PDC Form Guide: Is Luke Humphries unofficial World No.1? as Stephen Bunting and Callan Rydz surprisingly impress
PDC
Luke Humphries has underlined his impressive form once again. Not only did the Englishman successfully defend his title at the US Darts Masters in New York by seeing off Luke Littler in a thrilling final, the latest Form Guide from PDC statistician Christopher Kempf also shows that “Cool Hand Luke” is currently the benchmark in professional darts.
ADVERTISEMENT
The PDC Form Guide, based on the last 200 legs played by each Tour Card holder, provides a detailed picture of the top players’ current performances. It looks not only at averages, but also at metrics such as scoring power, doubles, checkouts, and the so-called OChE rating (Overall Checkout Efficiency), a measure that indicates how efficiently a player actually wins legs.
Humphries the standard-bearer
Humphries leads both the average and the OChE ranking and is currently the only player within the PDC to average over 100 across his last 200 legs. That has even given him a comfortable lead over his biggest challenger, Luke Littler, who has also posted impressive numbers in recent months.
Strikingly, Littler is still slightly more efficient when legs are decided within four visits. The reigning world champion finishes 14.5 percent of his won legs in twelve darts or fewer, compared to 13.1 percent for Humphries. Yet the balance clearly tips in favor of the former world champion as soon as a leg lasts a touch longer. Humphries wins as many as 61 percent of his legs within fifteen darts, while the average among all Tour Card holders sits at just 29 percent. No other player outside Humphries and Littler even comes close. Wessel Nijman follows as best of the rest with 47.7 percent.
Read also
That consistent efficiency also translates to the OChE rating. Although it dipped slightly in June, Humphries still stands at an impressive score of 68. According to Kempf’s model, that means the Englishman, based on his current level, wins roughly two legs for every leg he loses against an average opponent on the PDC circuit.
Notable role for Bunting
ADVERTISEMENT
The fact that Humphries and Littler are setting the pace right now does not mean other players haven’t had an excellent month. Stephen Bunting may be the best example. “The Bullet” reached at least the semi-finals at two consecutive Players Championship events. With nine match wins and more than £10,000 in prize money, he steadily climbed the metrics.
At the US Darts Masters, Bunting also showcased his class on the checkouts by producing a fine 164 checkout. As a result, he now shares top spot on the list for the most checkouts of 99 and 101 points or more over the last 200 legs, alongside Wessel Nijman. Thanks to that strong combination of scoring power and efficient finishing, Bunting has risen to sixth on the OChE ranking. Notably, he sits above several players who score heavier on average, which underlines once more how vital chance conversion is.

Stephen Bunting posted high averages in the recent period
The biggest climber in June, however, is Callan Rydz. The Englishman won his board final twice at Players Championship events and took out established names such as Gerwyn Price and Rob Cross along the way. His average has risen by almost five points in just one month, an exceptionally large improvement at this level.
Even so, Rydz remains one of the most unpredictable players on the ProTour. Right after his fine wins over Price and Cross came defeats to Adam Leek and Richard Veenstra, players who, based on the Form Guide, are rated significantly lower. His doubles in particular remain a major point of focus. Of all players who rank in the top sixteen by average, Rydz has the lowest checkout percentage on the doubles. Precisely at the key moments his finishing still lets him down too often, causing potential deep tournament runs to end early on a regular basis.
ADVERTISEMENT
FORM GUIDE 📈
— PDC Darts (@OfficialPDC) June 29, 2026
PDC Stats Analyst @ochepedia analyses an extended edition of the Form Guide, with the full breakdown available below 👇👀
🗞️ https://t.co/zBUyblltSj pic.twitter.com/MVJZ0b29Xc
Little return for Van Duijvenbode
For Dirk van Duijvenbode, the picture looks less positive. The Dutchman has long been considered one of the most explosive scorers within the PDC, and the numbers still confirm that. With 77 maximums in his last 200 legs, he trails only four players on the list for most 180s. Of those four, only Luke Littler also qualified for the most recent Premier League Darts.
Yet that scoring power is currently yielding too little return. At the inaugural Slovak Darts Open, Van Duijvenbode suffered his fifth first-round exit at a European Tour event this season. As a result, he currently sits outside the qualifying places for the European Championship, despite having taken part in all nine Euro Tour events of 2026.
Read also
ADVERTISEMENT
According to Kempf, Van Duijvenbode has also experienced the biggest drop in OChE rating of all PDC players in recent weeks. That has everything to do with his return on the doubles and the big checkouts. In his last 200 legs, the Dutchman has recorded only six checkouts of 100 points or more, while his success on the doubles has fallen to just 35 percent. That means he is leaving many chances on the table to actually convert his excellent scoring power into match wins.
The latest Form Guide thus confirms what the results of recent months already suggested. Luke Humphries is currently the most complete player on the circuit, combining an unprecedented scoring level with exceptional efficiency at the key moments. Luke Littler remains his biggest challenger and continues to impress with his scoring power, while players like Stephen Bunting and Wessel Nijman are knocking loudly on the door. At the same time, the numbers show that Callan Rydz is on a notable rise, while Dirk van Duijvenbode will need to find more return on the doubles to reconnect with the absolute elite.

Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026
- Not even slightly interestedrick6730-10-2026
- And yet the PDC has decided to aggravate this problem by doubling the Players Championship Finals field from 2027. I can't imagine there will be fewer withdrawals next year with even less reason to turn up. I can only hope that a whole slew of Challenge Tour top-up players receive enough prize money in the absence of much of the elite, that some of the more complacent among them struggle to scrape into even a heavily diluted field! More semi-pro players will get to test their mettle, but the standard of competition will be much inferior. It could hardly be said that the Players Championship series will provide an opportunity for darts' second string to test their Tour Card credentials anymore, but at least it will underscore the achievements of those Challenge Tour players of current and previous years, who were able to prove themselves as more than capable of competing with, and beating, the elite of the sport on a consistent basis, and reaping the due rewards.Deduce635828-10-2026
- No point in being there? Champions want to win.Deduce635828-10-2026
- Littler lost to crabtree in the youth/junior/whatever you call it. He had no point in being there. He's unfortunately now got to the stage,he feels all he has to do is get on the stage to win. Well,I hope he realises part of his fear factor has gone. Happened to Taylor,then van gerwen,and it's causing him to realise pretty sharp,he isn't unstoppable. It's good for the sport,not 1 single player in my 60 years has ever,or will ever be, unbeatable.rick6725-10-2026
- I think it's great to see Mark Webster looking good,good ladrick6725-10-2026
- I agree,I can't believe the lack of coverage of this sad loss. Always enjoyed watching him,but I guess now it's all about littler,well it seems that way. Darts has sadly lost a good manrick6717-10-2026
- In the absence of a report regarding the death of Stefan Lord, I'll assist. An excellent player in the late 70s and early 80s, he actually won the now defunct 3rd place match at two World Championships and a couple of the News of the World Championships. A fabulous player and easily the best Swedish player ever. Rest peacefully Stefan.richieburnettrocks16-10-2026
- Joking aside, it is the second most watched sport on sky (more than golf, F1 etc) behind football only, and in participation is second to only football and swimming. It doesn't get the attention or sponsorship of "bigger" sports because it's not as sexy, but it's right up there.BandB13-10-2026









