Pairs shake-up could create ‘really good narrative’ - Paul Nicholson backs plans for future pairs events in the PDC after World Cup of Darts success
PDC
The World Cup of Darts has, once again, been a roaring success with darts fans worldwide. The PDC’s only pairs competition, where players compete for their country, was won in sensational fashion by the Northern Irish duo of Josh Rock and Daryl Gurney last night, and the overall sensation caused by this year’s tournament has led to plenty of speculation about whether more pairs tournaments should be added to the PDC calendar.
ADVERTISEMENT
This is a notion backed by Paul Nicholson, the former Players Championship Finals champion and a World Cup finalist. ‘The Asset’, in conversation with Sporting Life, was presented with two potential options: A ‘Blind Pairs’ tournament where the top 32 players in the world are randomly drawn with each other, and a ‘Pick Your Pair’ option where the top seeded players pick from a pool of lower ranked prospects. The 46-year old seemed to respond in kind to both:
"I think there’s mileage in both, but from a player’s perspective, they’d want to choose. That’s a show in itself. You have a half an hour show right, ‘number one seed, who’s going to be your pick for the pairs championship?’ But it would be interesting from the perspective if it was blind pairs who certain people would get."
The ‘Geordie-Aussie’ then spoke about some potential drawbacks of the blind pairs option: "There are possibilities here where someone might play with someone that they don’t necessarily get along with, so I don’t think certain promoters would want to get on with that. They’d want to give the person the choice to get rid of that possible controversy. So me, personally, I think the second idea of choosing your partner and maybe making it anybody outside of the top 16."
Nicholson reached the World Cup final for Australia during his career
Nicholson was finally asked about how the dynamic of a partnership works in pairs events, having had significant experience from representing Australia five times at the World Cup, and whether fallouts were commonplace: "I never did during playing. Simon [Whitlock] and I once had a disagreement before a World Cup, but there are people who maybe do have a bit of friction at the end of a defeat. That’s natural, everybody wants to win, but it would create a really good narrative for the journalists and for the promoters involved. I think it’s a great idea."
Overall, there appears to be a strong backing from one of the great pairs players in PDC darts, which, alongside support from other prominent players and supporters, could lead the PDC to bite the bullet and introduce a second pairs tournament to the calendar sooner rather than later.
ADVERTISEMENT
The World Cup of Darts captured everyone's imagination once again.
— Chris Hammer (@ChrisHammer180) June 16, 2025
So should there be another pairs event on the PDC calendar that isn't about countries? Here's two options... pic.twitter.com/arhONstvMR
Finlay Williams is currently completing his final year of secondary education and already demonstrates the ambition, curiosity, and dedication we value in emerging sports journalists. With a clear goal to pursue full-time work in sports media, Finlay brings a particular depth of knowledge in darts—his standout area of expertise—but also shows strong insight across football (as a lifelong Aberdeen FC supporter), motorsports, cricket, and curling, a sport in which he competed at a high level during his junior years.
His passion for sport is matched by an instinctive feel for storytelling. Whether diving into the personalities of darts icons like Steve Beaton and Andy Boulton, or following football leagues across the globe—with a special interest in the Bundesliga—Finlay approaches coverage with both humour and a keen editorial eye.
He is currently gaining practical experience as a Media Intern with Scottish Curling, where he is also co-producing the organisation’s upcoming podcast alongside their Digital Lead. In addition, he writes his own Substack blog, For Darts Sake, which showcases his ability to balance narrative flair with factual grounding—qualities that align well with DN’s editorial ethos.
Finlay has expressed a strong interest in liveblogging, and we believe his style—story-driven, well-researched, and engaging—makes him a promising addition to our team. We look forward to supporting his development as a young journalist and helping him sharpen his voice within a professional sports media environment.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026