year.
ADVERTISEMENT
"At the time of recording, he is the highest-ranked player not in the World Matchplay. He's also not in any other major, including the Players Championship Finals, apart from the World Championship. That's the concern."
Edgar has noticed encouraging signs, however. "Defending 55% of your prize money—£236,000—is a huge amount. As things stand, De Decker would be comfortably outside the world's top 32.
"Are there 32 players better than Mike De Decker? The rankings would suggest there are if things stay the same by the end of the year. So that could be quite a significant drop."
Read also
Doets and Nijman could be the biggest movers
ADVERTISEMENT
Alongside the players likely to fall, Edgar also highlighted those with the greatest potential to climb. One of them is Kevin Doets.
"The guy has been a winning machine on the ProTour and the European Tour this year. I think he's really going to crack it in the big events. He's defending virtually nothing and is undoubtedly going to fly up the rankings. Keep your eye on Kevin Doets as a player to watch."
Nijman less of a shock and he too is part of that next breed of darting star not defending a lot. He also sees him in next year's Premier League line-up.
"I wouldn't be surprised if Wessel Nijman starts challenging for the top four within the next 12 months. He just needs a couple of good runs on TV. I think we'll see him in the Premier League next year. I think that's the direction he's heading. I don't see anything stopping him right now. Eight titles, six on the floor and two on the European Tour. An unbelievable player."

Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026










